Skip to main content

Treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a relatively rare cancer, with an estimated 8000 new cases per year in the United States. In the Western world, approximately 95% of patients with HL have a classical HL histology, whereas only 5% have the nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL (NLPHL) histologic subtype. The majority of patients are diagnosed in their late 20s to early 30s, with a fewer patients being diagnosed at a later age. HL is a B-cell lymphoid malignancy, originating from germinal center B lymphocytes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Stein H, et al. A revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: a proposal from the International Lymphoma Study Group. Blood. 1994;84:1361-1392.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Younes A, Carbone A. Clinicopathologic and molecular features of Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cancer Biol Ther. 2003;2:500-507.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Engert A, Plutschow A, Eich HT, et al. Reduced treatment intensity in patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:640-652.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eich HT, Diehl V, Gorgen H, et al. Intensified chemotherapy and dose-reduced involved-field radiotherapy in patients with early unfavorable Hodgkin’s lymphoma: final analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group HD11 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4199-4206.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Younes A. Early-stage hodgkin’s lymphoma: in pursuit of perfection. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:895-896.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Canellos GP, Abramson JS, Fisher DC, LaCasce AS. Treatment of favorable, limited-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma with chemotherapy without consolidation by radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1611-1615.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Straus DJ, Portlock CS, Qin J. Results of a prospective randomized clinical trial of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) followed by radiation therapy (RT) versus ABVD alone for stages I, II, and IIIA nonbulky Hodgkin disease. Blood. 2004;104:3483-3489.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Radford J, Barrington S, Counsell N, et al. Involved field radiotherapy versus no further treatment in patients with clinical stages IA and IIA Hodgkin lymphoma and a ‘negative’ PET scan after 3 cycles ABVD. Results of the UK NCRI RAPID Trial. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2012;120:a547.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andre MPE, Reman O, Federico M, et al. Interim analysis of the randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL Intergroup H10 trial on early PET-scan driven treatment adaptation in stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2012;120:a549.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bartlett NL, Rosenberg SA. Brief chemotherapy, Stanford V, and adjuvant radiotherapy for bulky or advanced-stage Hodgkin’s disease: a preliminary report. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:1080-1088.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoskin PJ, Lowry L, Horwich A, et al. Randomized comparison of the stanford V regimen and ABVD in the treatment of advanced Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Lymphoma Group Study ISRCTN 64141244. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5390-5396.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon LI, Hong F, Fisher RI, et al. Randomized phase III trial of ABVD versus Stanford V with or without radiation therapy in locally extensive and advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: an intergroup study coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2496). J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:684-691.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Diehl V, Sieber M, Ruffer U, et al. BEACOPP: an intensified chemotherapy regimen in advanced Hodgkin’s disease. The German Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group. Ann Oncol. 1997;8:143-148.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Viviani S, Zinzani PL, Rambaldi A, et al. ABVD versus BEACOPP for Hodgkin’s lymphoma when high-dose salvage is planned. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:203-212.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Connors JM. Hodgkin’s lymphoma–the great teacher. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:264-265.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carde PP, Karrasch M, Fortpied C, et al. ABVD (8 cycles) versus BEACOPP (4 escalated cycles => 4 baseline) in stage III-IV high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma (HL): First results of EORTC 20012 Intergroup randomized phase III clinical trial. J Clin Onc. 2012;30:(suppl)abstr 8002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lazarus HM, Rowlings PA, Zhang MJ, et al. Autotransplants for Hodgkin’s disease in patients never achieving remission: a report from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:534-545.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andre M, Henry-Amar M, Pico JL, et al. Comparison of high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation with conventional therapy for Hodgkin’s disease induction failure: a case-control study. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:222-229.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Linch DC, Winfield D, Goldstone AH, et al. Dose intensification with autologous bone-marrow transplantation in relapsed and resistant Hodgkin’s disease: results of a BNLI randomised trial. Lancet. 1993;341:1051-1054.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schmitz N, Pfistner B, Sextro M, et al. Aggressive conventional chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy with autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation for relapsed chemosensitive Hodgkin’s disease: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2065-2071.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pfreundschuh MG, Ruffer U, Lathan B, et al. Dexa-BEAM in patients with Hodgkin’s disease refractory to multidrug chemotherapy regimens: a trial of the German Hodgkin’s Disease Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:580-586.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Colwill R, Crump M, Couture F, et al. Mini-BEAM as salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s disease before intensive therapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:396-402.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Martin A, Fernandez-Jimenez MC, Caballero MD, et al. Long-term follow-up in patients treated with Mini-BEAM as salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s disease. Br J Haematol. 2001;113:161-171.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rodriguez J, Rodriguez MA, Fayad L, et al. ASHAP: a regimen for cytoreduction of refractory or recurrent Hodgkin’s disease. Blood. 1999;93:3632-3626.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ribrag V, Nasr F, Bouhris JH, et al. VIP (etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatinum) as a salvage intensification program in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s disease. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998;21:969-974.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Josting A, Rudolph C, Resier M, et al. Time-intensified dexamethasone/cisplatin/cytarabine: an effective salvage therapy with low toxicity in patients with relapsed and refractory Hodgkin’s disease. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1628-1635.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Baetz T, Belch A, Couban S, et al. Gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin is an active and non-toxic chemotherapy regimen in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s disease: a phase II study by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:1762-1767.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chau I, Harries M, Cunningham D, et al. Gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone chemotherapy (GEM-P) is an effective regimen in patients with poor prognostic primary progressive or multiply relapsed Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2003;120:970-977.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ferme C, Mounier D, Divine, et al. Intensive salvage therapy with high-dose chemotherapy for patients with advanced Hodgkin’s disease in relapse or failure after initial chemotherapy: results of the Groupe d’Etudes des Lymphomes de l’Adulte H89 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:467-475.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Proctor SJ, Jackson GH, Lennard A, et al. Strategic approach to the management of Hodgkin’s disease incorporating salvage therapy with high-dose ifosfamide, etoposide and epirubicin: a Northern Region Lymphoma Group study (UK). Ann Oncol. 2003;14:i47-i50.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bonfante V, Viviani S, Devizzi L, et al. High-dose ifosfamide and vinorelbine as salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s disease. Eur J Haematol Suppl. 2001;64:51-55.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Arai S, Fanale M, DeVos S, et al. Defining a Hodgkin lymphoma population for novel therapeutics after relapse from autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Leuk Lymphoma. 2013;54:2531-2533.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Younes A, Barlett NL, Leonard JP, et al. Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) for relapsed CD30-positive lymphomas. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1812-1821.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Katz J, Janik JE, Younes A. Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35). Clin Cancer Res. 2011;/17:6428-6436.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Younes A, Gopal AK, Smith SE, et al. Results of a pivotal phase II study of brentuximab vedotin for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2183-2189.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Younes A, Connors JM, Park SI, et al. Brentuximab vedotin combined with ABVD or AVD for patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1348-1356.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moskowitz AJ, Schoder H, Yahalom J, et al. PET-adapted sequential salvage therapy with brentuximab vedotin followed by augmented ifosamide, carboplatin, and etoposide for patients with relapsed and refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a non-randomised, open-label, single-centre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:284-292.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Moskowitz CH, Nademanee A, Masszi T, et al. Brentuximab vedotin as consolidation therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma at risk of relapse or progression (AETHERA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2015;385:1853-1862.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yamamoto R, Nishikori M, Kitawaki T, et al. PD-1-PD-1 ligand interaction contributes to immunosuppressive microenvironment of Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2008;111:3220-3224.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Green MR, Monti S, Rodig SJ, et al. Integrative analysis reveals selective 9p24.1 amplification, increased PD-1 ligand expression, and further induction via JAK2 in nodular sclerosing Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2010;116:3268-3277.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ansell SM, Lesokhin AM, Borrello I, et al. PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:311-319.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Moskowitz CH, Ribrag V, Michot J-M, et al. PD-1 blockade with the monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma after brentuximab vedotin failure: preliminary results from a phase 1b study (KEYNOTE-013). Blood. 2014;124:290.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Younes, A. (2016). Treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma. In: Younes, A. (eds) Handbook of Lymphoma. Adis, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08467-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08467-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Adis, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08466-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08467-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics