Skip to main content

An Evaluation of Indoor Environment in Deprived Community Housing in Yorkshire and the Humber Region of England, UK

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Progress in Sustainable Energy Technologies Vol II
  • 1687 Accesses

Abstract

This study has been undertaken as part of the BIG Energy Upgrade (BEU) a.k.a. Energy Innovation for Deprived Communities (EIDC) project, which aims to provide a detailed understanding of indoor environment and to deliver a new approach to energy efficiency and renewable energy projects within a minimum of ten of the most deprived communities across six Local Authorities in Yorkshire and the Humber region in the UK. It was important for the success of the BEU/EIDC project that detailed monitoring and post occupancy evaluation is performed on a sample of houses before rolling out wider refurbishment. The data were collected from the indoor monitoring equipment for two houses and statistically analysed to investigate the indoor thermal condition and air quality. Air temperature and relative humidity levels within an indoor environment will vary with the time of year and physical indoor environment. However, increased temperature within a confined space such as an indoor environment can create a more suitable environment for the growth of unwanted bacteria and fungi. With the guidelines, it would be reasonable to maintain a temperature of around 23–25 °C within a house. Also, if levels of humidity become too dry, i.e. below 40 % can have adverse effects, some people susceptible to sore throats due to the dryness of the air. Air temperature, relative humidity and carbon dioxide levels were monitored, and the results have been compared with the accepted standard guidelines such as ASHRAE and CIBSE. The results showed that the indoor thermal environment conditions in the two naturally ventilated homes had a mean air temperature and relative humidity of 20.5 °C and 47 % respectively during autumn season. The mean CO2 levels were in the range 520–1,400 ppm and followed a pattern rising during morning and evening periods in response to human indoor activity. Detailed analysis of CO2 at four periods during the day showed that afternoon times contained lower values of CO2 compared with morning and evening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. NRC. National Refurbishment Centre (NRC). http://www.rethinkingrefurbishment.com/. Accessed 26 Mar 2012

  2. Oreszczyn T, Hong S, Ridley I, Wilkinson P (2006) Determinants of winter indoor temperatures in low income households in England. Energy Buildings 38:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Altan H, Refaee M, Han L, Noguchi M (2013) Measured home environment and energy consumption compared to accepted standards. Open House Int 38(3):64–71

    Google Scholar 

  4. Refaee M, Altan H (2013) Trends of indoor environment and energy consumption incidence by human activities. J Eng Technol 2(2):110–115

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang Y, Barrett P (2012) Factors influencing the occupants’ window opening behaviour in a naturally ventilated office building. Energy Environ 50:125–134

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yoshino H, Yoshino Y, Zhang Q, Mochida A, Li N, Miyasaka Z (2006) Indoor thermal environment and energy saving for urban residential buildings in China. Energy Buildings 38:1308–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Isakssona C, Karlsson F (2006) Indoor climate in low-energy houses—an interdisciplinary investigation. Build Environ 41:1678–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saunders T (2002) The boiled frog syndrome: your health and the built environment. Thomas Wiley Academy, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  9. Molhave L (1987) The sick buildings—a sub-population among the problem buildings. In: Seifert B, Esdorn H, Fischer M (eds) Indoor Air’87, vol 2, Proceedings of the IV international conference on indoor air quality and climate. Institute for Water, Soil and Air Hygiene, Berlin, pp 469–473

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burge S, Hedge A, Wilson S (1987) Sick building syndrome: a study of 4373 office workers. Ann Occup Hyg 31:493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Onset. Onset Hobo Loggers. http://www.onsetcomp.com/products/. Accessed 22 Apr 2014

  12. MicroDAQ. Telaire 7001 carbon dioxide monitor. http://www.microdaq.com/telaire/. Accessed 22 Apr 2014

  13. ASHRAE (1992) ASHRAE Standard 62: ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  14. CIBSE (2006) Environmental design CIBSE guide A. Chartered Institution of Building Service Engineers, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is the result of the work undertaken as part of the BIG Energy Upgrade Programme (BEU). The project has attracted £7 million from the European Regional Development Fund through the Yorkshire and the Humber ERDF Programme 2007–2013. The authors would like to thank the Building Environments Analysis Unit (BEAU) Research Centre (2007–2013) at the University of Sheffield for making this research collaboration possible between both authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasim Altan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Altan, H., Refaee, M. (2014). An Evaluation of Indoor Environment in Deprived Community Housing in Yorkshire and the Humber Region of England, UK. In: Dincer, I., Midilli, A., Kucuk, H. (eds) Progress in Sustainable Energy Technologies Vol II. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07977-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07977-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07976-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07977-6

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics