Skip to main content

Abstract

Researchers have studied extensively regional variation in religious commitment and participation (religiosity). Such research, whether based on economic theory or evolutionary theory, emphasizes the high costs to individuals of religiosity. We have offered a new hypothesis of religiosity based on the parasite-stress theory of values. It relies on the theory of honest signaling in biology. We propose that religiosity is one important way that people engage in and display their in-group allegiance and boundary in order to avoid and manage infectious disease threats. In support of this, we provide evidence that religiosity is an aspect of in-group assortative sociality—and therefore an aspect of the behavioral immune system—and that religiosity correlates positively with parasite adversity, both cross-nationally and across states of the USA. We suggest additional tests of the parasite-stress theory’s application to religiosity. Other hypotheses of religiosity in the literature are evaluated. The parasite-stress theory of values appears to best account for religiosity and its diversity across regions. Our findings on religiosity have implications for a multitude of other areas of research such as secularization, health, ontogeny of religious values, life history, and geographical expansions of religion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altizer, S., Nunn, C. L., Thrall, P. H. et al. (2003). Social organization and parasite risk in mammals: Integrating theory and empirical studies. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 34: 517–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, D. B., Kurian, G. T., & Johnson, T. M., Eds. (2001). World Christian Encyclopedia: A Comparative Survey of Churches and Religions in the Modern World, Volume 1: The World by Countries: Religionists, Churches, Ministries, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulbulia, J. (2004a). Religious costs as adaptations that signal altruistic intention. Evolution and Cognition 10: 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulbulia, J. (2004b). The cognitive and evolutionary psychology of religion. Biology and Philosophy 19: 655–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulbulia, J., & Mahoney, A. (2008). Religious solidarity: The hand grenade experiment. Journal of Cognition and Culture 8: 295–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, M., & Gorski, P. S. (2001). Religious pluralism and religious participation. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, L. (1994). Evolutionary theories of morality and the manipulative use of signals. Zygon 29: 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Barra, M., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C. et al. (2013). Illness in childhood predicts face preferences in adulthood. Evolution and Human Behavior 34: 384–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delamontagne, R. G. (2010). High religiosity and societal dysfunction in the United States during the first decade of the twenty-first century. Evolutionary Psychology 8: 617–657.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. W. W. Norton and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppig, C., Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2010). Parasite prevalence and the worldwide distribution of cognitive ability. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 277: 3801–3808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppig, C., Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2011). Parasite prevalence and the distribution of intelligence among the states of the USA. Intelligence 39: 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, J., Schaller, M., Park, J. H. et al. (2004). Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 7: 333–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueredo, A. J., & Wolf, P. S. A. (2009). Assortative pairing and life history strategy: A cross-cultural study. Human Nature 20: 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012). Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35: 61–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2008b). Assortative sociality, limited dispersal, infectious disease and the genesis of the global pattern of religion diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences 275: 2587–2594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, D. N., Swartwout, P., & Sosis, R. (2009). The socio-religious brain: A developmental model. Proceedings of the British Academy 158: 287–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Nishii, L. H., et al. (2004). Individualism and collectivism. In Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (eds. R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan et al.), pp. 437–512. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, L. K., Ellison, C. G., & Larson, D. B. (2002). Explaining the relationships between religious involvement and health. Psychological Inquiry 13: 190–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladden, P. R., Welch, J., Figueredo, A. J. et al. (2009). Moral intuitions and religiosity as spuriously correlated life history traits. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 7: 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim, B. J., & Finke, R. (2006). International religion indexes: Government regulation, government favoritism, and social regulation of religion. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion 2: 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guégan, J. -F., & Constantin De Magny, G. (2007). Epidemiology in a changing world: The need for a bigger picture! Encyclopedia of Infectious Diseases: Modern Methodologies (ed. M. Tibayrenc), pp. 569–589. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guernier, V., Hochberg, M. E., & Guégan, J. -F. (2004). Ecology drives the worldwide distribution of human diseases. PLoS Biology 2: 740–746.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassall, C., & Sherratt, T. N. (2011). Statistical inference and spatial patterns in correlates of IQ. Intelligence 39: 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J. (2009). The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion: Credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior 30: 244–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iannaccone, L. R. (1994). Why strict churches are strong. American Journal of Sociology 99: 1180–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review 65: 19–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irons, W. (1996). In our own self image: The evolution of morality, deception, and religion. Skeptic 4: 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irons, W. (2001). Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. Evolution and the Capacity for Commitment (ed. R. M. Nesse), pp.292–309. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irons, W. (2008). Why people believe (what other people see as) crazy ideas. The Evolution of Religion: Studies, Theories, and Critiques (eds. J. Bulbulia, R. Sosis, C. Genet et al.), pp. 51–57. Collins Foundation Press, Santa Margarita, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. M., & Hunsberger, B. (1999). An intergroup perspective on religion and prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 38: 509–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. (2008). Gods of war: The adaptive logic of religious conflict. In The Evolution of Religion: Studies, Theories, and Critiques (eds. J. Bulbulia, R. Sosis, C. Genet et al.), pp.111–117. Collins Foundation Press, Santa Margarita, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G. (1997). Is Religion Good for Your Health? Effects of Religion on Mental and Physical Health. Haworth Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, H., & Ots, I. (2006). When not to avoid inbreeding. Evolution 60: 467–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kosmin, B. A., Mayer, E., & Keysar, A. (2001). American Religious Identification Survey 2001, pp. 1–46. The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letendre, K., Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2010). Does infectious disease cause global variation in the frequency of intrastate armed conflict and civil war? Biological Reviews 85: 669–683.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, A. D., Mathers, C. D., Ezzati, M. et al. (2006). Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: Systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 367: 1747–1757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R., Harvey, J., & Nyborg, H. (2009). Average intelligence predicts atheism rates across 137 nations. Intelligence 37: 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCleary, R. M., & Barro, R. J. (2006). Religion and political economy in an international panel. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 45: 149–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2010). Historical prevalence of infectious diseases within 230 geopolitical regions: A tool for investigating origins of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 41: 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science 322: 58–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oaten, M., Stevenson, R. J. & Case, T. I. (2009). Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin 135: 303–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. H. & Schaller, M. (2005). Does attitude similarity serve as a heuristic cue for kinship? Evidence of an implicit cognitive association. Evolution and Human Behavior 26: 158–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price-Smith, A. T. (2002). The Health of Nations: Infectious Disease, Environmental Change, and Their Effects on National Security and Development. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, T. J. (2009). Is personal insecurity a cause of cross-national differences in the intensity of religious belief. Journal of Religion and Society 11: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossano, M. J. (2007). Supernaturalizing social life: Religion and the evolution of human cooperation. Human Nature 18: 272–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V., & Dernelle, R. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences 37: 721–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structures of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25: 1–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy, W. A., & Nowicki, S. (2005). The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegal, M. (1988). Children’s knowledge of contagion and contamination as causes of illness. Child Development 59: 1353–1359.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegal, M., Fadda, R., & Overton, P. G. (2011). Contamination sensitivity and the development of disease-avoidant behavior. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366: 3427–3432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. (2000). Religion and intragroup cooperation: Preliminary results of a comparative analysis of utopian communities. Cross-Cultural Research 34: 70–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. (2003). Why aren’t we all Hutterities? Costly signaling theory and religious behavior. Human Nature-An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective 14: 91–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. (2005). Does religion promote trust? The role of signaling, reputation, and punishment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion 1: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2003). Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology 12: 264–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., & Bressler, E. R. (2003). Cooperation and commune longevity: A test of the costly signaling theory of religion. Cross-Cultural Research 37: 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., Kress, H. C., & Boster, J. S. (2007). Scars for war: Evaluating alternative signaling explanations for cross-cultural variance in ritual costs. Evolution and Human Behavior 28: 234–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., & Ruffle, B. J. (2003). Religious ritual and cooperation: Testing for a relationship on Israeli religious and secular kibbutzim. Current Anthropology 44: 713–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, L. B., & Palmer, C. T. (2008). The Supernatural and Natural Selection: The Evolution of Religion. Paradigm Publishers, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J., Case, T. I. & Oaten, M. J. (2009). Frequency and recency of infection and their relationship with disgust and contamination sensitivity. Evolution and Human Behavior 30: 363–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J., Oaten, M. J., Case, T. I. et al. (2010). Children’s response to adult disgust elicitors: Development and acquisition. Developmental Psychology 46: 165–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terrizzi Jr., J. A., Shook, N. J., & Ventis, W. L. (2012). Religious conservatism: an evolutionarily evoked disease-avoidance strategy. Religion, Brain and Behavior 2: 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. (2008). The Evolutionary Biology of Human Female Sexuality. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., Fincher, C. L., & Aran, D. (2009). Parasites, democratization, and the liberalization of values across contemporary countries. Biological Reviews 84: 113–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Fincher, C. L. (2007). What is the relevance of attachment and life history to political values? Evolution and Human Behavior 28: 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, J. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2012). Immigration, parasitic infection, and United States religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35: 97–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Widman, D. R., Corcoran, K. E., & Nagy, R. E. (2009). Belonging to the same religion enhances the opinion of others’ kindness and morality. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology 3: 281–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, P. (2007). Atheism: Contemporary Numbers and Patterns. In The Cambridge Companion to Atheism (ed. M. Martin), pp. 47–65. Cambridge University Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thornhill, R., Fincher, C.L. (2014). Religiosity. In: The Parasite-Stress Theory of Values and Sociality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08040-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics