Advertisement

Non Satis Scire: To Know Is Not Enough

e-Assessment of Student-Teachers’ Competence as New Teachers
  • Wilfried Admiraal
  • Tanja Janssen
  • Jantina Huizenga
  • Frans Kranenburg
  • Ruurd Taconis
  • Alessandra Corda
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 439)

Abstract

In teacher education programmes, text-based portfolios are generally used to assess student-teachers’ competence as new teachers. However, striking discrepancies are known to exist between the competencies reflected in a written portfolio and the competencies observed in actual classroom practice. Multiple assessments should be used to provide a more valid assessment of student-teachers’ competence as new teachers. Technology can support this kind of multiple and flexible ways of assessment. In a Research & Development project, four types of e-assessments were designed, implemented and evaluated in 27 interventions in 13 post-graduated teacher education programs in the Netherlands. Teacher educators reported positive outcomes of the interventions in terms of new procedures, materials and tools. No significant effects were found of the implementation of the four types of e-assessments on the evaluation by either teacher educators or student-teachers. A possible explanation for this absence of effects might be teething problems of the interventions implemented.

Keywords

teacher education assessment teacher competence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fox, R.K., White, C.S., Kidd, J.K.: Program Portfolios: Documenting Teachers’ Growth in Reflection‐based Inquiry. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 17, 149–167 (2011), doi:10.1080/13540602.2011.538506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Winsor, P.J.T., Butt, R.L., Reeves, H.: Portraying Professional Development in Preservice Teacher Education: Can Portfolios Do the Job? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 5, 9–31 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Day, C.: Reflection: A Necessary But Not Sufficient Condition for Professional Development. British Educational Research Journal 19, 83–93 (1993), doi:10.1080/0141192930190107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hatton, N., Smith, D.: Reflection in Teacher Education: Towards Definition and Implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education 11, 33–49 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Korthagen, F.A.J.: Techniques for Stimulating Reflection in Teacher Education Seminars. Teaching and Teacher Education 18, 265–274 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bartell, C., Kayne, C., Morin, J.A.: Teaching Portfolios in Teacher Education. Teacher Education Quarterly 25, 23–32 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Darling-Hammond, L., Snyder, J.: Authentic Assessment of Teaching in Context. Teaching and Teacher Education 16, 523–545 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Woodward, H., Nanlohy, P.: Digital Portfolios: Fact or Fashion? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 29, 227–238 (2004a), doi:10.1080/0260293042000188492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woodward, H., Nanlohy, P.: Digital Portfolios in Pre-service Teacher Education. Assessment in Education 11, 166–178 (2004b), doi:10.1080/0969594042000259475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Delandshere, G., Arens, S.A.: Examining the Quality of Evidence in Pre-service Teacher Portfolios. Journal of Teacher Education 54, 57–73 (2003), doi:10.1177/0022487102238658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burroughs, R.: Composing Standards and Composing Teachers. Journal of Teacher Education 52, 223–232 (2001), doi:10.1177/0022487101052003005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Uhlenbeck, A.: The Development of an Assessment Procedure for Beginning Teachers of English as a Foreign Language. University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bower, M., Cavanagh, M., Moloney, R., Dao, M.M.: Developing Communication Competence Using an Online Video Reflection System: Pre-service Teachers’ Experiences. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 39, 311–326 (2011), doi:10.1080/1359866X.2011.614685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosaen, C.L., Lundeberg, M., Cooper, M., Fritzen, A., Terpstra, M.: Noticing Noticing: How Does Investigation of Video Records Change How Teachers Reflect on Their Experiences? Journal of Teacher Education 59, 347–360 (2009), doi:10.1177/0022487108322128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., Pittman, M.E.: Video as a Tool for Fostering Productive Discussions in Mathematics Professional Development. Teaching and Teacher Education 24, 417–436 (2008), doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rich, P.J., Hannafin, M.: Video Annotation Tools: Technologies to Scaffold, Structure, and Transform Teacher Reflection. Journal of Teacher Education 60, 52–67 (2009), doi:10.1177/0022487108328486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, G.C., Wu, C.: Enhancing the Teaching Experience of Pre-service Teachers Through the Use of Video in Web-based Computer-mediated Communication (CMC). Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43, 369–380 (2006), doi:10.1080/14703290600973836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sherin, M.G., Van Es, E.A.: Effects of Video Club Participation on Teachers’ Professional Vision. Journal of Teacher Education 60, 20–37 (2009), doi:10.1177/0022487108328155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moss, P.A., Sutherland, L.-M., Haniford, L., Miller, R., Johnson, D., Geist, P.K., et al.: Interrogating the Generalizability of Portfolio Assessments of Beginning Teachers: A Qualitative Study. Education Policy Analysis Archives 12(32) (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schutz, A.M., Moss, P.A.: Reasonable Decisions in Portfolio Assessment: Evaluating Complex Evidence of Teaching. Education Policy Analysis Archives 12(33) (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wolf, K., Dietz, M.: Teaching Portfolios; Purposes and Possibilities. Teacher Education Quarterly 25, 9–22 (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fill, K., Ottewil, R.: Sink or Swim: Taking Advantage of Developments in Video Streaming. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43, 397–408 (2006) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Geertz, C.: The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Admiraal, W., Hoeksma, M., van de Kamp, M.-T., van Duin, G.: Assessment of Teacher Competence Using Video Portfolios: Reliability, Construct Validity and Consequential Validity. Teaching and Teacher Education 27, 1019–1028 (2011), doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Admiraal, W., Lockhorst, D., Smit, B., Weijers, S.: The Integrative Model of Behavior Prediction to Explain Technology Use in Post-graduate Teacher Education Programs in the Netherlands. International Journal of Higher Education 4(2), 172–178 (2013), doi:10.5430/ijheGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wilfried Admiraal
    • 1
  • Tanja Janssen
    • 2
  • Jantina Huizenga
    • 2
  • Frans Kranenburg
    • 3
  • Ruurd Taconis
    • 4
  • Alessandra Corda
    • 5
  1. 1.Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Eindhoven Technical UniversityEindhovenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Amsterdam University of Applied SciencesAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations