Skip to main content

Optimization of Decision Rules Relative to Coverage - Comparative Study

  • Conference paper
Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems Paradigms

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8537))

Abstract

In the paper, we present a modification of the dynamic programming algorithm for optimization of decision rules relative to coverage. The aims of the paper are: (i) study of the coverage of decision rules, and (ii) study of the size of a directed acyclic graph (the number of nodes and edges), for a proposed algorithm. The paper contains experimental results with decision tables from UCI Machine Learning Repository.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alkhalid, A., Amin, T., Chikalov, I., Hussain, S., Moshkov, M., Zielosko, B.: Dagger: A tool for analysis and optimization of decision trees and rules. In: Computational Informatics, Social Factors and New Information Technologies: Hypermedia Perspectives and Avant-Garde Experiences in the Era of Communicability Expansion, pp. 29–39. Blue Herons (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amin, T., Chikalov, I., Moshkov, M., Zielosko, B.: Dynamic programming approach for partial decision rule optimization. Fundam. Inform. 119(3-4), 233–248 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Amin, T., Chikalov, I., Moshkov, M., Zielosko, B.: Dynamic programming approach to optimization of approximate decision rules. Inf. Sci. 221, 403–418 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. An, A., Cercone, N.J.: Rule quality measures improve the accuracy of rule induction: An experimental approach. In: Ohsuga, S., Raś, Z.W. (eds.) ISMIS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1932, pp. 119–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Asuncion, A., Newman, D.J.: UCI Machine Learning Repository ( (2007), http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/

  6. Błaszczyński, J., Słowiński, R., Szeląg, M.: Sequential covering rule induction algorithm for variable consistency rough set approaches. Inf. Sci. 181(5), 987–1002 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dembczyński, K., Kotłowski, W., Słowiński, R.: Ender: a statistical framework for boosting decision rules. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 21(1), 52–90 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Moshkov, M., Piliszczuk, M., Zielosko, B.: Partial Covers, Reducts and Decision Rules in Rough Sets - Theory and Applications. SCI, vol. 145. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Moshkov, M., Zielosko, B.: Combinatorial Machine Learning - A Rough Set Approach. SCI, vol. 360. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen, H.S.: Approximate boolean reasoning: Foundations and applications in data mining. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets V. LNCS, vol. 4100, pp. 334–506. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen, H.S., Ślęzak, D.: Approximate reducts and association rules - correspondence and complexity results. In: Zhong, N., Skowron, A., Ohsuga, S. (eds.) RSFDGrC 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1711, pp. 137–145. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Pawlak, Z., Skowron, A.: Rough sets and boolean reasoning. Inf. Sci. 177(1), 41–73 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Sikora, M., Wróbel, Ł.: Data-driven adaptive selection of rule quality measures for improving rule induction and filtration algorithms. Int. J. General Systems 42(6), 594–613 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stefanowski, J., Vanderpooten, D.: Induction of decision rules in classification and discovery-oriented perspectives. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 16(1), 13–27 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zielosko, B.: Optimization of approximate decision rules relative to coverage. In: Kozielski, S., Mrozek, D., Kasprowski, P., Małysiak-Mrozek, B. (eds.) BDAS 2014. CCIS, vol. 424, pp. 170–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zielosko, B. (2014). Optimization of Decision Rules Relative to Coverage - Comparative Study. In: Kryszkiewicz, M., Cornelis, C., Ciucci, D., Medina-Moreno, J., Motoda, H., Raś, Z.W. (eds) Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems Paradigms. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8537. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08729-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08729-0_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08728-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08729-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics