Skip to main content

Self-governance by Transfiguration: From Learning to Prescriptions

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8554))

Abstract

Norms are commonly understood as guides for the conduct of autonomous agents, thereby easing their individual decision-making and coordination. However, their study exhibits a polarity between (i) norms as behavioural patterns emerging from repeated agents’ (inter)actions and (ii) norms as explicit prescriptions. In this paper, we attempt to build a bridge between these two conceptual poles of norms: it takes the form of a mental function for prescriptive transfiguration allowing reinforced learning agents to express their learning experiences into prescriptions. The population of transfigurative agents are then equipped with a consensus system to build and enforce prescriptive systems to self-govern on-line. Simple simulations suggest the pertinence of the approach and shows its weaknesses, in particular prescriptions stalling learning, and timeliness in norm construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ågotnes, T., Wooldridge, M.: Optimal social laws. In: AAMAS, pp. 667–674 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., Huang, Z., van der Torre, L.: The boid architecture: Conflicts between beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, AGENTS 2001, pp. 9–16. ACM, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Castelfranchi, C., Giardini, F., Lorini, E., Tummolini, L.: The prescriptive destiny of predictive attitudes: from expectations to norms via conventions. In: Proceedings of CogSci 2003, 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christelis, G., Rovatsos, M., Petrick, R.P.A.: Exploiting domain knowledge to improve norm synthesis. In: AAMAS, pp. 831–838 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Esteva, M., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J., Arcos, J., Sierra, C., Garcia, P.: Institutionalising open multi-agent systems. In: Durfee, E. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Multi-agent Systems (ICMAS), pp. 381–382. IEEE Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fitoussi, D., Tennenholtz, M.: Choosing social laws for multi-agent systems: minimality and simplicity. Artificial Intelligence 119(1-2), 61–101 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: Bio logical agents: Norms, beliefs, intentions in defeasible logic. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 17(1), 36–69 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morales, J., López-Sánchez, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A.: Michael Wooldridge, and Wamberto Vasconcelos, ‘Automated synthesis of normative systems’. In: AAMAS, pp. 483–490 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Partalas, I., Feneris, I., Vlahavas, I.P.: Multi-agent reinforcement learning using strategies and voting. In: ICTAI (2), pp. 318–324. IEEE Computer Society

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell Polinsky, A., Shavell, S.: Handbook of Law and Economics, 1st edn., vol. 1. Elsevier (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Riveret, R., Rotolo, A., Sartor, G.: ‘Probabilistic rule-based argumentation for norm-governed learning agents’. Artif. Intell 20(4), 383–420 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Andrighetto, G., Conte, R., Campennl, M.: Minding Norms: Mechanisms and dynamics of social order in agent societies. Oxford Scholarship (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sartor, G.: Legal Reasoning: A Cognitive Approach to Law. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sen, S., Airiau, S.: Emergence of norms through social learning. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence, IJCAI 2007, pp. 1507–1512. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shoham, Y., Tennenholtz, M.: ‘On social laws for artificial agent societies: off-line design’. Artificial Intelligence 73(1-2), 231–252 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement learning: An introduction, vol. 116. Cambridge Univ. Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Riveret, R., Artikis, A., Busquets, D., Pitt, J. (2014). Self-governance by Transfiguration: From Learning to Prescriptions. In: Cariani, F., Grossi, D., Meheus, J., Parent, X. (eds) Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. DEON 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8554. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08615-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08615-6_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08614-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08615-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics