Abstract
Cylindrical algebraic decompositions (CADs) are a key tool for solving problems in real algebraic geometry and beyond. We recently presented a new CAD algorithm combining two advances: truth-table invariance, making the CAD invariant with respect to the truth of logical formulae rather than the signs of polynomials; and CAD construction by regular chains technology, where first a complex decomposition is constructed by refining a tree incrementally by constraint. We here consider how best to formulate problems for input to this algorithm. We focus on a choice (not relevant for other CAD algorithms) about the order in which constraints are presented. We develop new heuristics to help make this choice and thus allow the best use of the algorithm in practice. We also consider other choices of problem formulation for CAD, as discussed in CICM 2013, revisiting these in the context of the new algorithm.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arnon, D., Collins, G.E., McCallum, S.: Cylindrical algebraic decomposition I: The basic algorithm. SIAM J. Comput. 13, 865–877 (1984)
Arnon, D.S., Mignotte, M.: On mechanical quantifier elimination for elementary algebra and geometry. J. Symb. Comp. 5(1-2), 237–259 (1988)
Bradford, R., Chen, C., Davenport, J.H., England, M., Moreno Maza, M., Wilson, D.: Truth table invariant cylindrical algebraic decomposition by regular chains (submitted, 2014), Preprint: http://opus.bath.ac.uk/38344/
Bradford, R., Davenport, J.H., England, M., McCallum, S., Wilson, D.: Cylindrical algebraic decompositions for boolean combinations. In: Proc. ISSAC 2013, pp. 125–132. ACM (2013)
Bradford, R., Davenport, J.H., England, M., McCallum, S., Wilson, D.: Truth table invariant cylindrical algebraic decomposition (submitted, 2014), Preprint: http://opus.bath.ac.uk/38146/
Bradford, R., Davenport, J.H., England, M., Wilson, D.: Optimising problem formulation for cylindrical algebraic decomposition. In: Carette, J., Aspinall, D., Lange, C., Sojka, P., Windsteiger, W. (eds.) CICM 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7961, pp. 19–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Brown, C.W., Davenport, J.H.: The complexity of quantifier elimination and cylindrical algebraic decomposition. In: Proc. ISSAC 2007, pp. 54–60. ACM (2007)
Brown, C.W., El Kahoui, M., Novotni, D., Weber, A.: Algorithmic methods for investigating equilibria in epidemic modelling. J. Symbolic Computation 41, 1157–1173 (2006)
Chen, C., Moreno Maza, M.: An incremental algorithm for computing cylindrical algebraic decompositions. In: Proc. ASCM 2012. Springer (2012) (to appear), Preprint: arXiv:1210.5543v1
Chen, C., Moreno Maza, M., Xia, B., Yang, L.: Computing cylindrical algebraic decomposition via triangular decomposition. In: Proc. ISSAC 2009, pp. 95–102. ACM (2009)
Collins, G.E.: Quantifier elimination for real closed fields by cylindrical algebraic decomposition. In: Brakhage, H. (ed.) GI-Fachtagung 1975. LNCS, vol. 33, pp. 134–183. Springer, Heidelberg (1975)
Collins, G.E.: Quantifier elimination by cylindrical algebraic decomposition – 20 years of progress. In: Quantifier Elimination and Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition. Texts & Monographs in Symbolic Computation, pp. 8–23. Springer (1998)
Collins, G.E., Hong, H.: Partial cylindrical algebraic decomposition for quantifier elimination. J. Symb. Comp. 12, 299–328 (1991)
Davenport, J.H., Bradford, R., England, M., Wilson, D.: Program verification in the presence of complex numbers, functions with branch cuts etc. In: Proc. SYNASC 2012, pp. 83–88. IEEE (2012)
Dolzmann, A., Seidl, A., Sturm, T.: Efficient projection orders for CAD. In: Proc. ISSAC 2004, pp. 111–118. ACM (2004)
England, M., Bradford, R., Davenport, J.H., Wilson, D.: Understanding Branch Cuts of Expressions. In: Carette, J., Aspinall, D., Lange, C., Sojka, P., Windsteiger, W. (eds.) CICM 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7961, pp. 136–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
England, M.: An implementation of CAD in Maple utilising problem formulation, equational constraints and truth-table invariance. Uni. Bath, Dept. Comp. Sci. Tech. Report Series, 2013-04 (2013), http://opus.bath.ac.uk/35636/
Fotiou, I.A., Parrilo, P.A., Morari, M.: Nonlinear parametric optimization using cylindrical algebraic decomposition. In: Proc. CDC-ECC 2005, pp. 3735–3740 (2005)
Iwane, H., Yanami, H., Anai, H., Yokoyama, K.: An effective implementation of a symbolic-numeric cylindrical algebraic decomposition for quantifier elimination. In: Proc. SNC 2009, pp. 55–64 (2009)
Kahan, W.: Problem #9: an ellipse problem. SIGSAM Bull. 9(3), 11–12 (1975)
McCallum, S.: On projection in CAD-based quantifier elimination with equational constraint. In: Proc. ISSAC 1999, pp. 145–149. ACM (1999)
Paulson, L.C.: MetiTarski: Past and future. In: Beringer, L., Felty, A. (eds.) ITP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7406, pp. 1–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Schwartz, J.T., Sharir, M.: On the “Piano-Movers” Problem: II. General techniques for computing topological properties of real algebraic manifolds. Adv. Appl. Math. 4, 298–351 (1983)
Strzeboński, A.: Cylindrical algebraic decomposition using validated numerics. J. Symb. Comp. 41(9), 1021–1038 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
England, M., Bradford, R., Chen, C., Davenport, J.H., Maza, M.M., Wilson, D. (2014). Problem Formulation for Truth-Table Invariant Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition by Incremental Triangular Decomposition. In: Watt, S.M., Davenport, J.H., Sexton, A.P., Sojka, P., Urban, J. (eds) Intelligent Computer Mathematics. CICM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8543. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08434-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08434-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08433-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08434-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)