Abstract
Sound flood management strategies are of utmost importance in low-lying areas like The Netherlands. Flood perceptions have changed over time, from flood protection and economically-oriented strategies, to more environmentally focused strategies such as the ‘Room for River’ program. Recently, a multi-level safety policy for flood management has gained more attention, which aims to take both preventive and effect-restrictive measurements. Preventive measures (level 1) are for example dike strengthening. Effect-restrictive measurements concern spatial planning (level 2), for example by compartmenting polders, and crisis management (level 3). The waterboard of the province of Noord-Holland (The Netherlands) intends to implement the Eagle Crisis Management System (CMS). This system uses a net-centric approach, which facilitates to share actual geographical and textual data that is part of the Common Operational Picture among the different organizations that are involved during a flood crisis. The Eagle system will be integrated with the 3Di flood simulation model. This allows to calculated flood areas and inundation depths during a flood, which can be directly visualized and shared in Eagle CMS, and used for example to define or adapt evacuation routes.
Developing a multi-level water safety policy can be greatly supported by using the geodesign framework. Multiple steps are dealt with iteratively, including data collection, setting options and boundary conditions, defining different scenarios and estimating impacts of those scenarios. Furthermore, the geodesign framework facilitates collaboration between stakeholders which are involved in all phases of the design process. Finally, a well-considered and supported decision regarding the water system can be made.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
(In Dutch) Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen: https://www.kadaster.nl/bag.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
(In Dutch) www.ahn.nl.
- 6.
(In Dutch) www.risikokaart.nl.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
References
Bharosa, N, van Zanten, B., Janssen, M., & Groenleer, N. (2009). Transforming crisis management: Field studies on the efforts to migrate from system-centric to network-centric operations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5693, 65–75.
IPDD. (2013). Integrated planning and design in the Delta. Nieuwe Perspectieven voor Een Verstedelijkte Delta, Naar Een Methode van Planvorming en Ontwerp. Delft: Urban Regions in the Delta program.
Kolen, B., Zethof, M., & Maaskant, B. (2012). Toepassing basisvisie afwegingskader meerlaagse veiligheid; een methode om mee te werken in de praktijk. STOWA Rapport, 66, 2012–2023.
Kolen, B., & Helsloot, I. (2012). Time needed to evacuate the Netherlands in the event of large-scale flooding: Strategies and consequences. Disasters, 36, 700–722.
Leskens, A., Boomgaard, M., & van Zuijlen, C. (2013). Meerlaagse veiligheid: hoe maken we dat concreet? Den Haag: Vakblad H2O, Vakartikelen.
MVW. (2007). Voorschrift Toetsen op Veiligheid Primaire Waterkeringen. Den Haag: Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat.
Neuvel, J. M., Scholten, H. J., & van den Brink, A. (2012). From spatial data to synchronised actions: The network-centric organisation of spatial decision support for risk and emergency management. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 5, 51–72.
Santen van, W., Jonker, C., & Wijngaards, N. (2009). Crisis decision making through a shared integrative negotiation mental model. International Journal of Emergency Management, 6, 342–355.
Scholten, H. J., Fruijtier, S., Dilo, A., & van Borkulo, E. (2008). Spatial data infrastructures for emergency response in the Netherlands. In: S. Nayak & S. Zlatanova (Eds.), Remote sensing and GIS technologies for monitoring en prediction of disasters. Berlin: Springer.
Steinitz, C. (2012). A framework for geodesign. Changing geography by design. Redlands: Esri Press.
STOWA. (2007). Leidraad toetsen op veiligheid regionale waterkeringen. Utrecht: STOWA.
Syvitski, J. P. M., Kettner, A. J., Overeem, I., Hutton, E. W. H., Hannon, M. T., Brakenridge, G. R., Day, J., Vörösmarty, C., Saito, Y., Giosan, L., & Nicholls, R. J. (2009). Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nature Geoscience, 2, 681–686. doi:10.1038/ngeo629.
Vriend de, H., & Koningsveld van, M. (2012). Building with nature. Thinking, acting and interacting differently. Dordrecht: EcoShape.
Williamson, I. P., Rajabifard, A., & Feeney, M. E. F (Eds.). (2004). Developing spatial data infrastructures: From concept to reality. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Wit de, S., Jongejan, R., van der Most, H. (2010). Niet bij preventie alleen. Simulatie en analyse van een debat tussen voor- en tegenstanders van meerlaagsveiligheid. In: H. van der Most, S. de Wit, B. Broekhand, & W. Roos (Eds.). Kijk op waterveiligheid. Delft: Uitgeverij Eburon.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Asselen, S., Scholten, H., Koshiek, L. (2014). Geodesign to Support Multi-level Safety Policy for Flood Management. In: Lee, D., Dias, E., Scholten, H. (eds) Geodesign by Integrating Design and Geospatial Sciences. GeoJournal Library(), vol 111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08299-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08299-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08298-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08299-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)