Advertisement

A Semi-active Control System for Wind Turbines

  • N. CaterinoEmail author
  • C. T. Georgakis
  • F. Trinchillo
  • A. Occhiuzzi
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Industrial Control book series (AIC)

Abstract

A semi-active (SA) control system based on the use of smart magnetorheological (MR) dampers to control the structural response of a wind turbine is proposed herein. The innovative approach is based on the implementation and use of a variable-properties base restraint. This is able to modify in real time its mechanical properties according to the instantaneous decision of a given control logic, the latter addressed to control one or more structural response parameters. The smart base restraint is thought to be a combination of a smooth hinge, elastic springs, large-scale adjustable MR dampers, and a control algorithm that instantaneously commands the latter during the motion, making them to modulate the reactive force as needed to achieve the performance goals. The design and operation of such a system are shown with reference to a case study consisting of an almost 100 m tall wind turbine, realized in a 1/20 scale model at the Denmark Technical University (DTU). Shaking table tests have been performed under the action of two different types of wind loads and by using two purposely written control logics, highlighting the high effectiveness of the proposed SA control technique and encouraging to further investigate in such direction.

Keywords

Semi-active control Wind turbine Magnetorheological damper Smart material Control algorithm 

References

  1. 1.
    Kirkegaard PH, Nielsen SRK, Poulsen BL, Andersen J, Pedersen LH, Pedersen BJ (2002) Semiactive vibration control of wind turbine tower using an MR damper, structural dynamics: EURODYN 2002. Balkema Publishers A.A., Taylor and Francis, Netherlands, Rotterdam, pp 1575–1580Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karimi HR, Zapateiro M, Luo N (2010) Semiactive vibration control of offshore wind turbine towers with tuned liquid column dampers using h output feedback control. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on control applications, Yokohama, JapanGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Luo N, Bottasso CL, Karimi HR, Zapateiro M (2011) Semiactive control for floating offshore wind turbines subject to aero-hydro dynamic loads. In: Proceedings of international conference on renewable energies and power quality—ICREPQ 2011, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, SpainGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luo N (2011) Smart structural control strategies for the dynamic load mitigation in floating offshore wind turbines. In: Proceedings of international workshop on advanced smart materials and smart structures technology—ANCRiSST, Dalian, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luo N (2012) Analysis of offshore support structure dynamics and vibration control of floating wind turbines. USTC J 42(5):1–8Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luo N, Pacheco L, Vidal Y, Li H (2012) Smart structural control strategies for offshore wind power generation with floating wind turbines. In: Proceedings of international conference on renewable energies and power quality—ICREPQ 2012, Santiago de Compostela, SpainGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luo N, Pacheco L, Vidal Y, Zapateiro M (2012) Dynamic load mitigation for floating offshore wind turbines supported by structures with mooring lines. In: Proceedings of european conference on structural control—EACS, Genova, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arrigan J, Pakrashi V, Basu B, Nagarajaiah S (2011) Control of flapwise vibrations in wind turbine blades using semi-active tuned mass dampers. Struct Control Health Monit 18:840–851. doi: 10.1002/stc.404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rodríguez TA, Carcangiu CE, Amo I, Martin M, Fischer T, Kuhnle B, Scheu M (2011) Wind turbine tower load reduction using passive and semi-active dampers. In: Proceedings of the european wind energy conference—EWEC 2011, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luenberger DG (1979) Introduction to dynamic systems. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moore BC (1976) On the flexibility offered by state feedback in multivariable systems beyond closed loop eigenvalue assignment. IEEE Trans Autom Control 21:689–692Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen J, Georgakis CT (2013) Tuned rolling-ball dampers for vibration control in wind turbines. J Sound Vib 332:5271–5282. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.05.019
  13. 13.
    Chen J, Georgakis CT (2013) Spherical tuned liquid damper for vibration control in wind turbines. J Vib Control, SAGE Pbs. doi: 10.1177/1077546313495911
  14. 14.
    Caterino N, Spizzuoco M, Occhiuzzi A (2011) Understanding and modeling the physical behavior of magnetorheological dampers for seismic structural control. Smart Mater Struct 20:065013. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/20/6/065013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Occhiuzzi A, Spizzuoco M, Serino G (2003) Experimental analysis of magnetorheological dampers for structural control. Smart Mater Struct 12:703–711. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/12/5/306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carlson JD, Jolly MR (2000) MR fluid, foam and elastomer devices. Mechatronics 10:555–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Caterino N, Spizzuoco M, Occhiuzzi A (2013) Promptness and dissipative capacity of MR dampers: experimental investigations. Struct Control Health Monit 20(12):1424–1440. doi: 10.1002/stc.1578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Caterino N, Spizzuoco M, Occhiuzzi A (2014) Shaking table testing of a steel frame structure equipped with semi-active MR dampers: comparison of control algorithms, Smart Struct Syst, Technopress (in press)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Occhiuzzi A (2009) Additional viscous dampers for civil structures: analysis of design methods based on modal damping ratios. Eng Struct 31(5):1093–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Larsen TJ, Hansen AM (2008) HAWC2 user manual. Risø National Laboratory, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, DenmarkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Caterino
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. T. Georgakis
    • 2
  • F. Trinchillo
    • 1
  • A. Occhiuzzi
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Naples “Parthenope”NaplesItaly
  2. 2.Technical University of Denmark (DTU)CopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations