Skip to main content

Towards Geodesign: Building New Education Programs and Audiences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geodesign by Integrating Design and Geospatial Sciences

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEODES,volume 111))

Abstract

This chapter paints geodesign as an interdisciplinary field with five distinguishing characteristics: a focus on spatial thinking, geospatial technologies, the future, design as a force for good in the world, and multi-disciplinary collaboration. Several examples are introduced to show how the geodesign concept is not new and to highlight some of the challenges that derailed early “geodesign” projects. The important role of the Web as a ubiquitous analysis and communication platform and why this may be an ideal time to accomplish meaningful and lasting change is then explored with the help of three recent geodesign initiatives. The chapter concludes by examining the ways in which the aforementioned characteristics and examples might be used to help shape geodesign education programs and to highlight some of the challenges universities are likely to face as they work to create and sustain such programs in an environment in which disciplinary silos are still the norm and they are continually challenged to do more with less.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beck, M. W., FerdanÌa, Z., Kachmar, J., et al. (2009). Best practices for marine spatial planning. Arlington: The Nature Conservancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangermond, J. (2012). Foreword. In C. Steinitz (Ed.), A framework for geodesign: Changing geography by design (p. vii). Redlands: Esri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiBiase, D. W., DeMers, M., Johnson, A., et al. (2006). Geographic information science and technology body of knowledge. Washington, DC : University Consortium for Geographic Information Science and Association of American Geographers.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiBiase, D. W., DeMers, M., Johnson, A., et al. (2007). Introducing the first edition of the GIS & T Body of Knowledge. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 34, 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiBiase, D. W., Corbin, T., Fox, T., et al. (2010). The new geospatial technology competency model: Bringing workforce needs into focus. URISA Journal, 22(2), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faiz, S., & Krichen, S. (2013). Geographical information systems and spatial optimization. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T. (2012). Place-based knowledge in the digital age. ArcNews, 34(3), 1, 4–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaemi, P., Swift, J. N., Sister, C. E., et al. (2009). Design and implementation of a web-based platform to support interactive environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33, 482–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, A., & Rushton, G. (Eds.). (1987). Spatial analysis and location–allocation models. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, M., McCreary, S., Miller-Henson, M., et al. (2010). Science-based and stakeholder-driven marine protected area network planning: A successful case study from north-central California. Ocean and Coastal Management, 53(2), 52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2010). Towards Geodesign: Repurposing cartography and GIS. Cartographic Perspectives, 66, 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hise, G., & Deverell, W. (2000). Eden by design: The 1930 Olmsted–Bartholomew plan for the Los Angeles region. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, J. (Ed.). (2010). Insurgent public space: Guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, P., & Nyerges, T. L. (2001). Geographic information systems for group decision making: Towards a participatory geographic information science. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElvaney, S. (Ed.). (2012). Geodesign: Case studies in regional and urban planning. Redlands: Esri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, I. L. (1969). Design with nature. Garden City: Natural History Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield, M. S., McClintock, W., Burt, C., et al. (2013). MarineMap: A web-based platform for collaborative marine protected area planning. Ocean and Coastal Management, 74(2), 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, B. J., Moyer, D. D., Ventura, S. J., et al. (2011). Citizen planners: Shaping communities with spatial tools. Redlands: Esri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinton, D. S. (2012). Spatial thinking. In J. Stoltman (Ed.), 21st Century Geography: A ReferenceHandbook (p. 733–744). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinton, D. S., & Lund, J. J. (Eds.). (2007). Understanding place: GIS and mapping across the curriculum. Redlands: Esri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sister, C. E., Wolch, J., & Wilson, J. P. (2010). Got green? Addressing environmental injustice in park provision. GeoJournal, 75, 229–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz, C. (2012). A framework for GeoDesign: Changing geography by design. Redlands: Esri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Anselin, L., Bhaduri, B. et al (2013) CyberGIS software: A synthetic review and integration roadmap. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban places. New York: Project for Public Space.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. P., & Goodchild, M. F. (2012). Rethinking spatial sciences education programs. In T. Jekel, A. Car, J. Strobl, & G. Griesebner (Eds.), Geoinfomatics forum 2012: Geovisualization, society and learning conference proceedings (pp. 242–245) Berlin: Wichmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J., Longcore, T., & Wilson, J. P. (2012). Unpaving paradise: The green visions plan for southern California. In D. Sloane (Ed.), Planning Los Angeles (p. 230–239) Los Angeles: APA Planners Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwatch Institute. (2013). State of the World 2013: Is sustainability still possible? Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, K., & Padua, M. G. (Eds.). (2006). The art of survival: Recovering landscape architecture. Mulgrave: Images Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. Wilson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, J. (2014). Towards Geodesign: Building New Education Programs and Audiences. In: Lee, D., Dias, E., Scholten, H. (eds) Geodesign by Integrating Design and Geospatial Sciences. GeoJournal Library(), vol 111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08299-8_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics