Skip to main content

3 There Is an Optimal Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Replacement: Femoral Rotation Does Matter!

  • Chapter
The Unhappy Total Knee Replacement

Abstract

Malrotation of the femoral and/or tibial TKR component leads to an asymmetric, unbalanced flexion gap, instability in flexion or stiffness, anterior knee pain, or patellar maltracking. Typically patients have pain when climbing stairs or complain about a limited range of motion. Optimal rotational alignment remains an important challenge, and several techniques have been described for determining the femoral rotational alignment in TKR. There is no single reference axis or surgical technique which should be used in every single patient. Most instruments use the posterior femoral condyles as a standard; therefore, the surgical transepicondylar axis and the anteroposterior trochlear line can be used to verify femoral rotation. Surgeons, who prefer the flexion gap balanced technique, may also need to use these bony landmarks to verify femoral rotation. The extension gap first technique combines the bony landmarks with the flexion gap balanced technique to identify femoral rotational alignment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:144–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Whiteside LA, Arima J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;321:168–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Laskin RS. Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10(5):657–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Talbot S, Bartlett J. The anterior surface of the femur as a new landmark for femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(3):258–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cui WQ, Won YY, Baek MH, Kim KK, Cho JH. Variations of the ‘grand-piano sign’ during total knee replacement. A computer-simulation study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(11):1441–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Howell SM, Howell SJ, Kuznik KT, Cohen J, Hull ML. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(3):1000–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:40–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Victor J. Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95(5):365–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spahn G, Hofmann GO, von Engelhardt LV, Li M, Neubauer H, Klinger HM. The impact of a high tibial valgus osteotomy and unicondylar medial arthroplasty on the treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;11:1751–2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshino N, Takai S, Ohtsuki Y, Hirasawa Y. Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(4):493–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD. The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:111–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eckhoff D, Hogan C, DiMatteo L, Robinson M, Bach J. Difference between the epicondylar and cylindrical axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;461:238–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lustig S, Lavoie F, Selmi TA, Servien E, Neyret P. Relationship between the surgical epicondylar axis and the articular surface of the distal femur: an anatomic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(7):674–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(9):1331–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:35–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanada H, Whiteside LA, Steiger J, Dyer P, Naito M. Bone landmarks are more reliable than tensioned gaps in TKA component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;462:137–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagamine R, Miura H, Inoue Y, Urabe K, Matsuda S, Okamoto Y, Nishizawa M, Iwamoto Y. Reliability of the anteroposterior axis and the posterior condylar axis for determining rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 1998;3(4):194–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Olcott CW, Scott RD. The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:39–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Insall JN. Surgical Techniques and Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty. p. 739. In: Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, Kelly MA, Aglietti P, editors. Surgery of the knee. New York: Churchill-Livingstone; 1993. p. 739–804.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Matziolis G, Boenicke H, Pfiel S, Wassilew G, Perka C. The gap technique does not rotate the femur parallel to the epicondylar axis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;18:1113–4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Heesterbeek PJ, Jacobs WC, Wymenga AB. Effects of the balanced gap technique on femoral component rotation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(4):1015–22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee DH, Padhy D, Park JH, Jeong WK, Park JH, Han SB. The impact of a rectangular or trapezoidal flexion gap on the femoral component rotation in TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(7):1141–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stiehl JB, Cherveny PM. Femoral rotational alignment using the tibial shaft axis in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:47–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoshioka Y, Cooke TD. Femoral anteversion: assessment based on function axes. J Orthop Res. 1987;5(1):86–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moyad TF, Hughes RE, Urquhart A. “Grand piano sign,” a marker for proper femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2003;40(7):348–52.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hofmann S, Romero J, Roth-Schiffl E, Albrecht T. Rotational malalignment of the components may cause chronic pain or early failure in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopade. 2003;32(6):469–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Insall JN. The impact of femoral component rotational alignment on condylar lift-off. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:148–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Romero J, Stahelin T, Wyss T, Hofmann S. Significance of axial rotation alignment of components of knee prostheses. Orthopade. 2003;32(6):461–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT. The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;287:170–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Math K, Dennis DA, Anderson DT. Correlation between condylar lift-off and femoral component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;403:143–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Boldt JG, Stiehl JB, Hodler J, Zanetti M, Munzinger U. Femoral component rotation and arthrofibrosis following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2006;30(5):420–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:46–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pietsch M, Hofmann S. Early revision for isolated internal malrotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(6):1057–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Miller MC, Zhang AX, Petrella AJ, Berger RA, Rubash HE. The effect of component placement on knee kinetics after arthroplasty with an unconstrained prosthesis. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(4):614–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bargren JH. Total knee dislocation due to rotatory malalignment of tibial component: a case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;147:271–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Puloski SK, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Tibial post wear in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. An unrecognized source of polyethylene debris. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(3):390–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C. An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:213–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cobb JP, Dixon H, Dandachli W, Iranpour F. The anatomical tibial axis: reliable rotational orientation in knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(8):1032–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Pietsch MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pietsch, M., Djahani, O., Hofmann, S. (2015). 3 There Is an Optimal Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Replacement: Femoral Rotation Does Matter!. In: Hirschmann, M., Becker, R. (eds) The Unhappy Total Knee Replacement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08099-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08099-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08098-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08099-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics