Skip to main content

A Multiple Domain Analysis and Systems Modelling Intelligence Architecture

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Management in Organizations (KMO 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 185))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1766 Accesses

Abstract

Intelligence Architectures today are typically categorized as: Business Intelligence Architectures which are predominantly designed to meet objective discovery goals; and Science Intelligence Architectures which are predominantly designed to meet subjective discovery goals. However, there is increasing need for intelligence architectures that meet both objective and subjective discovery goals; and that straddle not only business and science contexts but also those of policy and governance. This paper proposes an adaptive software architecture which combines scientific as well as business theories as the basis for analysing the multiple domains inherent in the development of various social and economic sectors. The proposed architecture is applied to a small scale fisheries ecosystem and the outcomes are illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Huber, P.J.: What Is Data Analysis? Data Analysis: What Can be Learned from the Past 50 Years, pp. 1–9. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azvine, B., Cui, Z., Nauck, D.: Towards real-time business intelligence. BT Technol. J. 23(3), 214–225 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. International Business Machines. IBM Cognos Software. IBM. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/cognos/index.html. Accessed 24 Apr 2014

  4. SAS. SAS Business Intelligence. SAS. http://www.sas.com/en_us/software/business-intelligence.html. Accessed 24 Apr 2014

  5. Tableau Software. Tableau Business Intelligence. Tableau Software. http://www.tableausoftware.com/business-intelligence. Accessed 24 Apr 2014

  6. Negash, S.: Business intelligence. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13, 177–195 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Synergy Software. Synergy KaleidaGraph. Synergy Software. http://www.synergy.com/wordpress_650164087/kaleidagraph/prodinfo/. Accessed 24 Apr 2014

  8. Atlas.ti Scientific Software Development. Atlas.ti Qualitative Data Analysis. Atlas.ti Scientific Software Development. http://www.atlasti.com/index.html. Accessed 24 Apr 2014

  9. Mallalieu, K.I., Sankarsingh, C.I.: Contemplating mobile applications for small scale fisheries in Trinidad and Tobago. In: Dunn, H. (ed.) Ringtone of opportunity: policy technology and access in Caribbean communications. Ian Randle, Kingston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mallalieu, K.I., Sankarsingh, C.V.: mFisheries: lessons in first cycle design of a context-appropriate mobile application suite. Int. J. Technol. Inclusive Educ. 1(1) 9–16 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hilliard, R.: IEEE-STD-1471-2000 Recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems. IEEE (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cetina, C., Giner, P., Fons, J., Pelechano, V.: Autonomic computing through reuse of variability models at runtime: the case of smart homes. IEEE Comput. 42(10), 37–43 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. SO;IEC;IEEE, ISO/IEC/IEEE Systems and software engineering – architecture description, ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011(E) (Revision of ISO/IEC 42010:2007 and IEEE Std 1471–2000), pp. 1–46 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rational Software Development. Rational Unified Process Best Practices for Software Development Teams, MA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bechhofer, S.: OWL: web ontology language. In: Liu, L., Tamer Özsu, M. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wolf and, M., Wicksteed, C.:Date and time formats, W3C NOTE NOTE-datetime-19980827, August 1998

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greenwood, M., Goble, C., Stevens, R.D., Zhao, J., Addis, M., Marvin, D., Moreau, L., Oinn, T.: Provenance of e-science experiments-experience from bioinformatics. In: Proceedings of UK E-Science All Hands Meeting 2003, pp. 223–226 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Caribbean ICT Research Programme. m-fisheries, Caribbean ICT Research Programme, 09 02 2010. http://cirp.org.tt/mfisheries/. Accessed 01 Feb 2014

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Musti K. S. Sastry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mallalieu, K., Ramlal, C.J., Sastry, M.K.S. (2014). A Multiple Domain Analysis and Systems Modelling Intelligence Architecture. In: Uden, L., Fuenzaliza Oshee, D., Ting, IH., Liberona, D. (eds) Knowledge Management in Organizations. KMO 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 185. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08618-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08618-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08617-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08618-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics