Advertisement

Moral Strata pp 95-131 | Cite as

Working with Moral Means

  • John R. Welch
Chapter
Part of the Theory and Decision Library A: book series (TDLA, volume 49)

Abstract

Chapter 4 treats the instrumental stratum of moral discourse. Since this stratum is composed of substrata that can be delimited in different ways, the chapter works up through progressively larger discursive chunks: individual sentences, inferences, and theories. The justifiability of individual sentences, whether instrumental descriptions such as ‘That shows the value of courage’ or instrumental directives such as ‘Be honest so that people will respect you’, is an initial theme. The chapter emphasizes the role of observation and inductive inference in evaluating such sentences. Inference is then treated by investigating the possibility of justifying practical inferences (including so-called practical syllogisms). The chapter maintains that practical inferences can be evaluated by appeal to the standard of inductive cogency. Finally, how to choose a moral theory on instrumental grounds is illustrated by an extended analysis of Kantian, Benthamite, and Frankenian theory as applied to Sophie’s choice. The analysis leans heavily on the comparative decision theory launched in Chap. 3.

Keywords

Decision Theory Action Action Moral Theory Condition Schema Moral Discourse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allan, D. J. 1955. The practical syllogism. In Autour d’Aristote, ed. Auguste Mansion, 325–340. Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
  2. Angner, Erik. 2013. Is it possible to measure happiness? European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3:221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aquinas, Thomas. 1265–1273. Summa theologica. English edition: Aquinas, Thomas. 1947. Summa theologica (trans: Fathers of the English Dominican Province). New York: Benziger Brothers.Google Scholar
  4. Aristotle. 1984. Movement of animals. In The complete works of Aristotle, ed. Jonathan Barnes, Vol. I, 1087–1096. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Aristotle. 1984. Nicomachean ethics. In The complete works of Aristotle, ed. Jonathan Barnes, Vol. II, 1729–1867. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Aristotle. 1984. On the soul. In The complete works of Aristotle, ed. Jonathan Barnes, Vol. I, 641–692. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Aristotle. 1984. Politics. In The complete works of Aristotle, ed. Jonathan Barnes, Vol. II, 1986–2129. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Audi, Robert. 1989. Practical reasoning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Audi, Robert. 2004. Reasons, practical reason, and practical reasoning. Ratio 17:110–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, and Rudolf Carnap. 1953. Semantic information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4:147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bentham, Jeremy. 1789. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Rpt. London: University of London, Athlone Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  12. Bok, Sissela. 1979. Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  13. Broome, John. 2001. Normative practical reasoning. Supplement to the Proceedings of The Aristotelian Society 75:175–193.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, John. 1922. Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. In The middle works, 1899–1924, eds. Jo Ann Boydston and Patricia Baysinger, vol. 14. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, John. 1938. Logic: The theory of inquiry. In The later works, 1925–1953, ed. Jo Ann Boydston, vol. 12. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. Donagan, Alan. 1977. The theory of morality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dummett, Michael. 2006. Thought and reality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldman, Fred. 1978. Introductory ethics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Floridi, Luciano. 2005. Semantic conceptions of information. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/information-semantic. Accessed 30 April 2014.
  20. Foot, Philippa. 1967. The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. The Oxford Review 5:5–15. Rpt. in Virtues and vices and other essays in moral philosophy, 19–32. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  21. Frankena, William K. 1973. Ethics. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Gert, Bernard. 2004. Common morality: Deciding what to do. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenspan, Patricia. 1983. Moral dilemmas and guilt. Philosophical Studies 43:117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harman, Gilbert. 1978. Reasons. In Practical reasoning, ed. Joseph Raz, 110–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Harwood, Sterling. 2003. Eleven objections to utilitarianism. In Moral philosophy: A reader, ed. Louis Pojman, 3rd ed., 179–192. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  26. Hausman, Daniel M. 1991. Is utilitarianism useless? Theory and Decision 30:273–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hempel, Carl G. 1965. Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: The Free Press. (London: Collier-Macmillan).Google Scholar
  28. Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan. Rpt. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994.Google Scholar
  29. Hume, David. 1739. A treatise of human nature. Rpt. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  30. Hurley, Peter E. 2006. Does consequentialism make too many demands, or none at all? Ethics 116:680–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Irwin, T. H. 2003. A sort of political science. In The classics of Western philosophy: A reader’s guide, eds. Jorge J. E. Gracia, Gregory M. Reichberg, and Bernard N. Schumacher, 56–69. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Kant, Immanuel. 1785. Grundlegung zur metaphysik der sitten. English edition: Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (trans. and ed: Gregor, M. J.). In Practical philosophy, 41–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kant, Immanuel. 1788. Kritik der praktischen vernunft. English edition: Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Critique of practical reason (trans. and ed: Gregor, M. J.). In Practical philosophy, 137–271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kant, Immanuel. 1797. Über ein vermeintes recht aus menschenliebe zu lügen. English edition: Kant, Immanuel. 1996. On a supposed right to lie from philanthropy (trans. and ed: Gregor, M. J.). In Practical philosophy, 609–615. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kenny, Anthony. 1979. Aristotle’s theory of the will. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kohn, Melvin. 1974. Occupational structure and alienation. American Journal of Sociology 82:111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Layard, Richard. 2005. Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  38. Lebus, Bruce. 1990. Moral dilemmas: Why they are hard to solve. Philosophical Investigations 13:110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Levi, Isaac. 1967. Gambling with truth: An essay on induction and the aims of science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  40. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mill, John Stuart. 1861. Utilitarianism. Rpt. in Collected works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 10, 203–259. Toronto: University of Toronto Press and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969.Google Scholar
  42. Nettle, Daniel. 2005. Happiness: The science behind your smile. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Nielsen, Kai. 1972. Against moral conservatism. Ethics 82:113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Prichard, H. A. 1912. Does moral philosophy rest upon a mistake? Rpt. in Moral obligation: Essays and lectures, 1–17. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  45. Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Richardson, Henry S. 1994. Practical reasoning about final ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1946. L’existentialisme est un humanisme. English edition: Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1956. Existentialism is a humanism. In Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, ed. Walter Kaufmann, 287–311. Cleveland: World.Google Scholar
  48. Schacht, Richard. 1994. The future of alienation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  49. Seeman, Melvin. 1959. On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review 24:783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. 2006. Moral skepticisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spielthenner, Georg. 2007. A logic of practical reasoning. Acta Analytica 22:139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Styron, William. 1979. Sophie’s choice. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  53. Von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1963. The varieties of goodness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  54. Von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1983. Practical reason: Philosophical papers, vol. 1. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Welch, John R. 1991. Reconstructing Aristotle: The practical syllogism. Philosophia 21:69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Welch, John R. 1994. Science and ethics: Toward a theory of ethical value. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 25:279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williams, Bernard, and J. J. C. Smart. 1973. Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1978. Remarks on the foundations of mathematics. Revised ed. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. Zimmerman, Michael J. 1996. The concept of moral obligation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saint Louis University – Madrid CampusMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations