Advertisement

Fluorescence-Based Enhanced Reality for Colorectal Endoscopic Surgery

  • F. Selka
  • V. Agnus
  • S. Nicolau
  • A. Bessaid
  • L. Soler
  • J. Marescaux
  • M. Diana
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8545)

Abstract

Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) application using computer vision algorithms, helps surgeons to increase intervention safety. With the availability of the fluorescence camera in MIS surgery, the anastomosis procedure becomes safer to avoid ischemia.We propose an Augmented Reality (AR) software that non-rigidly registers the ischemic map based on fluorescence signal on the live endoscopic sequence. The efficiency of the proposed system relies on robust feature tracking and accurate image registration using image deformation. Experimental results on in-vivo data have shown that the proposed system satisfies the clinical requirements.

Keywords

feature tracking augmented reality non-rigid registration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ferlay, J., et al.: GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0 Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi, H.K., Law, W.L., Ho, J.W.C.: Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 49, 1719–1725 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Urbanavičius, L., et al.: How to assess intestinal viability during surgery: A review of techniques. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3, 59–69 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kudszus, S., et al.: Intraoperative laser fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a noninvasive analysis to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery 395, 1025–1030 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diana, M., et al.: Enhanced-reality video fluorescence: A real-time assessment of intestinal viability. Annals of Surgery 259(4), 700–707 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., Van Gool, L.: SURF: Speeded up robust features. In: Leonardis, A., Bischof, H., Pinz, A. (eds.) ECCV 2006, Part I. LNCS, vol. 3951, pp. 404–417. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Selka, F., Nicolau, S.A., Agnus, V., Bessaid, A., Marescaux, J., Soler, L.: Evaluation of endoscopic image enhancement for feature tracking: A new validation framework. In: Liao, H., Linte, C.A., Masamune, K., Peters, T.M., Zheng, G. (eds.) MIAR/AE-CAI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8090, pp. 75–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leutenegger, S., et al.: BRISK: Binary Robust invariant scalable keypoints. In: 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2548–2555 (November 2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yip, M., et al.: Tissue Tracking and Registration for Image-Guided Surgery. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 31, 2169–2182 (2012)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Puerto-Souza, G., Mariottini, G.: A Fast and Accurate Feature-Matching Algorithm for Minimally-Invasive Endoscopic Images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (January 2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schaefer, S., McPhail, T., Warren, J.: Image deformation using moving least squares. ACM Transactions on Graphics, TOG (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Diana, M., et al.: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (cellvizio) and enhanced-reality for real-time assessment of intestinal microcirculation at the future anastomotic site. Accepted to SAGES (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Selka
    • 1
    • 2
  • V. Agnus
    • 1
  • S. Nicolau
    • 1
  • A. Bessaid
    • 2
  • L. Soler
    • 1
    • 3
  • J. Marescaux
    • 1
    • 3
  • M. Diana
    • 3
  1. 1.IRCAD 1 Place de l’HopitalStrasbourgFrance
  2. 2.Biomedical Engineering LaboratoryAbou Bekr Belkaid UniversityAlgeria
  3. 3.IHU 1 Place de l’HopitalStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations