Skip to main content

Geodesign to Support Multi-level Safety Policy for Flood Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geodesign by Integrating Design and Geospatial Sciences

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEODES,volume 111))

Abstract

Sound flood management strategies are of utmost importance in low-lying areas like The Netherlands. Flood perceptions have changed over time, from flood protection and economically-oriented strategies, to more environmentally focused strategies such as the ‘Room for River’ program. Recently, a multi-level safety policy for flood management has gained more attention, which aims to take both preventive and effect-restrictive measurements. Preventive measures (level 1) are for example dike strengthening. Effect-restrictive measurements concern spatial planning (level 2), for example by compartmenting polders, and crisis management (level 3). The waterboard of the province of Noord-Holland (The Netherlands) intends to implement the Eagle Crisis Management System (CMS). This system uses a net-centric approach, which facilitates to share actual geographical and textual data that is part of the Common Operational Picture among the different organizations that are involved during a flood crisis. The Eagle system will be integrated with the 3Di flood simulation model. This allows to calculated flood areas and inundation depths during a flood, which can be directly visualized and shared in Eagle CMS, and used for example to define or adapt evacuation routes.

Developing a multi-level water safety policy can be greatly supported by using the geodesign framework. Multiple steps are dealt with iteratively, including data collection, setting options and boundary conditions, defining different scenarios and estimating impacts of those scenarios. Furthermore, the geodesign framework facilitates collaboration between stakeholders which are involved in all phases of the design process. Finally, a well-considered and supported decision regarding the water system can be made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/deltaprogramma.

  2. 2.

    (In Dutch) Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen: https://www.kadaster.nl/bag.

  3. 3.

    (In Dutch) https://www.kadaster.nl/web/artikel/productartikel/TOP10NL.htm.

  4. 4.

    www.dinoloket.nl.

  5. 5.

    (In Dutch) www.ahn.nl.

  6. 6.

    (In Dutch) www.risikokaart.nl.

  7. 7.

    www.cbs.nl.

  8. 8.

    http://www.geodan.nl/producten/eagle-cms/#t_introductie_tab.

  9. 9.

    http://www.enwinfo.nl/asp/content.asp?niveau=2&DocumentID=4.

  10. 10.

    www.helpdeskwater.nl/publish/pages/4942/trob-h06.pdf.‎

  11. 11.

    http://www.dijkverbetering.waterschaprivierenland.nl/dijkverbetering/waarom.

  12. 12.

    www.3di.nu.

References

  • Bharosa, N, van Zanten, B., Janssen, M., & Groenleer, N. (2009). Transforming crisis management: Field studies on the efforts to migrate from system-centric to network-centric operations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5693, 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPDD. (2013). Integrated planning and design in the Delta. Nieuwe Perspectieven voor Een Verstedelijkte Delta, Naar Een Methode van Planvorming en Ontwerp. Delft: Urban Regions in the Delta program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolen, B., Zethof, M., & Maaskant, B. (2012). Toepassing basisvisie afwegingskader meerlaagse veiligheid; een methode om mee te werken in de praktijk. STOWA Rapport, 66, 2012–2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolen, B., & Helsloot, I. (2012). Time needed to evacuate the Netherlands in the event of large-scale flooding: Strategies and consequences. Disasters, 36, 700–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leskens, A., Boomgaard, M., & van Zuijlen, C. (2013). Meerlaagse veiligheid: hoe maken we dat concreet? Den Haag: Vakblad H2O, Vakartikelen.

    Google Scholar 

  • MVW. (2007). Voorschrift Toetsen op Veiligheid Primaire Waterkeringen. Den Haag: Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuvel, J. M., Scholten, H. J., & van den Brink, A. (2012). From spatial data to synchronised actions: The network-centric organisation of spatial decision support for risk and emergency management. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 5, 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santen van, W., Jonker, C., & Wijngaards, N. (2009). Crisis decision making through a shared integrative negotiation mental model. International Journal of Emergency Management, 6, 342–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, H. J., Fruijtier, S., Dilo, A., & van Borkulo, E. (2008). Spatial data infrastructures for emergency response in the Netherlands. In: S. Nayak & S. Zlatanova (Eds.), Remote sensing and GIS technologies for monitoring en prediction of disasters. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz, C. (2012). A framework for geodesign. Changing geography by design. Redlands: Esri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • STOWA. (2007). Leidraad toetsen op veiligheid regionale waterkeringen. Utrecht: STOWA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syvitski, J. P. M., Kettner, A. J., Overeem, I., Hutton, E. W. H., Hannon, M. T., Brakenridge, G. R., Day, J., Vörösmarty, C., Saito, Y., Giosan, L., & Nicholls, R. J. (2009). Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nature Geoscience, 2, 681–686. doi:10.1038/ngeo629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vriend de, H., & Koningsveld van, M. (2012). Building with nature. Thinking, acting and interacting differently. Dordrecht: EcoShape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, I. P., Rajabifard, A., & Feeney, M. E. F (Eds.). (2004). Developing spatial data infrastructures: From concept to reality. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wit de, S., Jongejan, R., van der Most, H. (2010). Niet bij preventie alleen. Simulatie en analyse van een debat tussen voor- en tegenstanders van meerlaagsveiligheid. In: H. van der Most, S. de Wit, B. Broekhand, & W. Roos (Eds.). Kijk op waterveiligheid. Delft: Uitgeverij Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanneke van Asselen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Asselen, S., Scholten, H., Koshiek, L. (2014). Geodesign to Support Multi-level Safety Policy for Flood Management. In: Lee, D., Dias, E., Scholten, H. (eds) Geodesign by Integrating Design and Geospatial Sciences. GeoJournal Library(), vol 111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08299-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics