Advertisement

SymBA: Diffeomorphic Registration Based on Gradient Orientation Alignment and Boundary Proximity of Sparsely Selected Voxels

  • Dante De Nigris
  • D. Louis Collins
  • Tal Arbel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8545)

Abstract

We propose a novel non-linear registration strategy which seeks an optimal deformation that maps corresponding boundaries of similar orientation. Our approach relies on a local similarity metric based on gradient orientation alignment and distance to the nearest inferred boundary and is evaluated on a reduced set of locations corresponding to inferred boundaries. The deformation model is characterized as the integration of a time-constant velocity field and optimization is performed in coarse to fine multi-level strategy with a gradient ascent technique. Our approach is computational efficient since it relies on a sparse selection of voxels corresponding to detected boundaries, yielding robust and accurate results with reduced processing times. We demonstrate quantitative results in the context of the non-linear registration of inter-patient magnetic resonance brain volumes obtained from a public dataset (CUMC12). Our proposed approach achieves a similar level of accuracy as other state-of-the-art methods but with processing times as short as 1.5 minutes. We also demonstrate preliminary qualitative results in the time-sensitive registration contexts of registering MR brain volumes to intra-operative ultrasound for improved guidance in neurosurgery.

Keywords

image registration pixel selection diffeomorphism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    De Nigris, D., Collins, D.L., Arbel, T.: Fast rigid registration of pre-operative magnetic resonance images to intra-operative ultrasound for neurosurgery based on high confidence gradient orientations. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 8(4), 649–661 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Nigris, D., Collins, D.L., Arbel, T.: Multi-modal image registration based on gradient orientations of minimal uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging PP(99), 1 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haber, E., Modersitzki, J.: Intensity gradient based registration and fusion of multi-modal images. In: Larsen, R., Nielsen, M., Sporring, J. (eds.) MICCAI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4191, pp. 726–733. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mercier, L., Del Maestro, R.F., Petrecca, K., Araujo, D., Haegelen, C., Collins, D.L.: Online database of clinical mr and ultrasound images of brain tumors. Medical Physics 39(6) (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Avants, B., Epstein, C., Grossman, M., Gee, J.: Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Medical Image Analysis 12(1), 26–41 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Battiti, R.: Accelerated backpropagation learning: Two optimization methods. Complex Systems 3(4), 331–342 (1989)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klein, A., Andersson, J., Ardekani, B.A., Ashburner, J., Avants, B., Chiang, M.C., Christensen, G.E., Collins, D.L., Gee, J., Hellier, P., et al.: Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain mri registration. Neuroimage 46(3), 786–802 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Popuri, K., Cobzas, D., Jägersand, M.: A variational formulation for discrete registration. In: Mori, K., Sakuma, I., Sato, Y., Barillot, C., Navab, N. (eds.) MICCAI 2013, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8151, pp. 187–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caviness Jr., V.S., Meyer, J., Makris, N., Kennedy, D.N.: Mri-based topographic parcellation of human neocortex: an anatomically specified method with estimate of reliability. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8(6), 566–587 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hellier, P., Barillot, C., Memin, E., Perez, P.: Hierarchical estimation of a dense deformation field for 3-d robust registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 20(5), 388–402 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rohlfing, T.: Image similarity and tissue overlaps as surrogates for image registration accuracy: Widely used but unreliable. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 31(2), 153–163 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dante De Nigris
    • 1
  • D. Louis Collins
    • 2
  • Tal Arbel
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Intelligent MachinesMcGill UniversityCanada
  2. 2.Montreal Neurological InstituteMcGill UniversityCanada

Personalised recommendations