Skip to main content

An Inter-Comparison of Coastal Vulnerability Assessment Methods

  • Conference paper
Engineering Geology for Society and Territory – Volume 4

Abstract

In this paper a Coastal Vulnerability Assessment method (CVA) was compared with the well-established CVI method in order to obtain validation data and discuss the different results. The structure of the proposed method relies upon a key parameter, known as impact index Ii, which accounts for wave climate, bathymetry and sediment data and depends on the wave run-up height, the seasonal and long-term erosion, and the efficiency of coastal protection structures. The comparison between this CVA and the existing CVI method was done on a test site already examined. The calculation of the different contributions of each method was transformed in appropriate vulnerability scores in order to examine and discuss the different results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arun KA, Kunte PD (2012) Coastal vulnerability assessment for Chennai, east coast of India using geospatial techniques. Nat Hazards 64:853–872. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0276-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benassai G, Montuori A, Migliaccio M, Nunziata F (2013) Sea wave modeling with X-band COSMO-SkyMed© SAR-derived wind field forcing. Ocean Sci 9:325–341. doi:10.5194/os-9-325-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Paola G, Igcesias j, Rosriguer G, Benassai G, Aucecci P., Pappoye G (2011) Estimating coastal vulnerability in a meso-tidal beach by means of quantitative and semi-quantitative methodologies. J Coast Res SI61:303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Directorate General Environment European Commission (2004) Living with coastal erosion in Europe: Sediment and Space for Sustainability. PART I—Major findings and Policy Recommendations of the EUROSION project

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaki-Papanastassiou K et al (2010) Coastal vulnerability assessment to sea-level rise based on geomorphological and oceanographical parameters: the case of Argolikos Gulf, Peloponnese, Greece. Hellenic J Geosci 45:109–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornitz VM et al. (1994) The development of a coastal risk assessment database: vulnerability to sea-level rise in the US Southeast. J Coast Res SI12:327–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriebel DL, Dean RG (1993) Convolution method for time-dependent beach-profile response. J Waterway Port Coast Ocean Eng 119(2):204–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappone G et al (2012) Relative sea-level rise and marine erosion and inundation in the Sele river coastal plain (Southern Italy): scenarios for the next century. Rend Fis Acc Lincei 23:121–129. doi:10.1007/s12210-012-0166-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockdon HF, Holman RA, Howd PA, Sallenger AH (2006) Empirical parametrization of setup, swash, and run-up. Coast Eng 53(7):573–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Benassai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Benassai, G., Di Paola, G., Aucelli, P., Passarella, M., Mucerino, L. (2014). An Inter-Comparison of Coastal Vulnerability Assessment Methods. In: Lollino, G., Manconi, A., Locat, J., Huang, Y., Canals Artigas, M. (eds) Engineering Geology for Society and Territory – Volume 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08660-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics