Skip to main content

E-Government 2.0: Back to Reality, a 2.0 Application to Vet

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

E-government 2.0 refers to the inclusions of features like social web, user-generated content, the delivery and use of open data, and network effects through more user engagement. Integrating Web 2.0 technologies into e-government is expected to create opportunities to improve online public services quality, change the relationship with citizens and businesses. The integration of web 2.0 in e-government can contribute to achieve new e-government strategic objectives and policies. Yet it provides many practical and theoretical challenges as research is limited in this field. The accomplishment of the benefits and strategic contribution might be more difficult than initially anticipated.

This chapter goes back to the origins of e-government 2.0 concept and compares to initial e-government concept with regard to characteristics, related issues and research questions. Then, this chapter provides an overview of the book content—a comprehensive collection of research works concerning e-government 2.0 implementations by showing cases and business models enabled by various technologies and developed in different countries across America, Europe, Africa and Asia. E-government 2.0 is approached from the view of theory and practice interaction in this book. Contributions are based on concrete practical studies or suggested new solutions to guide e-government 2.0 initiatives grounded on the reality of the context. Many examples are available and the goal is to learn from the examples rather than on the buzz of the term and sometimes the “theoretical” speculation with plenty unproven assumptions and promises (e.g. Gartner hype curve, IT magazines, even some research papers and reports, etc). Government 2.0 is out there and much can be learned from the existing experiences. In sum, the content of the book attempts to lift the veil on challenges facing e-government 2.0 wide-spread adoption and to contribute to e-government literature towards a theoretical and strategic framework for guiding new 2.0 initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch, 60(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Assar S., Boughzala I. (Eds). (2007). Administration électronique: constats et perspectives. Paris: Hermès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assar, S., & Boughzala, I. (2013). E-Government evolution priorities from a Web 2.0 perspective: An exploratory field study. Proceedings 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 2072–2081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assar S., Boughzala I., Boydens I. (Eds). (2010). Practical Studies in e-government: Best practices from around the world. NY: Springer, December 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assar, S., Boughzala, I., & Boydens, I. (2011). Practical studies in e-government: Best practices from around the world (ISBN:978–1441975324). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government 2.0 Taskforce (AGT). (2009). Department of finance and deregulation: Engage: Getting on with Government 2.0. http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/gov20taskforcereport/. Accessed 9 Apr 2014.

  • Baumgarten, J., & Chui, B. (2009). e-Government. McKinsey Quarterly, n°4. http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Business_Technology/E-government_20_2408. Accessed 9 Apr 2014.

  • Boughzala, I. (2010). Mise en perspective de l’e-collaboration comme outil de transformation de l’organisation. HDR Sciences de Gestion. Nantes: Université de Nantes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boughzala, I. (2011). Collaboration 2.0 through the new organization transformation. In I. Boughzala & A. Dudezert (Eds.), Knowledge management 2.0: Organizational models and enterprise strategies. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W., & Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, S. A., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2012). Social media in government. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 441–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, S. A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity, 15, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaio, A. (2009). Government 2.0: A Gartner definition. http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/11/13/government-2-0-a-gartner-definition/. Accessed 8 Mar 2014.

  • Dixon, B. (2010). Towards E-Government 2.0: An assessment of where e-Government 2.0 is and where it is headed. Public Administration and Management, 15(2), 418–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC-European Commission. (2009). E-Government benchmark survey 2009: Smarter, faster, better e-Government. http://www.epractice.eu/en/library/299159. Accessed 9 Apr 2014.

  • Gascó, M. (2003). New technologies and institutional change in public administration. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönlund, Å., & Horan, T. A. (2005). Introducing e-Gov: History, definitions, and issues. Communications of the AIS, 15(1), 713–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, J. (2008). Crowdsourcing, why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, G., & Hayllar, M. R. (2010). Creating public value in e-government: A public-private-citizen collaboration framework in Web 2.0. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69, S120–S131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, A., & Løvdal, E. (2009). Can ICT reform public agencies? dans Electronic Government (EGOV 2009). In M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl, M. Janssen & R. Traunmüller (Eds.), LNCS (pp. 88–102). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance: Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), S1–S8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2014). Infomediary business models for connecting open data providers and users. Social Science Computer Review. Published online before print March 24, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0894439314525902. http://ssc.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/01/30/0894439314525902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroes, N. (2011). Press conference on open data strategy brussels. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-11-872_en.htm?locale=en. Retrieved June 2013.

  • McAfee, A. P. (2006). Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration. Sloan Management Review, 47(3), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, A. J., Koops, B. J., Pieterson, W., Overman, S., & ten Tije, S. (2012). Government 2.0: Key challenges to its realization. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 10, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, T. (2011). New ends, new means, but old attitudes: Citizens’ views on open government and government 2.0. Proceedings 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 4–7 Jan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, T., & Sayogo, D. S. (2011). Government 2.0 collects the wisdom of crowds. In dans Social Informatics, A. Datta, S. Shulman, B. Zheng, S.-D. Lin, A. Sun, & E.-P. Lim (Eds.), LNCS (pp. 51–58). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html. Accessed 5 Nov 2012.

  • O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies, 65(Q1), 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osimo, D. (2008). Web 2.0 in government: Why and how? Luxembourg: European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osimo, D., Campbell, D., Kerr-Stevens, J., Bishop, C., & Bryant, L. (2009). Public services 2.0: Web 2.0 from the periphery to the centre of public service delivery. Brussels: European Commission Information Society and Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satyanarayana, J. (2006). e-Government principles, national institute for smart government. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEGOVERNMENT/Resources/eGovPrinciplesJS5Nov06.ppt. Accessed 9 Apr 2014.

  • Scholl, H. J. (2007). Central research questions in e-government, or which trajectory should the study domain take? Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1, 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, H. J., & Luna-Reyes, L. (2011). Uncovering dynamics of open government, transparency, participation, and collaboration. Proceedings 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 4–7 Jan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susha, I., & Grönlund, Å. (2012). e-Participation research: Systematizing the field. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, L., Pina, V., & Royo, S. (2005). E-government and the transformation of public administrations in EU countries: Beyond NPM or just a second wave of reforms? Online Information Review, 29(5), 531–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traunmüller, R. (2010). Web 2.0 creates a new government. In K. N. Andersen, E. Francesconi, Å. Grönlund, & T. M. van Engers (Eds.), Electronic government and the information systems perspective (pp. 77–83). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations’ Global E-Government Survey. (2012). http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/global_reports/12report.htm/. Accessed 9 Apr 2014.

  • Weerakkody, V., & Dhillon, G. (2008). Moving from e-Government to T-Government: A study of process re-engineering challenges in a UK local authority perspective. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(4), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of research on ICT-enabled transformational government: A global perspective. ISBN:1-60566-390-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, M. A., Codagnone, C., & Janssen, M. (2008). Future e-government research: 13 ­research themes identified in the eGovRTD2020 project. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-41), 7–10 Jan, Big Island, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 646–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Here we, editors, with to give a special thank you first to all the authors for their contribution to this book. Second, to the reviewers for their help, constructive comments and feedback regarding the content of the book. Third, to Dr David Osimo for accepting to preface the book. Finally, thanks to Springer for agreeing to publish this book.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imed Boughzala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boughzala, I., Janssen, M., Assar, S. (2015). E-Government 2.0: Back to Reality, a 2.0 Application to Vet. In: Boughzala, I., Janssen, M., Assar, S. (eds) Case Studies in e-Government 2.0. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08081-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics