Skip to main content

Interactive Spatial Decision Support for Agroforestry Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1746 Accesses

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEODES,volume 111))

Abstract

Forest managers, stakeholders and investors want to be able to evaluate economic, social and environmental information in order to improve the outcomes of their decisions and enhance sustainable forest management. We propose a spatial information system that provides: (1) an approach to identifying the most beneficial locations for agroforestry projects based on the biophysical properties and evaluate its economic, social and environmental impact; (2) a simulation environment that enables evaluation via a simple dashboard and with the opportunity to perform straight forward sensitivity analysis for key parameters; (3) a tool to inform prospective investors of the potential and opportunities for integrated forest management; (4) a 3D interactive geographic visualization of the economic, social and environmental outcomes to facilitate direct understanding, also by non-experts. The presented tool intends to inform investors and improve forestry management decision-making, integrating the value of environmental services and collaborative decision making of multiple decision makers and stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to company confidentiality the data presented is fictional.

References

  • Chertov, O., Komarov, A., Mikhailov, A., Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., & Gatalsky, P. (2005). Geovisualization of forest simulation modelling results: A case study of carbon sequestration and biodiversity. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 49(1), 175–191. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2005.02.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, E. S., Linde, M., Rafiee, A., Koomen, E., & Scholten, H. J. (2013). Beauty and brains: Integrating easy spatial design and advanced urban sustainability models. Chapter 27. In: Geertman, S., Toppen, F., & Stillwell, J. C. H. (Eds.), Planning support systems for sustainable urban development (pp. 469–484). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ervin, S. (2011). A system for geodesign. In E. Buhmann, S. Ervin, D. Tomlin, & S. Pietsch (Eds.), Teaching landscape architecture—Prelimenary proceedings (pp. 145–154), Bernburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2005). Global forest resources assessment 2005. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2010). Global forest resources assessment 2010. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1757e/i1757e.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2014.

  • FAO. (2013). Advancing agroforestry on the policy agenda: a guide for decision-makers. http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/i3182e/i3182e00.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2014.

  • Gamfeldt, L., Snäll, T., Bagchi, R., Jonsson, M., Gustafsson, L., Kjellander, P., & Bengtsson, J. (2013). Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nature Communications, 4, 1340. doi:10.1038/ncomms2328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, E. J., Shifley, S. R., Mladenoff, D. J., Nimerfro, K. K., He, H. S. (2000). Spatial simulation of forest succession and harvesting using LANDIS. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30:32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, H. S., & Mladenoff, D. J. (1999). Spatially explicit and stochastic simulation of forest landscape fire disturbance and succession. Ecology, 80, 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinssen, P. J. W., & Rukmantara (1996). The cost comparison model: A tool for financial budgeting of reforestation projects. IBN Research Report, 96(2), 57. Wageningen: Instituut voor Bos en Natuuronderzoek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josef et al. (2009). Investing in a more sustainable Indonesia: Country environmental analysis. CEA series, East Asia and Pacific region. Washington, DC: World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartodihardjo, H., & Supriono, A., (2000). Dampak Pembangunan Sektoral terhadap Konversi dan Degradasi Hutan Alam: Kasus Pembangunan HTI dan Perkebunan di Indonesia. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosonen, M., Otsamo, A., & Kuusipalo, J. (1997). Financial, economic and environmental profitability of reforestation of Imperata grasslands in Indonesia. Forest Ecology and Management, 99(1–2), 247–259. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00210-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogea, J., Seibert, B., & Smits, W. (1991). Multipurpose palms: the sugar palm (Arenga pinnata (Wurmb) Merr.). Agroforestry Systems, 13(2), 111–129. Kluwer. doi:10.1007/BF00140236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönkkönen, M., Juutinen, A., Mazziotta, A., Miettinen, K., Podkopaev, D., Reunanen, P., & Tikkanen, O. -P. (2014). Spatially dynamic forest management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Journal of Environmental Management, 134, 80–89. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paletto, A., De Meo, I., Di Salvatore, U., & Ferretti, F. (2013). Stakeholders’ perceptions on sustainable forest management. Socio-economic analyses of sustainable forest management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. D., Brash, T. E., Yasman, I., Subagyo, P., & van Gardingen, P. R. (2003). An individual-based spatially explicit tree growth model for forests in East Kalimantan (Indonesian Borneo). Ecological Modelling, 159(1), 1–26. doi:10.1016/S0304–3800(02)00126–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, K. M. (2005). Integrated decision support for sustainable forest management in the United States: Fact or fiction? Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 49(1), 6–23. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2005.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, N. (1998). Farm and Forest: Which Way to Sustainability. American Farmland Trust Center for Agriculture in the Environment. DeKalb, Illinois. Working Paper CAE/WP98-7. http://aftresearch.org/research/resource/publications/wp/wp98-7.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2014.

  • Schoeneberger, M., & Ruark, G. (2003). Agroforestry—Helping to achieve sustainable forest management. UNFF intersessional experts meeting on the role of planted forests in sustainable forest management, 24–30 March 2003, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segura, M., Ray, D., & Maroto, C. (2014). Decision support systems for forest management: A comparative analysis and assessment. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 101, 55–67. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2013.12.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smits, W. (2010). Ethanol production unit and method for the production of ethanol, U.S. Patent No. 20100267101 A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz, C. (2012). A framework for geodesign: changing geography by design. Redlands: ESRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, J. W., (2001). Kentucky Forest Practice Guidelines for Water Quality Management. Cooperative Extension Service, College of Agriculture, University of Kentucky UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varma, V. K., Ferguson, I., & Wild, I. (2000). Decision support system for the sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 128(1–2), 49–55. doi:10.1016/S0378–1127(99)00271–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Hilst, F., Dornburg, V., Sanders, J. P. M., Elbersen, B., Graves, A., Turkenburg, W. C., Faaij, A. P. C. (2010). Potential, spatial distribution and economic performance of regional biomass chains: The North of the Netherlands as example. Agricultural Systems, 103(7), 403–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Staaij, J., van den Bos, A., Hamelinck, C., Martini, E., Roshetko, J., & Walden, D. (2011). Sugar palm ethanol: analysis of economic feasibility and sustainability. Working Papers b17084, World Agroforestry Centre, Library Department. http://www.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/publications/PDFs/RP17084.PDF. Accessed 10 Feb 2014.

  • Vierikko, K., Vehkamäki, S., Niemelä, J., Pellikka, J., & Lindén, H. (2008). Meeting the ecological, social and economic needs of sustainable forest management at a regional scale. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23(5), 431–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Chen, J., Ju, W., & Li, M. (2010). IA-SDSS: A GIS-based land use decision support system with consideration of carbon sequestration. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(4), 539–553. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.09.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaichi, Z., & Chokkalingam, U. (2006). Stakeholder perspectives on constraints and lessons learned from Guangdong Province. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Dias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Freitas, A., Dias, E., Diogo, V., Smits, W. (2014). Interactive Spatial Decision Support for Agroforestry Management. In: Lee, D., Dias, E., Scholten, H. (eds) Geodesign by Integrating Design and Geospatial Sciences. GeoJournal Library(), vol 111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08299-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics