Skip to main content

By Sport Predictions Through Socio Economic Factors and Tradition in Summer Olympic Games: The Case of London 2012

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Social Networks and the Economics of Sports

Abstract

Socio-economic prediction of medals for London 2012 is performed “by sport” using OLS and a discretization routine. The success ratio is above 65 % for any given sports, especially for disciplines that award more than 30 medals. At the overall country level, the success raises above 85 %. The analysis of the award winning process by sports shed also new light about the critical factors that might dictate the success and that are liable to set sport policies, including the development of sound social networks and the investment on sport infrastructures to foster talent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We have also done the significance analysis with the two original models to demonstrate the higher potential for analysis of the proposed model (see Appendix). In the JA model, the variables with predictive power are GDPCAP and POP as well as MED to account for size of the sport or number of medals to be awarded. HOST and FROST also play an important role. In the Pfau model, \(MShare_{t-1}\) accounts for tradition in basically all of the sports as well as POP. It is very difficult for newcomer countries to win medals unless the medals are bought via nationalization [16]. The models might also be compared, in terms of full explanation, as measured by the adjusted correlation coefficient; both the Pfau model and the “by sport” summer model perform better than the JA model.

References

  1. Balmer, N. J., Nevil, A. M., & Williams, M. (2001). Home advantage in the Winter Olympics (1908–1998). Journal of Sport Sciences, 19, 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bale J., Sang J. (1996) Kenyan running. Movement culture, geography and global change. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard, A. B., & Busse, M. R. (2004). Who wins the Olympic Games: Economic resources and medal totals. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 413–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brownlie, L. W., & Kyle, C. R. (2012). Evidence that skin suits affects long track speed skating performance. Enginnering of Sport Conference Book Series, 34, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davidson, R., Richard, C., & Williams, A. M. (2009). The use of sports science in preparation for Olympic competition. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 1363–1365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Forrest, D., Sanz, I., & Tena, J. D. (2010). Forecasting national team medal totals at the Summer Olympic Games. International Journal of Forecasting, 26, 576–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gratton, C., & Preuss, H. (2008). Maximizing Olympic impacts by bulding up legacies. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 25, 1922–1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grimes, A. R., Kelly, W. J., & Rubin, P. H. (1974). A socioeconomic model of national Olympic performance. Social Science Quarterly, 55, 777–782.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haaker, S. J. (2009). The impact of technology on sporting performance in Olympic sports. Journal of Sport Sciences, 27, 1421–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, D. K. N., & Ali, A. (2004). A tale of two seasons: Participation and medal counts at the Summer and Winter Olympic Games. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 974–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuper, G. H., & Sterken, E. (2010). Who is going to win in Vancouver?. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Third International Sport Business Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lessnann, S., Sung, M. C., Johnson, J. E. V., & Ma, T. J. (2012). A new methodology for generating and combining statistical forecasting models to enhance competitive event prediction. European Journal of Operational Research, 218, 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Otamendi, F. J., & Doncel, L. M. (2014). Medal shares in winter olympic games by sport: Socio economic analysis after Vancouver 2010. Social Science Quaterly, 95, 598–614. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12055

  14. Pfau, W. D. (2006). Predicting the medal wins by country at the 2006 Winter Olympic Games: An econometric approach. The Korea Economic Review, 22, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scheibehenne, B., & Broader, A. (2007). Predicting Wimbledon 2005 tennis results by mere player name recognition. International Journal of Forecasting, 23, 415–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shachar, A. (2011). Picking winners: Olympic citizenship and the global race for talent. Yale Law Journal, 120, 2088–2139.

    Google Scholar 

  17. SIRC (Sport Industry Research Centre). (2002). European sporting success. A study of the development of medal winning elites in five European countries. Final Report. Shefield: SIRC.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Suzuki, A. K., Salasar, L. E. B., Leite, J. K., & Louzada-Neto, F. (2010). A Bayesian approach for predicting match outcomes: The 2006 (Association) Football World Cup. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 1530–1539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vaeyens, R., Güllich, A., Warr, C. R., & Phillippaerts, R. (2009). Talent identification and promotion programmes of Olympic Athletes. Journal of Sport Sciences, 27, 1367–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. van Bottenburg, M., & Wilterdink, N. (2004). Globalization, inequality and Olympic sport success. Thessaloniki, Greece: Pre-Olympic Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  21. van Tuyckon, C., & Joreskog, K. G. (2012). Going for gold! Welfare characteristics and Olympic success: An application of the structural equation approach. Quality and Quantity, 46, 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Williams, A. M., & Ford, P. R. (2009). Promoting a skills-based agenda in Olympic sports: The role of skill-acquisition specialists. Journal of Sport Sciences, 27, 1381–1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Javier Otamendi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Otamendi, F.J., Doncel, L.M. (2014). By Sport Predictions Through Socio Economic Factors and Tradition in Summer Olympic Games: The Case of London 2012. In: Pardalos, P., Zamaraev, V. (eds) Social Networks and the Economics of Sports. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08440-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics