Advertisement

Conclusion and Future Research

  • Dorien T. A. M. KooijEmail author
  • Denise M. Rousseau
  • P. Matthijs Bal
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter highlights key insights into the dynamics of older workers and the opportunities available to redesign both their work experiences and the practices of contemporary organizations to the benefit of both. It identifies key evidence-based principles to optimize the employee-employer relationship of aging workers to maintain their health, motivation and productivity. It lays out the most prominent future research avenues, as well as practical implications.

Keywords

Leadership Behavior Psychological Contract Employment Relationship Line Manager Future Time Perspective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bal, P. M., De Lange, A. H., Zacher, H., & Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2013). A lifespan perspective on psychological contracts and their relations with organizational commitment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bal, P. M., Kooij, D. T. A. M., & De Jong, S. B. (2013). How do developmental and accommodative HRM enhance employee engagement and commitment? The role of psychological contract and SOC-strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 545–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carstensen, L. L. (1995). Evidence for a life span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caza, B. B., & Milton, L. P. (2011). Resilience at work: Building capability in the face of adversity. In G. M. Spreitzer & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 895–908). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (2004). Aging, adult development, and work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29, 440–458.Google Scholar
  8. Kooij, D., De Lange, A., Jansen, P., & Dikkers, J. (2008). Older workers’ motivation to continue to work: Five meanings of age. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 364–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kooij, D. T. A. M., De Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G. W., & Dikkers, J. S. E. (2013). Beyond chronological age: Examining perceived future time and subjective health as age-related mediators in relation to work-related motivations and well-being. Work & Stress, 27, 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Luthar, S. S. (2006). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 739–795). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Seijts, G. H. (1998). The importance of future time perspective in theories of work motivation. The Journal of Psychology, 132, 154–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Staudinger, U. M., Marsiske, M., & Baltes, P. B. (1995). Resilience and reserve capacity in later adulthood: Potentials and limits of development across the life span. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 801–847). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Sterns, H. L., & Doverspike, D. (1989). Aging and the retraining and learning process in organizations. In I. Goldstein & R. Katzel (Eds.), Training and development in work organizations (pp. 229–332). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorien T. A. M. Kooij
    • 1
    Email author
  • Denise M. Rousseau
    • 2
    • 3
  • P. Matthijs Bal
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Human Resource StudiesUniversity of TilburgTilburgThe Netherlands
  2. 2.H. John Heinz III CollegeCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Tepper School of BusinessCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  4. 4.School of ManagementUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations