Abstract
Most large scale comparative studies on homicide analyses total victimisation rates. Well-known exceptions include historical data-series from Veli Verkko, which showed that the higher the level of violence, the smaller the share of female victims and perpetrators. Consequently also the increases and decreases in lethal violence touch more male victims and perpetrators than female victims and perpetrators. This chapter tests these hypotheses and discusses the current differences in male and female homicide mortality levels with the most extensive available data today. The contribution draws a detailed picture of female and male homicide trends across regions and countries from 1950 to 2010. It furthermore explores the associations between femicide and homicide rates and female-male victimisation ratios and different socio-economic, political and cultural factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
During the period we examined all the included countries used ICD-classification (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, published by the World Health Organization) or its national adaptations in their cause-of-death statistics. The ICD-classification changed three times during the review period: from ICD-7 to ICD-8 in 1968–1970, from ICD-8 to ICD-9 in 1979–1995, and from ICD-9 to ICD-10 in the years following 1994. The changes took place in different years in different countries. Changes in the definition of a death caused by an intentional assault in all four classifications were, however, negligible. Earlier analyses suggest that the first classification change from ICD-7 to ICD-8 influenced infanticide levels but not other child or adult homicide levels in some industrialised countries (Jason et al. 1983). The later classification changes seem not to have had any effect even on infanticide levels (Ellonen et al. 2014).
- 5.
These kinds of changes when known have been reported in the detailed data source descriptions (see Lehti 2013).
- 6.
For example, in Norway, infanticides made up in the 1880s 73 %, in the 1950s 7 %, in the 2000s 2 % of female homicide deaths; in Switzerland the figures for the 1950s and 2000s were 28 % and 4 %, in Sweden 10 % and 2 %, and in England and Wales 11 % and 2 %.
- 7.
If infanticides have been included in the data, a note has been added.
- 8.
The rates have been weighted by the mean population of 2010. The unweighted mortality rates show the mean of the national rates of each sub-region, while the weighted rates show the homicide rate of the whole sub-region.
- 9.
Countries with mean annual population below 100,000 in 2000–2010 have been excluded.
- 10.
According to Turkish police statistics the general homicide rate was 7.8-fold higher than the level shown by published COD statistics in 2003–2010. If we adjust the COD statistics levels accordingly, annual female homicide mortality would have been appr. 1.5 per 100,000 women and male mortality appr. 6.5 per 100,000 men during the period.
- 11.
- 12.
The time series of Bulgaria, Latvia, Poland, Russia, and Ukraine begin in the 1960s. For these countries the comparisons have been made between the mean annual levels of the 1960s and the 2000s.
- 13.
Our data cover the years 2000–2006, data of the last years of the 2000s (when hostilities broke out again) have not yet been published.
- 14.
These are unweighted means for the whole group of Latin American countries in Table 3.
- 15.
There were several such crises in the studied group, as examples of armed conflicts we used the period of armed resistance in Estonia (1947–1949), the Algerian war in France (1954–1962), the Hungarian revolution (October–November 1956), the conflict in Northern Ireland (1968–1998), the War of Attrition (March, 1969–August, 1970) and second Intifada (2000–2005) in Israel, the first phase of the Sri Lankan civil war (1983–2001), and the Colombian crises of the post-Second World War period. As examples of political crises we used the Stalinist period (1950–1953) in Estonia, and the regime changes in Central Europe, Baltic countries, and Eastern Europe in the late-1980s and during the 1990s.
- 16.
There were, however, a few exceptions from this rule: the period of armed resistance in Estonia in the 1940s, the period of La Violencia in Colombia from the 1940s until the 1960s, and the second Intifada in Israel in the 2000s increased male and female homicide mortality more or less evenly.
- 17.
The latter was counted for the first time 2010 and it replaces previous GEM and GDI indexes.. Reproductive health covers Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) and the adolescent fertility rate (AFR). With a low MMR, it is implied that pregnant women have access to adequate health needs, therefore the MMR is a good measure of women's access to health care. A high AFR, which measures early childbearing, results in health risks for mothers and infants as well as a lack of higher education attainment. The empowerment dimension is measured by the share of national parliamentary seats held by each sex and higher education attainment levels. Access to higher education expands women’s freedom by increasing their ability to question and increases their access to information which expands their public involvement. The labor market dimension is measured by women’s participation in the workforce. This dimension accounts for paid work, unpaid work, and actively looking for work.
References
Aebi, M. F., & Linde, A. (2012). Crime trends in Western Europe according to official statistics from 1990 to 2007. In J. van Dijk, A. Tseloni, & G. Farrell (Eds.), The international crime drop: New trends in research (pp. 37–75). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., &Wacziarg, R. (2002). Fractionalization (NBER Working Paper Series 9411). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w9411
Chon, D. S. (2013). A spurious relationship of gender equality with female homicide victimization: A cross-national analysis. Crime & Delinquency. First published on 12 July 2013 as doi: 10.1177/0011128713492497.
Dunstall, G. (2004). Frontier and/or cultural fragment? Interpretations of violence in colonial New Zealand. Social History, 29(1), 59–83.
Eisner, M. (2003). Long-term historical trend in violent crime. In: Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 83–142). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eisner, M. (2008). Modernity strikes back? A historical perspective on the latest increase in interpersonal violence (1960–1990). International Journal of Conflict and Violence., 2(2), 288–316.
Ellonen, N., Kääriäinen, J., Lehti, M., & Aaltonen, M. (2014). Trends of infanticides 1960–2009: Comparisons between 28 countries. Unpublished manuscript, available from the NRILP.
Gartner, R. (1990). The victims of homicide: A temporal and cross-national comparison. American Sociological Review, 55, 92–106.
Granath, S., Hagstedt, J., Kivivuori, J., Lehti, M., Ganpat, S., Liem, M., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2011). Homicide in Finland, the Netherlands and Sweden. A First Study on the European Homicide Monitor Data. The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention Research Report 2011:15. Oikeuspoliittisen tutkimuslaitoksen tutkimuksia 259. Stockholm: Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention.
Gurr, T. R. (1981). Historical trends in violent crime: A critical review of the evidence (Crime and Justice Vol. 3). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gurr, T. R. (1989). Historical trends in violent crime: Europe and the United States. Violence in America 1: The history of crime. Newbury Park: Sage.
Höynck, T., Zähringer, U., & Behnsen, M. (2012). Neonatizid. Expertise im Rahmen des Projekts “Anonyme Geburt und Babyklappen in Deutschland—Fallzahlen, Angebote, Kontexte”. München: Deutsches Jugendinstitut.
Jason, J., Carpenter, M. M., & Tyler, C. W., Jr. (1983). Underrecording of infant homicide in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 73(2), 195–197.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2006) Governance matters V: Aggregate and individual governance indicators for 1996–2005 (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4012). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Kivivuori, J., & Lehti, M. (2011). Homicide in Finland and Sweden. In M. Tonry, & T. Lappi-Seppälä (Eds.), Crime and justice in scandinavia (Crime and Justice Vol. 40). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lappi-Seppälä, T., & Lehti, M. (2015). Cross-comparative perspectives on global homicide trends. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Why crime rates fall, and why they don’t (Crime and Justice Vol) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lehti, M. (2001). Homicide trends in Finland and Estonia in 1880–1940: Consequences of the demographic, social and political effects of industrialization. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 2/2001, 50–71.
Lehti, M. (2013). NRILP comparative homicide time series (NRILP-CHTS) (National Research Institute of Legal Policy Research Brief 32/2013). Helsinki: National Research Institute of Legal Policy. http://www.optula.om.fi/1368802881488
Lindström, D. (2008). Homicide in Scandinavia: Long-term trends and their interpretations. In S. Body-Gendrot, & P. Spierenburg (Eds.), Violence in Europe: Historical and contemporary perspectives. New York, NY: Springer.
Marshall, I. H., & Summers, D. L. (2012). Contemporary differences in rates and trends of homicide among European nations. In M. Liem & W. Pridemore (Eds.), Handbook of European homicide research (pp. 39–69). New York: Springer.
McClintock, F. H. (1963). Crimes of violence: An enquiry by the Cambridge institute of criminology into crimes of violence against the person in London (Cambridge Studies in Criminology XVIII). London: Cambridge University Press.
Meslé, F., Shkolnikov, V. M., Hertrich, V., & Vallin, J. (1996). Tendances récentes de la mortalité par cause en Russie 1965–1994. Paris: INED.
Meslé, F., & Vallin, J. (2012). Mortality and causes of death in 20th century Ukraine. Paris: INED.
Ouimet, M. (2012). A world of homicides: The effect of economic development, income inequality, and excess infant mortality on the homicide rate for 165 countries in 2010. Homicide Studies: An Interdisciplinary and International Journal, 16(3), 238–258.
Sharpe, J. A. (1996). Crime in England: Long-term trends and the problem of modernization. In E. A. Johnson, & E. H. Monkkonen (Eds.), The civilization of crime: Violence in town and country since the middle ages. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Smit, P. R., de Jong, R. R., & Bijleveld, C. C. J. H. (2012). Homicide data in Europe: Definitions, sources, and statistics. In M. C. A. Liem, & W. A. Pridemore (Eds.), Handbook of European homicide research: Patterns, explanations, and country studies (pp. 5–24). New York: Springer.
Spierenburg, P. (2012). Long-term historical trends of homicide in Europe. In M. C. A. Liem, & W. A. Pridemore (Eds.), Handbook of European homicide research: Patterns, explanations, and country studies (pp. 25–38). New York: Springer.
Stamatel, J. P. (2014). Explaining variations in female homicide victimization rates across Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 11(5), 578–600.
Stöckl, H., Devries, K., Rotstein, A., Abrahams, N., Campbell, J., Watts, C., & Moreno, C. G. (2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review. Lancet, 382, 859–865.
Trent C. L. S., & Pridemore, A. (2012). A Review of the cross-national empirical literature on social structure and homicide. In M. C. A. Liem, & W. A. Pridemore (Eds.), Handbook of European homicide research: Patterns, explanations, and country studies (pp. 111–136). New York: Springer.
Tursz, A., & Cook, J. M. (2011). A population-based survey of neonaticides using judicial data. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 96(4), F259–F263.
UNODC. (2011). Global study on homicide: Trends, contexts, data. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
UNODC. (2013). Global study on homicide: Trends, contexts, data. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
Verkko, V. (1931a). Henki- ja pahoinpitelyrikollisuuden kehityssuunnan ja tason määräytymisestä I. Tilastollis metodologinen tutkimus. Helsinki: Valtioneuvoston Kirjapaino.
Verkko, V. (1931b). Henki- ja pahoinpitelyrikollisuuden kehityssuunnan ja tason määräytymisestä II. Tilastollis metodologinen tutkimus. Helsinki: Valtioneuvoston Kirjapaino.
Verkko, V. (1951). Homicides and suicides in Finland and their dependence on national character (Scandinavian studies in sociology Vol. 3). Köbenhavn: G. E. C. Gads Forlag.
von Hofer, H. (2008). Brott och Straff i Sverige: Historisk kriminalstatistik 1750–2005: Diagram, tabeller och kommentarer. Stockholm: Kriminologiska Institutionen Stockholms Universitet.
von Hofer, H., & Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2014). The development of crime in light of finnish and Swedish criminal justice statistics, ca. 1750–2010. European Journal of Criminology, 11(2), 169–194.
Wikström, P.-O. (1992). Context-specific trends in criminal homicide in Stockholm 1951–1987. Studies on Crime & Crime Prevention, 1/1992, 88–105.
Yarwood, D. J. (2004). Child homicide: Review of statistics and studies. Dewar Research. Available at: www.dewar4research.org (retrieved in 31.10.2013).
Ylikangas, H. (1998). The knife fighters: Violent crime in Southern Ostrobothnia 1790–1825. (Suomen tiedeakatemian toimituksia, Humaniora 293). Helsinki: Suomen tiedeakatemia.
Zahn, M. A. (1989). Homicide in the twentieth century: Trends, types, and causes. In T. R. Gurr (Ed.), Violence in America 1: The history of crime (pp. 216–234). Newbury Park: Sage.
Zahn, M. A., & McCall, P. L. (1999). Homicide in the 20th-century United States: Trends and patterns. In M. D. Smith, & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Studying and preventing homicide: Issues and challenges. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Table 9 sources
-
Males, 15–29 % (2005): UN DESA World Population Database (http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/unpp/p2k0data.asp)
-
Urban population (% of total WB 2007): The World Bank Database (http://data.worldbank.org/indicator)
-
Ethnic fractionalization (Alesina 2002): Alesina et al. (2002).
-
GDP per capital PPP 2006 World Bank (2007): The World Bank Database (http://data.worldbank.org/indicator)
-
HDI 2012 (UN): UNDP Human Development Reports Database (http://hdr.undp.org/en/data)
-
Public Social Exp. 2002–2007, % of GDP (IMF): http://www.ilo.org/dyn/sesame/ifpses.socialdbexp
-
GINI Coefficient (UNDP 2004): UNDP Human Development Reports Database (http://hdr.undp.org/en/data)
-
Education (LPI): Legatum Institute Prosperity Index (http://www.prosperity.com)
-
Health (LPI): Legatum Institute Prosperity Index (http://www.prosperity.com)
-
Gender-related development index (GDI) http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-development-index-gdi
-
Gender equality index (GII) http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index-gii
Total homicide rates and male and female mean homicide mortality rates by continents and regions (victims per 100,000 total population, men and women)
Continent | Country | Homicide | Males | Females | Female/Male | Years |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sub-region | 2004–2012 | Ratio | Female/Male | |||
Europe | ||||||
Scandinavia | Denmark | 0.8 | 1.03 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 2009–2011 |
Finland | 2.1 | 2.87 | 1.02 | 0.36 | 2009–2011 | |
Iceland | 0.7 | 0.91 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 2005–2009 | |
Norway | 0.9 | 0.76 | 0.52 | 0.68 | 2009–2010, 2012 | |
Sweden | 0.9 | 1.08 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 2010–2012 | |
All | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.40 | ||
France/Benelux | Belgium | 1.4 | 1.62 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 2007–2009 |
France | 0.7 | 0.88 | 0.48 | 0.55 | 2007–2009 | |
Luxembourg | 1.3 | 2.11 | 0.72 | 0.34 | 2007–2011 | |
Monaco | 2.8 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.00 | 2003–2012 | |
Netherlands | 0.9 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 2010–2012 | |
All | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.58 | ||
German speaking Europe | Austria | 0.6 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 1.08 | 2010–2012 |
Germany | 0.7 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.93 | 2009–2011 | |
Liechtenstein | 2.8 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2004–2012 | |
Switzerland | 0.7 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.97 | 2008–2010 | |
All | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.57 | ||
British Isles | England and Wales | 1.3 | 0.74 | 0.38 | 0.51 | 2010–2012 |
Guernsey (UK) | 0.3 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.97 | 2003–2012 | |
Ireland | 0.8 | 1.34 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 2010–2012 | |
Isle of Man (UK) | 2.1 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 1.43 | 2003–2012 | |
Jersey (UK) | 3.5 | 0.69 | 1.62 | 2.35 | 2004–2012 | |
Northern Ireland | 1.6 | 2.53 | 0.69 | 0.27 | 2009–2011 | |
Scotland | 2.0 | 2.24 | 0.58 | 0.26 | 2010–2012 | |
All | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.56 | ||
Southwest Europe | Andorra | 1.3 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2001–2004 |
Gibraltar (UK) | 3.5 | 1.19 | 1.16 | 0.97 | 2007–2012 | |
Italy | 0.9 | 1.23 | 0.44 | 0.36 | 2008–2010 | |
Malta | 0.9 | 1.07 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 2007–2011 | |
Portugal | 1.2 | 1.47 | 0.66 | 0.45 | 2009–2011 | |
Spain | 0.9 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 2009–2011 | |
All | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.42 | ||
Southeast Europe | Albania | 3.3 | 4.05 | 1.14 | 0.28 | 2007–2009 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1.6 | |||||
Croatia | 1.5 | 1.44 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 2009–2011 | |
Cyprus | 1.4 | 1.78 | 0.71 | 0.40 | 2007–2011 | |
Greece | 1.1 | 2.01 | 0.66 | 0.33 | 2007–2009 | |
Kosovo/Kos | 1.1 | 1.99 | 0.35 | 0.18 | 2007–2011 | |
Macedonia | 2.1 | 2.36 | 0.94 | 0.40 | 2009–2011 | |
Montenegro | 2.0 | 3.45 | 1.07 | 0.31 | 2005–2009 | |
Northern Cyprus | 2.2 | 4.02 | 1.79 | 0.45 | 2001–2010 | |
Serbia | 2.2 | 2.57 | 1.13 | 0.44 | 2009–2011 | |
Slovenia | 0.9 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.88 | 2008–2010 | |
Turkey | 0.5 | 0.81 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 2006–2008 | |
All | 1.7 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.38 | ||
Baltic | Estonia | 6.6 | 7.95 | 2.16 | 0.27 | 2010–2012 |
Latvia | 8.0 | 10.03 | 3.22 | 0.32 | 2010–2012 | |
Lithuania | 6.7 | 7.63 | 2.68 | 0.35 | 2010–2012 | |
All | 2.7 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.35 | ||
Central and Eastern Europe | Bulgaria | 1.9 | 2.37 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 2009–2011 |
Czech Republic | 0.9 | 0.99 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 2009–2011 | |
Hungary | 1.8 | 1.87 | 1.20 | 0.64 | 2010–2012 | |
Poland | 1.3 | 1.48 | 0.60 | 0.41 | 2009–2011 | |
Romania | 2.4 | 3.03 | 1.47 | 0.49 | 2009–2011 | |
Slovakia | 1.4 | 1.53 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 2008–2010 | |
All | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.51 | ||
Eastern Europe (Former Soviet Region) | Armenia | 1.6 | 2.33 | 0.54 | 0.23 | 2009–2011 |
Azerbaijan | 1.9 | 3.95 | 0.84 | 0.21 | 2002–2004 | |
Belarus | 7.4 | 9.54 | 3.91 | 0.41 | 2007–2009 | |
Georgia | 1.2 | 1.18 | 0.27 | 0.23 | 2007, 2009, 2010 | |
Moldova | 7.0 | 8.99 | 3.84 | 0.43 | 2009–2011 | |
Russian Federation | 19.2 | 24.28 | 6.86 | 0.28 | 2008–2010 | |
Ukraine | 7.9 | 9.24 | 3.45 | 0.37 | 2009–2011 | |
All | 6.6 | 8.5 | 2.8 | 0.33 | ||
Africa | ||||||
North Africa | Algeria | 8.4 | ||||
Egypt | 0.8 | |||||
Libya | 2.9 | |||||
Morocco | 1.5 | |||||
Sudan | 26.4 | |||||
Tunisia | 1.4 | |||||
All | 6.9 | |||||
Central Africa | Angola | 27.5 | ||||
Cameroon | 17.9 | |||||
Central African Republic | 29.2 | |||||
Chad | 17.4 | |||||
Congo (Dem Repub of) | 24.8 | |||||
Gabon | 15.5 | |||||
Sao Tome e Principe | 3.7 | |||||
All | 19.4 | |||||
East Africa | Burundi | 28.6 | ||||
Comoros | 10.8 | |||||
Djibouti | 3.5 | |||||
Eritrea | 16.9 | |||||
Ethiopia | 22.4 | |||||
Kenya | 4.0 | |||||
Madagascar | 9.9 | |||||
Malawi | 27.0 | |||||
Mauritius | 3.7 | 4.94 | 1.85 | 0.37 | 2009–2011 | |
Mayotte | 1.9 | |||||
Mozambique | 14.5 | |||||
Rodriques | 4.0 | 3.35 | 2.79 | 0.83 | 2001–2011 | |
Reunion | 2.0 | 2.35 | 1.27 | 0.54 | 2001–2009 | |
Rwanda | 21.9 | |||||
Seychelles | 6.0 | 9.91 | 2.64 | 0.27 | 2001–2009 | |
Tanzania | 7.8 | |||||
Uganda | 7.3 | |||||
All | 11.3 | 5.1 | 2.1 | 0.42 | ||
West Africa | Benin | 14.0 | ||||
Burkina Faso | 18.1 | |||||
Cape Verde | 11.9 | |||||
Cote D'Ivoire | 51.3 | |||||
Equatorial Guinea | 22.4 | |||||
Gambia | 12.2 | |||||
Ghana | 13.7 | |||||
Guinea Bissau | 18.3 | |||||
Liberia | 13.5 | |||||
Mali | 13.0 | |||||
Mauritania | 15.0 | |||||
Niger | 12.0 | |||||
Nigeria | 15.0 | |||||
Republic of Guinea | 19.9 | |||||
Saint Helene | 17.9 | |||||
Senegal | 11.5 | |||||
Sierra Leone | 24.5 | |||||
Togo | 12.3 | |||||
South Africa | Botswana | 11.7 | ||||
Lesotho | 18.1 | |||||
Namibia | 20.1 | |||||
South Africa | 36.7 | 18.66 | 2.72 | 0.15 | 2004–2009 | |
Swaziland | 31.1 | |||||
Zambia | 30.5 | |||||
Zimbabwe | 23.6 | |||||
All | 24.5 | 18.7 | 2.7 | 0.15 | ||
Americas | ||||||
North America | Bermuda (UK) | 2.3 | 1.52 | 0.61 | 0.40 | 1999–2008 |
Canada | 1.6 | 2.51 | 0.78 | 0.31 | 2007–2009 | |
Greenland | 14.7 | |||||
USA | 5.7 | 8.80 | 2.32 | 0.26 | 2008–2010 | |
All | 6.1 | 4.3 | 1.2 | 0.29 | ||
Central America | Belize | 16.3 | 30.26 | 5.17 | 0.17 | 2005–2009 |
Costa Rica | 8.8 | 16.27 | 2.37 | 0.15 | 2010–2012 | |
El Salvador | 50.5 | 98.52 | 11.17 | 0.11 | 2007–2009 | |
Guatemala | 35.4 | 67.23 | 8.01 | 0.12 | 2007–2009 | |
Honduras | 50.1 | |||||
Mexico | 13.6 | 38.62 | 3.91 | 0.10 | 2009–2011 | |
Nicaragua | 9.1 | 15.60 | 1.70 | 0.10 | 2008–2010 | |
Panama | 15.0 | 33.25 | 3.47 | 0.10 | 2007–2009 | |
All | 24.9 | 42.8 | 5.1 | 0.12 | ||
South America | Argentina | 5.5 | 7.75 | 1.38 | 0.18 | 2007–2009 |
Bolivia | 7.2 | |||||
Brazil | 25.2 | 47.15 | 4.04 | 0.09 | 2007–2009 | |
Chile | 5.1 | 8.37 | 1.15 | 0.14 | 2007–2009 | |
Colombia | 41.5 | 97.40 | 8.30 | 0.09 | 2008–2010 | |
Ecuador | 18.8 | 30.18 | 2.75 | 0.09 | 2008–2010 | |
French Guyane | 9.1 | 17.00 | 2.00 | 0.12 | 2005–2009 | |
Guyana | 16.5 | 27.15 | 6.21 | 0.23 | 2006–2008 | |
Paraguay | 11.0 | 18.30 | 1.50 | 0.08 | 2007–2009 | |
Peru | 1.7 | 2.75 | 0.51 | 0.19 | 2005–2007 | |
Suriname | 4.3 | 6.14 | 2.17 | 0.35 | 2000–2009 | |
Uruguay | 4.7 | 7.74 | 1.97 | 0.25 | 2007–2009 | |
Venezuela | 30.9 | 60.07 | 3.44 | 0.06 | 2005–2007 | |
All | 14.0 | 27.5 | 3.0 | 0.11 | ||
Caribbean | Anguila | 18.6 | 11.97 | 1.71 | 0.14 | 2000–2009 |
Antigua and Barbuda | 4.9 | 5.43 | 1.48 | 0.27 | 2000–2009 | |
Aruba | 5.1 | 5.57 | 1.65 | 0.30 | 2000–2009 | |
Bahamas | 19.2 | 36.86 | 4.18 | 0.11 | 2005–2008 | |
Barbados | 12.5 | 18.19 | 3.88 | 0.21 | 2000–2008 | |
Cayman | 8.0 | 10.00 | 3.18 | 0.32 | 1999–2009 | |
Cuba | 5.3 | 6.99 | 2.37 | 0.34 | 2008–2010 | |
Dominica | 6.9 | 10.00 | 2.22 | 0.22 | 2001–2010 | |
Dominican Republic | 20.7 | 45.19 | 4.09 | 0.09 | 2009–2011 | |
Grenada | 1.2 | 0.57 | 0.75 | 1.32 | 2001–2010 | |
Guadeloupe | 3.4 | 5.04 | 1.33 | 0.26 | 2004–2009 | |
Haiti | 14.5 | |||||
Jamaica | 53.5 | 80.36 | 9.49 | 0.12 | 2010–2012 | |
Martinique | 3.5 | 5.04 | 1.38 | 0.27 | 2004–2009 | |
Montserrat | 21.1 | 12.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2001–2010 | |
Puerto Rico | 21.8 | 36.22 | 2.40 | 0.07 | 2005–2007 | |
St Lucia | 12.5 | 26.54 | 9.58 | 0.36 | 1998–2008 | |
St Vincent and the Grenadines | 18.4 | 26.00 | 6.11 | 0.24 | 2001–2010 | |
St. Kitts and Nevis | 16.0 | 21.25 | 0.83 | 0.04 | 1999–2008 | |
Trinidad and Tobago | 32.6 | 44.20 | 5.50 | 0.11 | 2006–2008 | |
Turks and Caicos | 9.0 | 4.29 | 1.43 | 0.33 | 2000–2009 | |
Virgin Islands (UK) | 13.3 | 5.38 | 3.08 | 0.57 | 1998–2009 | |
Virgin Islands (USA) | 28.5 | 56.11 | 5.56 | 0.10 | 1998–2007 | |
All | 15.2 | 21.5 | 3.3 | 0.15 | ||
Asia | ||||||
Central Asia (Former Soviet Region) | Kazakhstan | 12.4 | 16.26 | 4.24 | 0.26 | 2008–2010 |
Kyrgyzstan | 6.4 | 9.50 | 2.65 | 0.28 | 2008–2010 | |
Tajikistan | 2.1 | 3.62 | 1.01 | 0.28 | 2003–2005 | |
Turkmenistan | 11.8 | 9.93 | 1.97 | 0.20 | 1996–2098 | |
Uzbekistan | 2.6 | 3.61 | 1.25 | 0.35 | 2003–2005 | |
7.1 | 8.6 | 2.2 | 0.26 | |||
Middle East | Bahrain | 0.2 | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.32 | 2000–2009 |
Iran | 2.0 | |||||
Iraq | 4.4 | |||||
Israel | 2.3 | 3.21 | 0.84 | 0.26 | 2008–2010 | |
Jordan | 7.0 | 3.22 | 0.99 | 0.31 | 2008–2009 | |
Kuwait | 2.0 | 0.94 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 2009–2011 | |
Lebanon | 3.1 | |||||
Palestine | 3.6 | 5.56 | 0.30 | 0.05 | 2008–2009 | |
Qatar | 0.7 | |||||
Saudi Arabia | 1.1 | |||||
Syria | 2.5 | |||||
United Arab Emirates | 0.8 | |||||
Yemen | 2.3 | |||||
All | 2.5 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 0.18 | ||
Southcentral Asia | Afghanistan | 3.4 | ||||
Bangladesh | 2.7 | |||||
Bhutan | 1.4 | |||||
India | 2.9 | |||||
Maldives | 0.5 | 0.39 | 0.20 | 0.51 | 2001–2011 | |
Nepal | 3.0 | |||||
Pakistan | 6.6 | |||||
Sri Lanka | 6.2 | 6.08 | 1.18 | 0.19 | 2004–2006 | |
All | 3.3 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 0.21 | ||
East Asia | China | 1.4 | ||||
Hong Kong | 0.5 | 0.39 | 0.53 | 1.36 | 2009–2011 | |
Japan | 0.4 | 0.37 | 0.33 | 0.89 | 2009–2011 | |
Macau | 1.6 | 1.28 | 1.52 | 1.19 | 2003–2008 | |
Mongolia | 11.9 | 22.37 | 3.95 | 0.18 | 2006–2008 | |
North Korea | 17.1 | |||||
South Korea | 1.5 | 1.41 | 1.16 | 0.82 | 2009–2011 | |
Taiwan | 0.8 | 0.94 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 2009–2011 | |
All | 35.2 | 26.8 | 7.9 | 0.30 | ||
Southeast Asia | Brunei Darussalam | 3.6 | 3.61 | 1.66 | 0.46 | 2002–2009 |
Cambodia | 3.7 | |||||
Indonesia | 8.5 | |||||
Laos | 5.0 | |||||
Malaysia | 1.6 | 1.67 | 0.37 | 0.22 | 2006–2008 | |
Myanmar | 1.6 | |||||
Philippines | 17.5 | 25.35 | 2.33 | 0.09 | 2008 | |
Singapore | 0.4 | 0.49 | 0.18 | 0.37 | 2009–2011 | |
Thailand | 5.4 | 8.67 | 1.20 | 0.14 | 2004–2006 | |
Timor-Leste | 9.3 | |||||
Vietnam | 2.7 | |||||
All | 5.4 | 8.0 | 1.1 | 0.14 | ||
Oceania | ||||||
American Samoa | 3.4 | |||||
Australia | 0.9 | 1.24 | 0.60 | 0.48 | 2009–2011 | |
Cook Islands | 5.1 | |||||
Fiji | 3.1 | 2.26 | 3.58 | 1.58 | 2006–2008 | |
French Polynesia | 2.1 | 0.98 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 1999–2005 | |
Guam | 3.0 | |||||
Kiribati | 6.9 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1992–2001 | |
Marshall Islands | 1.8 | |||||
Micronesia | 0.9 | |||||
Nauru | 9.9 | |||||
New Caledonia | 2.4 | 8.53 | 1.90 | 0.22 | 1999–2002 | |
New Zealand | 1.5 | 1.87 | 1.13 | 0.60 | 2007–2009 | |
Norfolk Island | 55.6 | 10.53 | 10.53 | 1.00 | 2003–2012 | |
Palau | 0.9 | |||||
Papua New Guinea | 14.2 | |||||
Samoa | 2.1 | |||||
Solomon Islands | 1.3 | |||||
Tonga | 1.0 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2000–2007 | |
Tuvalu | 9.0 | |||||
Vanuatu | 1.0 | |||||
All | 6.3 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 0.65 | ||
Total | 6.3 | 10.76 | 1.97 | 0.18 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lappi-Seppälä, T., Lehti, M. (2016). Global Homicide Mortality Trends by Gender 1950–2010. In: Kury, H., Redo, S., Shea, E. (eds) Women and Children as Victims and Offenders: Background, Prevention, Reintegration. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08398-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08398-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08397-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08398-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)