Skip to main content

Small Bowel Perforations: Imaging Findings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Imaging of Alimentary Tract Perforation

Abstract

Perforations of the small bowel could represent a critical challenge in diagnosis, either in emergency or elective conditions. Small bowel perforations could have different causes, such as blunt or penetrating trauma, iatrogenic injuries, mechanical obstruction, inflammatory complications, tumors, and postoperative anastomotic leaks. Imaging methods are indicated for an effective diagnosis. Conventional radiograph could attest the presence of free peritoneal air, whereas sonographic examination could reveal the evidence of free peritoneal fluid. CT examination is usually required in patients with acute abdominal conditions, and the use of intravenous contrast medium is indicated especially when clinical suspicion is not well defined and to allow a correct complete diagnosis. MDCT as a cross-sectional imaging method could be considered a good tool to perform a correct diagnosis in visualizing the amount, site, and distribution of the free peritoneal air, as well as the feature of the bowel wall, the bowel distension or collapse, and the presence of bowel wall discontinuity. Additional abdominal findings could also be of help in making suggestive diagnosis of small bowel perforation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zissin R, Osadchy A, Gayer G (2009) Abdominal CT findings in small bowel perforation. Br J Radiol 82(974):162–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Macari M, Balthazar EJ (2001) Review: computed tomography of bowel wall thickening: significance and pitfalls of interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:1105–1116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hines J, Rosenblat J, Duncan DR et al (2013) Perforation of the mesenteric small bowel: etiologies and CT findings. Emerg Radiol 20(2):155–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. LeBedis CA, Anderson SW, Soto JA (2012) CT imaging of blunt traumatic bowel and mesenteric injuries. Radiol Clin North Am 50(1):123–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho CK, Baker SR (2005) Manifestations of intraperitoneal air. In: Meyers MA (ed) Dynamic radiology of the abdomen: normal and pathologic anatomy. Springer, New York, pp 309–331

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim HC, Yang DM, Kim SW et al (2014) Gastrointestinal tract perforation: evaluation of MDCT according to perforation site and elapsed time. Eur Radiol 24:1386–1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Broder JF, Amedani AG, Liu SW et al (2013) Emergency department contrast practices for abdominal/pelvic computed tomography – a national survey and comparison with the American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria. J Emerg Med 44(2):423–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hainaux B, Agneessens E, Bertinotti R et al (2006) Accuracy of MDCT in predicting site of gastrointestinal tract perforation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1179–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh JP, Steward MJ, Booth TC et al (2010) Evolution of imaging for abdominal perforation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92(3):182–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuzmich S, Burke CJ, Harvey CJ et al (2013) Sonography of small bowel perforations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:W283–W291. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghahremani GG (1993) Radiologic evaluation of suspected gastrointestinal perforations. Radiol Clin North Am 31(6):1219–1234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grassi R, Pinto A, Rossi G et al (1998) Conventional plain film radiology, ultrasonography and CT in jejuno-ileal perforations. Acta Radiol 39(1):52–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Coulier B, Tancredi MH, Ramboux A (2004) Spiral CT and multidetector-row CT diagnosis of perforation of the small intestine caused by ingested foreign bodies. Eur Radiol 14(10):1918–1925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ho AC, Horton KM, Fishman EK (2000) Perforation of the small bowel as a complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: CT findings. Clin Imaging 24(4):204–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maniatis V, Chryssikopoulos H, Roussakis A et al (2000) Perforation of the alimentary tract: evaluation with computed tomography. Abdom Imaging 25(4):373–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaidya R, Habermann TM, Donohue JH et al (2013) Bowel perforation in intestinal lymphoma: incidence and clinical features. Ann Oncol 24(9):2439–2443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu YI, Jha P, Zhen J et al (2012) Abdominal complications of chemotherapy: findings at computed tomography. Clin Imaging 36:54–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Badgwell BD, Camp ER, Feig B et al (2008) Management of bevacizumab associated bowel perforation: a case series and review of the literature. Ann Oncol 19:577–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Benjamin RS, Blanke CD, Blay JY et al (2006) Management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the imatinib era: selected case studies. Oncologist 11:9–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghekiere O, Lesnik A, Millet I et al (2007) Direct visualization of perforation sites in patients with a non-traumatic free pneumoperitoneum: added diagnostic value of thin transverse slices and coronal and sagittal reformations for multi-detector CT. Eur Radiol 17(9):2302–2309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park MH, Shin BS, Namgung H (2013) Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT for blunt small bowel perforation. Clin Imaging 37(5):884–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Graña L, Pedraja I, Mendez R et al (2009) Jejuno-ileal diverticulitis with localized perforation: CT and US findings. Eur J Radiol 71(2):318–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Macari M, Faust M, Liang H et al (2007) CT of jejuna diverticulitis: imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and clinical management. Clin Radiol 62:73–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Katz DS, Scheirey CD, Bordia R et al (2013) Computed tomography of miscellaneous regional and diffuse small bowel disorders. Radiol Clin North Am 51:45–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsujimoto H, Yaguchi Y, Hiraki S et al (2011) Peritoneal computed tomography attenuation values reflect the severity of peritonitis caused by gastrointestinal perforations. Am J Surg 202:455–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi AL, Jang KM, Kim MJ et al (2011) What determines the periportal free air, and ligamentum teres and falciform ligament signs on CT: can these specific air distributions be valuable predictors of gastroduodenal perforation? Eur J Radiol 77:319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cho HS, Yoon SE, Park SH et al (2009) Distinction between upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation: usefulness of the periportal free air sign on computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 69:108–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yeung KW, Chang MS, Hsiao CP et al (2004) CT evaluation of gastrointestinal tract perforation. Clin Imaging 28(5):329–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghekiere O, Lesnik A, Hoa D et al (2007) Value of computed tomography in the diagnosis of the cause of nontraumatic gastrointestinal tract perforation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:169–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefania Romano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Romano, S. (2015). Small Bowel Perforations: Imaging Findings. In: Romano, L., Pinto, A. (eds) Imaging of Alimentary Tract Perforation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08192-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08192-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08191-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08192-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics