Skip to main content

Contents as Products in Media Markets

  • Chapter
Book cover Managing Media Firms and Industries

Abstract

Media products usually comprise two components: a nonmaterial element (journalistic, fiction, persuasive, etc., called content) and a material element (whereby the content is distributed and made accessible to consumers, typically referred to as a platform). While both components function in tandem in the market as regards meeting needs, consumer demand is primarily linked to content; the role of communication or transmission platforms is secondary in this regard, although they may be crucial to such concerns as accessibility (Murphy. How television invented new media. Rutgers University Press, 2011; Chun. Control and freedom: Power and paranoia in the age of fiber optic. MIT, 2006).

Hence, the distinguishing feature of media products as such is their capacity to meet the needs and satisfy the desires of potential consumers by providing information, persuasive communication, and entertainment contents. The material elements can influence what kinds of content can be offered and what demand can be fulfilled, but they do not create a demand per se that would be independent from the contents.

Based on this premise, the distinctive nature of media contents may be defined in relation to a set of key concepts that distinguish such contents from other products. On the one hand, these characteristics relate to the status of media products as economic goods, and on the other, such features stem from the special social and cultural significance of media products (Bates. The political economy of information (pp. 76–94). University of Wisconsin Press, 1988).

This chapter addresses media products as economic goods made available in the media market, wherein the management of such products is based on their distinctive nature. Thereafter, the conditions that shape innovation and the production of high-quality contents are explored. Finally, the relationship between contents and target audiences is analyzed because the latter are imbricated (arranged in an overlapping structure) in content management, and this is characteristic of such products from their very beginning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, M. (1985). Stardom and talent. American Economic Review, 75(1), 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aigrain, P. (1997). Attention, media, value and economics. First Monday, 2(9). Retrieved from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue2_9/index.html.

  • Albarran, A. (2010). The transformation of the media and communication industries. Pamplona: Media Market Monographs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, I. E. N. (1991). Desperately seeking the audience. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aris, A., & Bughin, J. (2005). Managing media companies.Harnessing creative value. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, B. J. (1988). Information as an economic good: Sources of individual and social value. In V. Mosco & J. Wasko (Eds.), The political economy of information (pp. 76–94). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S., & Waldfogel, J. (2010). Product quality and market size. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 58, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogart, L. (2004). Reflections on content quality in newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal, 25(1), 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordewijk, J., & van Kaam, B. (1986). Towards a new classification of tele-information services. Intermedia, 14(1), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. (2006). Tapping into TiVo: Digital video recorders and the transition from schedules to surveillance in television. New Media & Society, 2(8), 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. (2000). Creative industries. Contracts between art and commerce (p. vii). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, W. H. K. (2006). Control and freedom: Power and paranoia in the age of fiber optic. Hong Kong: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costera, M. I. (2005). Impact or content? Ratings vs. quality in Public Television. European Journal of Communication, 20(1), 27–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby, M., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J., & Rees-Mogg, W. (1997). The sovereign individual: How to survive and thrive during the collapse of the welfare state. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, G. (2002). Understanding media economics. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, G. (2010). From Television to multi-platform: Less form more or more from less? Convergence, 16(4), 431–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2010). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. E., & Greenberg, M. (1980). The public’s use of television: who watches and why. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershon, R. (1997). The Transnational Media Corporation: Global messages and the free market competition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburgh, V., & Weyers, S. (1999). On the perceived quality of movies. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23, 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, M. H. (1997). The attention economy and the net. First Monday, 2(4). Retrieved from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue2_4/goldhaber/.

  • Hasebrink, U. (2011). Giving the audience a voice: The role of research in making media regulation more responsive to the needs of the audience. Journal of Information Policy, 1, 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, M. (2003). Programming and direct viewer payment for Television. Pamplona: Media Markets Monogaphs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V. (2006). Click to connect: Netnography and tribal advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 46(3), 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanham, R. A. (2006). The economics of attention. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. (2006). Managing people and organizations in changing contexts. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. M. (1988). The economics of rising stars. American Economic Review, 78, 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, M. (2009). Creating, producing and selling TV shows. The case of the most popular dramedies in Spain. Lisbon: Media xxi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. (2011). How television invented new media. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, P. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, P. (2001). The audience product and the new media environment: Implications for the economics of media industries. Journal on Media Management, 3(11), 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. (2012). Free TV: File-sharing and the value of television. Television and New Media, 13(6), 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, A., & Iglesias, F. (2000). Empresa Informativa (2nd ed.). Barcelona: Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D. G. (1992). Ingredient branding: A strategy option with multiples beneficiaries. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual, J., Navia, C. (1995). Una aproximación a la predicción de audiencias: panel de valoración de programas. 11° Seminario de Audiencia de Televisión, 69° Seminario de AEDEMO, pp. 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (2011). Mapping digital media: Digitization and media business models. Open Society Media Program, 5, p 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (2000). Measuring media content, quality, and diversity: Approaches and issues in content research. Turku, Finland: Turku School of Economics and Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (1989). Media economics. Concepts and issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review, 78, 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H. (2009). Market rebels. How activists make or break the rules of the game. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1981). The economics of superstars. American Economic Review, 73, 757–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, R. (1995). Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal, 16(Summer), 135–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. (1999). The control revolution. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siapera, E. (2004). From couch potatoes to cybernauts? The expanding notion of the audience on TV channels’ websites. New Media & Society, 6, 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Portfolio Trade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, R., & Mahajan, V. (1997). Products with branded components: An approach for premium and partner selection. Marketing Science, 16(2), 146–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund, M., Rajala, R., & Leminen, S. (2011). Insights into the dynamics of business models in the media industry. In Next Media. Finland: TIVIT. March 8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mercedes Medina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Medina, M., Sánchez-Tabernero, A., Arrese, Á. (2016). Contents as Products in Media Markets. In: Lowe, G., Brown, C. (eds) Managing Media Firms and Industries. Media Business and Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08515-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics