Advertisement

The Effects of Security Threats on Antecedents of Police Legitimacy

  • Tal Jonathan-Zamir
  • David Weisburd
  • Badi Hasisi
Chapter
  • 601 Downloads

Abstract

The legitimacy literature suggests that the strongest antecedent of police legitimacy are evaluations of “procedural justice,” or the fairness embedded in police processes and behavior, followed by assessments of police performance, which are concerned with police accomplishments. In this chapter we raise the question of applicability of these models to situations of acute security threats. Under threat, when the public is affected by uncertainty and fear, citizens may be more concerned with outcomes and less worried about fair processes. We use a natural experiment to examine and compare antecedents of police legitimacy across two groups of Israeli citizens, one facing immediate, severe, security threats (missile threats and attacks on the Israeli town of “Sderot”) and the other not facing acute threats at the time. The results indicate that when faced with acute missile threats, people in “Sderot” did value police performance more than in other Israeli communities, where there was no specific threat in the background. At the same time, under threat procedural justice did not decline in importance for the public. Moreover, in line with previous studies, in both situations procedural justice remained the primary predictor of police legitimacy.

Keywords

Procedural Justice Police Performance Security Threat Gaza Strip Fair Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bar-Tal, D., & Labin, D. (2001). The effect of a major event on stereotyping: Terrorist attacks in Israel and Israeli adolescents’ perceptions of Palestinians, Jordanians and Arabs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(3), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barzilai, G. (2005). Communities and law: Politics and cultures of legal identities. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bayley, D., & Weisburd, D. (2009). Cops and spooks: The role of the police in counterterrorism. In D. Weisburd, T. Feucht, I. Hakimi, M. Lois, & S. Perry (Eds.), To protect and to serve: Policing in an age of terrorism (pp. 81–99). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bettencourt, A. B., Dorr, N., Charlton, K., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 520–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowling, B. (1999). Violent racism: Victimization, policing and social control. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  6. Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., Greenberg, J., Gelfand, M. J., Francesco, A. M., Chen, Z. X., … & Shapiro, D. (2001). Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(4), 300–315.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, B., & Benedict, W. (2002). Perceptions of the police: Past findings, methodological issues, conceptual issues and policy implications. Policing, 25, 543–580.Google Scholar
  8. Browne, M. J., & Hoyt, R. E. (2000). The demand for flood insurance: Empirical evidence. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20(3), 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, D. W., & Silver, B. D. (2004). Civil liberties versus security in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 28–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dekel, R., & Nuttman-Shwartz, O. (2009). Posttraumatic stress and growth: The contribution of cognitive appraisal and sense of belonging to the country. Health and Social Work, 34(2), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferraro, K. F. (1996). Women’s fear of victimization: Shadow of sexual assault? Social Forces, 75, 667–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedland, N., & Merari, A. (1985). The psychological impact of terrorism: A double-edged sword. Political Psychology, 6(4), 591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallagher, C., Maguire, E., Mastrofski, S., & Reisig, M. (2001). The public image of the police: Final report to the international association of chiefs of police. Manassas, VA: George Mason University, Administration of Justice Program. Retrieved from http://www.theiacp.org/profassist/ethics/public_image.htm.Google Scholar
  14. Gordon, C., & Arian, A. (2001). Threat and decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(2), 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gross, O., & Ní Aoláin, F. (2006). Law in times of crisis: Emergency powers in theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hasisi, B., Alpert, G., & Flynn, D. (2009). The impacts of policing terrorism on society: Lessons from Israel and the US. In D. Weisburd, T. Feucht, I. Hakimi, M. Lois, & S. Perry (Eds.), To protect and to serve: Policing in an age of terrorism (pp. 177–202). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hasisi, B., & Weitzer, R. (2007). Police relations with Arabs and Jews in Israel. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 728–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henderson, N., Ortiz, C. W., Sugie, N. F., & Miller, J. (2006). Law enforcement and Arab American community relations after september 11, 2001: Technical report. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  19. Herrmann, R. K., Tetlock, P. E., & Visser, P. S. (1999). Mass public decisions to go to war: A cognitive-interactionist framework. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 553–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hinds, L., & Murphy, K. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Capelos, T., & Provost, C. (2002). The consequences of terrorism: Disentangling the effects of personal and national threat. Political Psychology, 23, 485–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Taber, C., & Lahav, G. (2005). Threat, anxiety, and support of anti-terrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 610–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huddy, L., Feldman, S., & Weber, C. (2007). The political consequences of perceived threat and felt insecurity. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 614, 13–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies (Vol. 20). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Innes, M. (2006). Policing uncertainty: Countering terror through community intelligence and democratic policing. Annals of the American Academy, 605, 222–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center. (2007). Rocket threat from the Gaza Strip, 2000-2007. Israel: Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Israel Intelligence Heritage and Commemoration Center (IICC). Retrieved July 14, 2009, from http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/pdf/rocket_threat_e.pdf
  27. Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center. (2009). Summary of rocket fire and mortar shelling in 2008. Israel: Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Israel Intelligence Heritage and Commemoration Center (IICC). Retrieved July 14, 2009, from http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/pdf/ipc_e007.pdf
  28. International Association of Chiefs of Police. (2005). Post 9/11 policing: The crime-control-homeland security paradigm—Taking command of new realities. Alexandria, VA: International Association of Chiefs of Police.Google Scholar
  29. Jentleson, B. W. (1992). The pretty prudent public: Post-Vietnam American opinion on the use of force. International Studies Quarterly, 36(1), 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jentleson, B. W., & Britton, R. L. (1998). Still pretty prudent: Post-cold war American public opinion on the use of military force. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(4), 395–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelman, H. C., & Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of obedience. New Haven, CT: Yale.Google Scholar
  32. LaFree, G. (1998). Losing legitimacy: Street crime and the decline of institutions in America. Boulder, CO: Westview Perseus.Google Scholar
  33. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mastrofski, S. D. (2006). Community policing: A skeptical view. In D. Weisburd & A. Braga (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 44–73). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Mastrofski, S. D., Snipes, J. B., & Supina, A. E. (1996). Compliance on demand: The public’s responses to specific police requests. Journal of Crime and Delinquency, 33, 269–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Murphy, K., Hinds, L., & Fleming, J. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing and Society, 18(2), 136–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. National Research Council. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices. In W. Skogan & K. Frydl (Eds.), Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  38. Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  39. Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Bachman, R., & Sherman, L. W. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law and Society Review, 31, 163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rattner, A. (2009). The culture of the law: The law and judicial system in the eyes of the Israeli society, a longitudinal study 2000–2009. Jerusalem, Israel: The Shasha Center for Strategic Studies, The Federmann School of Public Policy and Government, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem [In Hebrew].Google Scholar
  42. Reisig, M. D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1005–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sampson, R. J., & Bartusch, D. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law and Society Review, 32, 777–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sattler, D. N., Kaiser, C. F., & Hittner, J. B. (2000). Disaster preparedness: Relationships among prior experience, personal characteristics, and distress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(7), 1396–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shamir, M., & Sagiv-Schifter, T. (2006). Conflict, identity and tolerance: Israel in the Al-Aqsa intifada. Political Psychology, 27(3), 569–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith, D. A., & Uchida, C. D. (1988). The social organization of self-help. American Sociological Review, 53, 94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Struch, N., & Schwartz, S. H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 364–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sullivan, J. L., Piereson, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1982). Political tolerance and American democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sullivan, J. L., Shamir, M., Walsh, P., & Roberts, N. S. (1985). Political tolerance in context: Support for un-popular minorities in Israel, New Zealand, and the United States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  50. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37, 513–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tankebe, J. (2009). Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural fairness matter? Criminology, 47(4), 1265–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thacher, D. (2005). The local role in homeland security. Law and Society Review, 39(3), 635–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Tyler, T. R. (1994). Governing amid diversity: Can fair decision-making procedures bridge competing public interests and values? Law and Society Review, 28, 701–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tyler, T. R. (2000). Multiculturalism and the willingness of citizens to defer to law and to legal authorities. Law and Social Inquiry, 25(3), 983–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tyler, T. R. (2001). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from legal authorities? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tyler, T. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May, 593–608.Google Scholar
  58. Tyler, T. R. (2009). Legitimacy and criminal justice: The benefits of self-regulation. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 7, 307–359.Google Scholar
  59. Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. A. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.Google Scholar
  60. Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust in the law. New York, NY: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  61. Tyler, T. R., Schulhofer, S., & Huq, A. Z. (2010). Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counterterrorism policing: A study of Muslim Americans. Law and Society Review, 44(2), 365–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tyler, T. R., & Wakslak, C. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 18, 267–274.Google Scholar
  63. Weber, M. (1968). In G. Roth and C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and society. New York: Bedminster.Google Scholar
  64. Weisburd, D., & Britt, C. (2007). Statistics in criminal justice. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  65. Yagil, D., & Rattner, A. (2002). Between commandments and laws: Religiosity, political ideology, and legal obedience in Israel. Crime, Law and Social Change, 38, 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tal Jonathan-Zamir
    • 1
  • David Weisburd
    • 1
    • 2
  • Badi Hasisi
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Criminology, Faculty of LawHebrew University of Jerusalem Mount ScopusJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Criminology, Law and SocietyGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations