Skip to main content

Mathematical Skills Required to Fully Understand SEGMENT-Landslide

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Storm-triggered Landslides in Warmer Climates
  • 889 Accesses

Abstract

In this book, we suppose the reader has basic vector concept and for the convenience, listed the basic vector operations in the Appendix D. In the following discussion, we stick to the right-hand system. Suppose the unit directional vectors of a Cartesian system is \( {\widehat{e}}_1,\kern0.5em {\widehat{e}}_2\ \mathrm{and}\ {\widehat{e}}_3 \). Position vector \( \overrightarrow{x} \) (of a granular element), can be decomposed into the \( {\widehat{e}}_1,\kern0.5em {\widehat{e}}_2\ \mathrm{and}\ {\widehat{e}}_3 \) directions, so that \( \overrightarrow{x}={x}_1{\widehat{e}}_1+{x}_2{\widehat{e}}_2+{x}_3{\widehat{e}}_3 \). Now introduce a new Cartesian coordinate system, it is obtained by rotation of the original one. Unit vectors in the rotated system called \( {{\widehat{e}}_1}^{\hbox{'}},\kern0.5em {{\widehat{e}}_2}^{\hbox{'}}\ \mathrm{and}\ {{\widehat{e}}_3}^{\hbox{'}}. \) Then the same vector can be write in the new (rotated system) as: \( \overrightarrow{x}={x}_1^{\hbox{'}}{\widehat{e}}_1^{\hbox{'}}+{x}_2^{\hbox{'}}{\widehat{e}}_2^{\hbox{'}}+{x}_3^{\hbox{'}}{\widehat{e}}_3^{\hbox{'}}={\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^3{x}_i^{\hbox{'}}{\widehat{e}}_i^{\hbox{'}}} \). Generally speaking, x i  ≠ x ' i , i = 1,2,3. A natural question is how are the components of \( \overrightarrow{x} \) in the new system related to its components in the original one? Take x '2 for an example, \( {x}_2^{\hbox{'}}=\overrightarrow{x}\bullet {\widehat{e}}_2^{\hbox{'}}={\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^3{x}_i{\widehat{e}}_i}\cdot {\widehat{e}}_2^{\hbox{'}}={\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^3{x}_i\left|{\widehat{e}}_i\right|}\left|{\widehat{e}}_2^{\hbox{'}}\right| \cos \left({\widehat{e}}_i,{\widehat{e}}_2^{\hbox{'}}\right)={\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^3{x}_i}{C}_{i,2} \)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Proof of the equivalent of an adjoint based 4D-Var and a Kalman filter.

    The most important advantage of the 4D-Var is that if we assume that the forward model is perfect, and that the a priori error covariance at the initial time B 0 is correct, it can be shown that the 4D-Var analysis at the final time is identical to that of the extended Kalman Filter (Lorenc, 1986; Daley, 1991). This means that implicitly 4D-Var is able to evolve the forecast error covariance from B 0 to the final time.

    Daley, R., 1991. Atmospheric data analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, P457.

    Lorenc, A., 1986. Analysis methods for numerical weather prediction. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 11771194.

References

  • Arakawa A, Lamb V (1977) Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model. In: Chang J (ed) Methods in computational physics, vol 17. Academic, New York, NY, pp 174–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Arakawa A (1984) Boundary conditions in limited-area model. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 28 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Asselin R (1972) Frequency filter for time integration. Mon Weather Rev 100:487–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks R, Corey W (1964) Hydraulic properties of porous media, Hydrology Paper 3. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus G, Gilbert F (1970) Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross earth data. Phil Trans R Soc A 266:123–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley A, LeNir A (1983) QN-like variable storage conjugate gradients. Math Prog 27:155–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp RB, Hornberger GM (1978) Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties. Water Resour Res 14:601–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtier P, Talagrand O (1987) Variational assimilation of Meteorological observations with the adjoint equation. Part II: numerical results. Q J Roy Meteor Soc 113:1329–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Errico R (1997) What is an adjoint model? Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78:2577–2591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill PE, Murray W (1979) The numerical solution of a problem in the calculus of variations. In: Bell DJ (ed) Recent mathematical developments in control. Academic, London, pp 97–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Haltiner GJ, Williams RT (eds) (1980) Numerical weather prediction and dynamic meteorology, vol 2. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand F (1976) Advanced calculus for applications, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide K, Courtier P, Ghil M, Lorenc A (1997) Unified notation for data assimilation: operational, sequential and variational. J Meteor Soc Jpn 75:181–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KW, Bauer J, Riccardi GA, Droegemeier KK, Xue M (1994) Distributed processing of a regional prediction model. Mon Weather Rev 122:2558–2572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemp JB, Wilhelmson R (1978) The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics. J Atmos Sci 35:1070–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDimet FX, Talagrand O (1986) Variational algorithms for analysis and assimilation of meteorological observations-Theoretical aspects. Tellus 38A:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilly DK (1965) On the computational stability of numerical solutions of timedependent nonlinear geophysical fluid dynamics problems. Mon Weather Rev 93:11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Nocedal J (1989) On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Math Prog 45:503–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machenhauer B (1979) The spectral method. Numerical methods used in atmospheric models, Vol. II, GARP publications series no. 17, WMO/ICSU, Geneva, 502 pp. [Available from Secretariat of WMO, Case Postale No. 5, CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchuk GI (1981) Methods of computational mathematics. Springer, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchuk GI (1994) Adjoint equations and analysis of complex systems, vol 295, Mathematics and its applications. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin D (1995) Recent developments in hydrologic data assimilation. Rev Geophys 33(suppl):977–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesinger F, Arakawa A (1976) Numerical methods used in atmospherical models, vol 17, GARP Publication Series. WMO/ICSU Joint Organizing Committee, Geneva, pp 53–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Oran E, Boris J (1987) Numerical simulation of reactive flow. Elsevier, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips N (1959a) An example of nonlinear computational instability, The atmosphere and sea in motion, Rossby memorial volume. Rockefeller Institute Press, New York, NY, pp 501–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips N (1959b) Numerical integration of the prime equations. Mon Weather Rev 87:333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke R (1984) Mesoscale meteorological modeling. Academic, Orlando, FL, 611 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabier F, Courtier P, Pailleux J, Talagrand O, Vasiljevic D (1993) A comparison between four-dimensional variational assimilation and simplified sequential assimilation relying on three-dimensional variational analysis. Q J Roy Meteor Soc 119:845–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren D (2004) 4DVAR retrieval of prognostic land surface model variables for ARPS. University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, p 236

    Google Scholar 

  • Rood R (1987) Numerical advection algorithms and their role in atmospheric transport and chemistry models. Rev Geophys 25:71–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers WD (1965) Physical climatology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 272 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanno D, Phua K (1980) Remark on algorithm 500: minimization of unconstrained multivariate functions. ACM Trans Math Soft 6:618–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thacker W, Long RB (1988) Fitting dynamics to data. J Geophys Res 93:1227–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, O’Brien JJ (1991) Variational Estimation of the wind stress drag coefficient and the oceanic eddy viscosity profile. J Phy Ocean 21(709–719):1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupanski D (1997) A general weak constraint applicable to operational 4DVAR data assimilation systems. Mon Weather Rev 125:2274–2292

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ren, D. (2015). Mathematical Skills Required to Fully Understand SEGMENT-Landslide. In: Storm-triggered Landslides in Warmer Climates. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08518-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics