Skip to main content

Young Children’s Understanding of Social Norms and Social Institutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women and Children as Victims and Offenders: Background, Prevention, Reintegration

Abstract

Children are born into a world abundant with social norms that prescribe how one should and should not behave. Social norms also form the basis of more complex social institutions such as ownership that create obligations, rights and duties. As adults we typically navigate our social world effortlessly and mostly unaware of the intricate web of social norms and institutions shaping our behaviour. But when and how do young children first become aware of the norms and institutions of their socio-cultural group? In this chapter, we will first provide a definition of social norms and institutions and explain their most important characteristics. We will then present empirical evidence that children as young as 3 years of age already understand some crucial aspects of social norms. We will further use the example of ownership to argue that it is one of the first social institutions that young children understand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bentham, J. (1894). Theory of legislation. London: Trübner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicchieri, C., & Muldoon, R. (2014). Social norms. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/social-norms/.

  • Blake, P. R., Ganea, P. A., & Harris, P. L. (2012). Possession is not always the law: With age, preschoolers increasingly use verbal information to identify who owns what. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, P., & Harris, P. (2009). Children’s understanding of ownership transfers. Cognitive Development, 24(2), 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, P., & Harris, P. (2011). Early representations of ownership. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(132), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman, J. (1994). The myth of property: Toward an egalitarian theory of ownership. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 148–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2011). Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 1149–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., & Munn, P. (1987). Development of justification in disputes with mother and sibling. Developmental Psychology, 23, 791–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasig, L. G. (2000). Toddlers’ understanding of ownership: Implications for self-concept development. Social Development, 9, 370–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, O. (2008). First possession: An assumption guiding inferences about who owns what. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 290–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, O., & Neary, K. R. (2008). Determining who owns what: Do children infer ownership from first possession? Cognition, 107, 829–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, O., van de Vondervoort, J. W., Defeyter, M., & Neary, K. R. (2013). First possession, history, and young children’s ownership judgments. Child Development, 84, 1519–1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A., Manczak, E. M., & Noles, N. S. (2012). The nonobvious basis of ownership: Preschool children trace the history and value of owned objects. Child Development, 83, 1732–1747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. (1992). On social facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göckeritz, S., Schmidt, M. F. H., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Young children’s creation and transmission of social norms. Cognitive Development, 30, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gräfenhain, M., Behne, T., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Young children’s understanding of joint commitments. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1430–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gräfenhain, M., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Three-year-olds’ understanding of the consequences of joint commitments. PLoS One, 8(9), e73039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Random House LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, K., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Children’s developing commitments to joint goals. Child Development, 83, 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. F. (2006). Yours and mine: Toddlers’ talk about possessions with familiar peers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. F., Hurst, S., Waters, C., & Chadwick, A. (2011). Infants’ use of force to defend toys: The origins of instrumental aggression. Infancy, 16, 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. F., & Ross, H. S. (1982). The social nature of early conflict. Child Development, 53, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honoré, A. M. (1961). Ownership. In Oxford essays in jurisprudence (pp. 107–147). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, J. (1993). Judgments about the right to property from preschool to adulthood. Law and Human Behaviour, 17, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1739/2000). A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalish, C. (1998). Reasons and causes: Children’s understanding of conformity to social rules and physical laws. Child Development, 69, 706–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalish, C., & Anderson, C. (2011). Ownership as a social status. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(132), 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanngiesser, P., Gjersoe, N., & Hood, B. M. (2010). The effect of creative labor on property-ownership transfer by preschool children and adults. Psychological Science, 21, 1236–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanngiesser, P., & Hood, B. M. (2014). Young children’s understanding of ownership rights for newly made objects. Cognitive Development, 29, 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanngiesser, P., Hood, B. M., & Itakura, S. (2014). The effect of labour on ownership decisions in two cultures: Developmental evidence from Japan and the UK. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32, 320–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanngiesser, P., Itakura, S., Zhou, Y., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hood, B. (2015a). The role of social eye-gaze in children’s and adults’ ownership attributions to robotic agents in three cultures. Interaction Studies, 16(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanngiesser, P., Rossano, F., & Tomasello, M. (2015b). Late emergence of the first possession ownership heuristic: Evidence from a small-scale culture. Child Development, 86, 1282–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M., & Smetana, J. (2013). Handbook of moral development (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Kalish, C. W. (2009). Children’s ascription of property rights with changes of ownership. Cognitive Development, 24, 322–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancekivell, S. E., & Friedman, O. (2014). Preschoolers selectively infer history when explaining outcomes: Evidence from explanations of ownership, liking, and use. Child Development, 85, 1236–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neary, K. R., & Friedman, O. (2014). Young children give priority to ownership when judging who should use an object. Child Development, 85, 326–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1932). The moral development of the child. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainbolt, G. W. (2006). The concept of rights. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakoczy, H. (2008). Taking fiction seriously: Young children understand the normative structure of joint pretence games. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakoczy, H., & Schmidt, M. F. H. (2013). The early ontogeny of social norms. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). The sources of normativity: young children’s awareness of the normative structure of games. Developmental Psychology, 44, 875–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgon, M., & Rashman, S. (1976). Expression of owner-owned relationships among holophrastic 14- to 32-month-old children. Child Development, 47, 1219–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. (1996). Negotiating principles of entitlement in sibling property disputes. Developmental Psychology, 32, 90–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. S. (2013). Effects of ownership rights on conflicts between toddler peers. Infancy, 18, 256–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H., Martin, J., Perlman, M., Smith, M., Blackmore, E., & Hunter, J. (1996). Autonomy and authority in the resolution of sibling disputes. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1996(73), 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H., Tesla, C., Kenyon, B., & Lollis, S. (1990). Maternal intervention in toddler peer conflict: The socialization of principles of justice. Developmental Psychology, 26, 994–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossano, F., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children’s understanding of violations of property rights. Cognition, 121, 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossano, F., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Preschoolers’ understanding of trash and the relinquishing of property. Manuscript submitted for publication

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. F. H., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children attribute normativity to novel actions without pedagogy or normative language. Developmental Science, 14, 530–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. F. H., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Young children enforce social norms selectively depending on the violator’s group affiliation. Cognition, 124, 325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. F. H., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Young children understand and defend the entitlements of others. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 930–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. F. H., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Young children enforce social norms. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 232–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1996). The construction of social reality. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shantz, C. U. (1987). Conflicts between children. Child Development, 58, 283–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, A., Li, V., & Olson, K. R. (2012). Children apply principles of physical ownership to ideas. Cognitive Science, 36, 1383–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A. (1991). Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. W. (2010). Property law: Rules, policies & practices (5th ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G. (1981). Preschool children’s conceptions of moral and social rules. Child Development, 52, 1333–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snare, F. (1972). The concept of property. American Philosophical Quarterly, 9, 200–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1998). One child’s early talk about possession. Typological Studies in Language, 36, 349–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10, 121–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Melis, A. P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E., & Herrmann, E. (2012). Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation. Current Anthropology, 53, 673–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., & Vaish, A. (2013). Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge. Morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, K. L. (1990). Mimesis as make-believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyman, E., & Rakoczy, H. (2011). Social conventions, institutions, and human uniqueness: Lessons from children and chimpanzees. In: Interdisciplinary anthropology (pp. 131–156). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyman, E., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Normativity and context in young children’s pretend play. Cognitive Development, 24, 146–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Kanngiesser .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kanngiesser, P., Schmidt, M.F.H., Rossano, F. (2016). Young Children’s Understanding of Social Norms and Social Institutions. In: Kury, H., Redo, S., Shea, E. (eds) Women and Children as Victims and Offenders: Background, Prevention, Reintegration. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08398-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08398-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08397-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08398-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics