Abstract
Current 3D imaging modalities generate a wealth of diagnostic information, yet this information is underused in orthopaedics because of the lack of orthopaedic-specific imaging software. In this chapter, we detail how orthopaedic-specific imaging software can improve the diagnostic and planning capabilities of 3D imaging. Specifically, we describe the importance of biomechanical reference frames, as well as how to establish these reference frames using anatomical landmarks. Once these reference frames are established, this provides a basis for surgeon-specific views (i.e. views that the surgeon can directly compare to the operating room) as well as precise joint replacement component measurements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Henckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K, Harris S, Rodriguez y Baena FM, Barrett ARW, et al. Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement. The imperial knee protocol. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(11):1513–8.
Arai N, Nakamura S, Matsushita T, Suzuki S. Minimal radiation dose computed tomography for measurement of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(2):263–70.
OrthoExpert. OrthoImagingSolutions, Ltd; 2012.
Whiteside LA, Arima J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;321:168.
Middleton FR, Palmer SH. How accurate is Whiteside’s line as a reference axis in total knee arthroplasty? Knee. 2007;14(3):204–7.
Lenz NM, Mane A, Maletsky LP, Morton NA. The effects of femoral fixed body coordinate system definition on knee kinematic description. J Biomech Eng. 2008;130(2):021014.
Hepinstall MS, Ranawat AS. Landmarks for optimizing component position in total knee arthroplasty. Curr Orthop Pract. 2008;19(2):147.
Berger R, Crossett L, Jacobs J, Rubash H. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:144.
Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:46.
Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89(2):236.
Siston RA, Goodman SB, Patel JJ, Delp SL, Giori NJ. The high variability of tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:65.
Uehara K, Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, Ohashi H, Yamano Y. Bone anatomy and rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;402:196.
Seo Y, Mari C, Hasegawa BH. Technological development and advances in single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. Semin Nucl Med. 2008;38(3):177–98.
Dye SF. The pathophysiology of patellofemoral pain: a tissue homeostasis perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:100–10.
Luyckx T, Didden K, Vandenneucker H, Labey L, Innocenti B, Bellemans J. Is there a biomechanical explanation for anterior knee pain in patients with patella alta?: influence of patellar height on patellofemoral contact force, contact area and contact pressure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(3):344–50.
MacIntyre NJ, Hill NA, Fellows RA, Ellis RE, Wilson DR. Patellofemoral joint kinematics in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(12):2596–605.
Hirschmann MT, Iranpour F, Davda K, Rasch H, Hügli R, Friederich NF. Combined single-photon emission computerized tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT): clinical value for the knee surgeons? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(3):341–5.
Petersson IF, Boegård T, Saxne T, Silman AJ, Svensson B. Radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee classified by the Ahlbäck and Kellgren & Lawrence systems for the tibiofemoral joint in people aged 35–54 years with chronic knee pain. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56(8):493–6.
Hart AJ, Sabah S, Henckel J, Lewis A, Cobb J, Sampson B, et al. The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(6):738–44.
Dye SF, Chew MH. The use of scintigraphy to detect increased osseous metabolic activity about the knee. Instr Course Lect. 1994;43:453–69.
Hirschmann MT, Wagner CR, Rasch H, Henckel J. Standardized volumetric 3D-analysis of SPECT/CT imaging in orthopaedics: overcoming the limitations of qualitative 2D analysis. BMC Med Imaging. 2012;12(1):5.
Hirschmann MT, Iranpour F, Konala P, Kerner A, Rasch H, Cobb JP, et al. A novel standardized algorithm for evaluating patients with painful total knee arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(7):939–44.
Hirschmann MT, Mathis D, Afifi FK, Rasch H, Henckel J, Amsler F, et al. Single photon emission computerized tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) for evaluation of patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a novel standardized algorithm combining mechanical and metabolic information. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;21(4):965–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wagner, C.R., Hirschmann, M.T., Beasley, R.A. (2015). 7 Specific Orthopaedic Imaging Analysis Software: Clinical Benefit for TKR Revision Surgeon. In: Hirschmann, M., Becker, R. (eds) The Unhappy Total Knee Replacement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08099-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08099-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08098-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08099-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)