Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 636 Accesses

Abstract

In his seminal study of 1912, Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse, Émile Durkheim argued that, since the dawn of human communal living, the basic habitat of religions has been the public domain; Durkheim located the notion of sacredness at the nexus of human practices and social projects. As far as the European continent is concerned, religions have been, indeed, molded within foro externo, as symbolic constructions of ‘collective identity’, closely related to the cultural construction of modernity and its institutionalization in nation-states. Even in the present time of post-modernity, they still bear, according to Jürgen Habermas, a valuable semantic potential for inspiring other people beyond the limits of a particular community of faith, once that potential is delivered in terms of its ‘profane truth content’. This notion is best exemplified in the case of religious cultural goods. The latter manifest an aesthetic synthesis of the sacred/profane qualities, since it is in their very nature to embody a complicated amalgam of the aesthetic and the numinous.

Remnants of things that have passed away,

Fragments of stone, reared by creatures of clay

The Siege of Corinth, 1816

Lord Byron

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Durkheim E. (1912) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, translated by Cosman C. (2001) Oxford University Press, p. 319.

  2. 2.

    For a constructive criticism on the notion of ‘collective identity’ see Vargas Llosa M. (2001) The Culture of Liberty, Foreign Policy No. 122, pp. 66–71.

  3. 3.

    Koenig M. (2007) Religion and Public Order in Modern Nation-States: Institutional Varieties and Contemporary Transformations, in: Brugger W. & M. Karayanni M. (eds.) Religion in the Public Sphere: A Comparative Analysis of German, Israeli, American and International Law [=Max Planck Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht 190], Heidelberg: Springer, p. 5 f. cf. Siedentop L. (2014) Inventing the individual. The origins of Western Liberalism, Allen Lane, p. 252 f.

  4. 4.

    Habermas J. (2006) Religion in the Public Sphere, European Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 14, p. 17.

  5. 5.

    The Committee produces an annual report to the Board of Governors which is then presented at the Commissioners’ Annual General Meeting (AGM) in June each year; at the time of writing this study, the relevant Report for 2013 was in preparation and was going to be made available after its presentation to the AGM in June, 2014.

  6. 6.

    The Church of England online Document Library: http://www.churchofengland.org/document-library. Accessed on March 31, 2014.

  7. 7.

    Nevertheless, according to Sørmoen O. (2009) Maintenance of churches in Norway, Conservation Bulletin, Vol. 61, pp. 26–7: “According to the Church Act (1996), the maintenance of the church should be funded by local government, a tradition going back over a century. The financial responsibility is therefore clear, although there are often insufficient funds to pay what is needed after the political priorities have been addressed. In practice the churches are underresourced. In fact there is, in many places, a considerable maintenance lag and an accelerating need for repairs”.

References

  • Blake, J. (2000). On defining the cultural heritage. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 49, 61–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English Heritage. (2010). Options for the disposal of redundant churches and other places of worship. London: Department for Media, Culture and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, G., & Ebert Schifferer, S. (Eds.). (2011). Sacred possessions: Collecting Italian religious art, 1500–1900. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckel, M. (1968). Staat, Kirche, Kunst: Rechtsfragen kirchlicher Kulturdenkmäler. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingar Mørk, M. (2006). Perspectives on the management of Church buildings in Norway today and in the future. In L. K. Morisset, L. Noppen, & T. Coomans (Eds.), Quel Avenir Pour Quelles Églises? What future for which churches? (pp. 441451). Montreal: Presses de Université du Québec à Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadish, S. (2009). Historic synagogues: Appreciation and challenges. Conservation Bulletin, 61, 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, K., & De La Hey, C. (1987). Churches. A question of conversion. London: Save Britain’s Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, C. (2006). New uses and new ownership in English historic churches. In L. K. Morisset, L. Noppen, & T. Coomans (Eds.), Quel Avenir Pour Quelles Églises? What future for which churches? (pp. 209222). Montreal: Presses de Université du Québec à Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tsivolas, T. (2014). Introduction. In: Law and Religious Cultural Heritage in Europe. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07932-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics