Skip to main content

Perception and Recall of Landmarks for Personal Navigation in Nature at Night Versus Day

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Abstract

Wayfinding at night in nature is challenging due to limited lighting and a low number of clearly identifiable landmarks. However, several activities in nature involve wayfinding at night, such as rescue services or hiking, but only a few human navigation studies have addressed these conditions. In the present study, we investigate the effects of night on the perception and recall of landmarks along a nature trail using the thinking-aloud and sketch map methods. The results reveal significant differences in the perception between day and night, which mainly originated from a restricted vista at night. In contrast, the landmark recall did not differ between day and night according to the sketch maps, which reflects uniform conceptualisation of the route in both times of day. The observed differences in the perception of landmarks may be applied to the adaptation of geospatial navigation applications that provide real-time wayfinding support, such as interactive maps and navigators, according to the day and night conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams CJ, Beaton RJ (2000) An investigation of navigation processes in human locomotor behavior. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annual Meet 44(26):233–236. doi:10.1177/154193120004402625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26(1):32–46. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson M, Braak CT (2003) Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance. J Stat Comput Simul 73(2):85–113. doi:10.1080/00949650215733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird S, Edward L, Klein E (2009) Natural language processing with Python. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol. http://nltk.org/book/. Accessed 26 Mar 2014

  • Boren MT, Ramey J (2000) Thinking aloud: reconciling theory and practice. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 43(3):261–278. doi:10.1109/47.867942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosset D, Claramunt C, Saux E (2008) Wayfinding in natural and urban environments: a comparative study. Cartographica 43(1):21–30. doi:10.3138/carto.43.1.21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caduff D, Timpf S (2008) On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation. Cogn Process 9(4):249–267. doi:10.1007/s10339-007-0199-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen R, Baldwin LM, Sherman RC (1978) Cognitive maps of a naturalistic setting. Child Dev 49(4):1216–1218. doi:10.2307/1128763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis M (1997) The description of routes: a cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Cahiers de psychologie cognitive 16(4):409–458. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1980) Verbal reports as data. Psychol Rev 87(3):215–251. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1998) How to study thinking in everyday life: contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind Cult Act 5(3):178–186. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0503_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier MS, Parush A, Macuda T, Tang D, Craig G, Jennings S (2008) The impact of night vision goggles on way-finding performance and the acquisition of spatial knowledge. Hum Factors 50(2):311–321. doi:10.1518/001872008X288295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty M, Richardson AE, Montello DR, Lovelace K, Subbiah I (2002) Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence 30(5):425–447. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00116-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heth C, Cornell EH (1998) Characteristics of travel by persons lost in Albertan wilderness areas. J Environ Psychol 18(3):223–235. doi:10.1006/jevp.1998.0093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill KA (2013) Wayfinding and spatial reorientation by Nova Scotia deer hunters. Environ Behav 45(2):267–282. doi:10.1177/0013916511420421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones E, Oliphant T, Peterson P et al (2001) SciPy: open source scientific tools for Python. http://www.scipy.org. Accessed 26 Mar 2014

  • Kaplan R (1976) Way-finding in the natural environment (chap 3). Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg, pp 46–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen P, Irvankoski K, Krause CM, Sarjakoski LT (2013) Landmarks in nature to support wayfinding: effects of seasons and experimental methods. Cogn Process 14(3):245–253. doi:10.1007/s10339-013-0538-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumagai JK, Tack DW (2005) Alternative display modalities in support of wayfinding. Technical report, Defence Research and Development Canada, Toronto. http://pubs.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc48/p524736.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2014

  • Lindén K, Silfverberg M, Pirinen T (2009) HFST tools for morphology—an efficient open-source package for construction of morphological analyzers. In: Mahlow C, Piotrowski M (eds) State of the art in computational morphology, communications in computer and information science, vol 41. Springer, Berlin, pp 28–47. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04131-0_3

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch K (1960) The image of the city. MIT, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeay H (2003) The relationship between bilingualism and the performance of spatial tasks. Int J Biling Educ Biling 6(6):423–438. doi:10.1080/13670050308667795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montello DR, Sullivan CN, Pick HLJ (1994) Recall memory for topographic maps and natural terrain: effects of experience and task performance. Cartographica 31(3):18–36. doi:10.3138/W806-5127-7W41-12H8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okabe A, Aoki K, Hamamoto W (1986) Distance and direction judgment in a large-scale natural environment: effects of a slope and winding trail. Environ Behav 18(6):755–772. doi:10.1177/0013916586186004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omodei MM, McLennan J (1994) Studying complex decision making in natural settings: using a head-mounted video camera to study competitive orienteering. Percept Mot Skills 79(3f):1411–1425. doi:10.2466/pms.1994.79.3f.1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pick HL, Heinrichs MR, Montello DR, Smith K, Sullivan CN, Thompson WB (1995) Topographic map reading. In: Hancock PA, Flach J, Caird J, Vicente K (eds) Local applications of the ecological approach to human-machine systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 255–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Presson CC, Montello DR (1988) Points of reference in spatial cognition: stalking the elusive landmark. Br J Dev Psychol 6(4):378–381. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.1988.tb01113.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 26 Mar 2014

  • Rehrl K, Leitinger S (2008) The SemWay skitouring experiment—how skitourers find their way. In: Gartner G, Leitinger S, Rehrl K (eds) Electronic proceedings of the 5th symposium on location based services, November, Salzburg, pp 64–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehrl K, Leitinger S, Gartner G, Ortag F (2009) An analysis of direction and motion concepts in verbal descriptions of route choices. In: Hornsby KS, Claramunt C, Denis M, Ligozat G (eds) COSIT 2009, LNCS, vol 5756. Springer, Berlin, pp 471–488. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03832-7_29

  • Rehrl K, Häusler E, Leitinger S (2010) Comparing the effectiveness of GPS-enhanced voice guidance for pedestrians with metric- and landmark-based instruction sets. In: Fabrikant S, Reichenbacher T, van Kreveld M, Schlieder C (eds) Geographic information science, LNCS, vol 6292. Springer, Berlin, pp 189–203. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15300-6_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sarjakoski LT, Kettunen P, Flink HM, Laakso M, Rӧnneberg M, Sarjakoski T (2012) Analysis of verbal route descriptions and landmarks for hiking. Pers and Ubiquitous Comput (Special Issue on Extreme Navigation) 16(8):1001–1011. doi:10.1007/s00779-011-0460-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarjakoski LT, Kettunen P, Halkosaari HM, Laakso M, Rӧnneberg M, Stigmar H, Sarjakoski T (2013) Landmarks and a hiking ontology to support wayfinding in a national park during different seasons. In: Raubal M, Frank AU, Mark DM (eds) Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space, LNGC. Springer, Berlin, pp 99–119. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34359-9_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smagorinsky P (1998) Thinking and speech and protocol analysis. Mind Cult Act 5(3):157–177. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0503_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Mark DM (2001) Geographical categories: an ontological investigation. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 15(7):591–612. doi:10.1080/13658810110061199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon C, Kray C (2009) Exploring the use of landmarks for mobile navigation support in natural environments. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, 15–18 September, Bonn. doi:10.1145/1613858.1613875 (article no. 13)

  • Steck SD, Mallot HA (2000) The role of global and local landmarks in virtual environment navigation. Presence 9(1):69–83. doi:10.1162/105474600566628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steidle A, Werth L, Hanke EV (2011) You can’t see much in the dark. Darkness affects construal level and psychological distance. Soc Psychol 42:174–184. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman EA (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev 55(4):189–208. doi:10.1037/h0061626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller D, Hunt E, Knapp D (1998) The transfer of spatial knowledge in virtual environment training. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 7(2):129–143. doi:10.1162/105474698565631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker LA, Cuqlock-Knopp G (1992) Navigation in off-road environments: orienteering interviews. Sci J Orienteering 8(2):55–71. http://orienteering.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Scientific-Journal-of-Orienteering-1992-Vol.82.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2014

  • Winter S, Raubal M, Nothegger C (2005) Focalizing measures of salience for wayfinding. In: Meng L, Reichenbacher T, Zipf A (eds) Map-based mobile services. Springer, Berlin, pp 125–139. doi:10.1007/3-540-26982-7_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This survey is part of the research project “Ubiquitous Spatial Communication” (UbiMap) in 2009–2012. The UbiMap project was funded by the Academy of Finland (MOTIVE programme) and was carried out in cooperation with the Finnish Geodetic Institute (FGI), Department of Geoinformatics and Cartography and the University of Helsinki, Cognitive Science. The third-party funding sources did not affect the design or conduct of the study. The authors want to thank all the participants for taking part in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pyry Kettunen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kettunen, P., Putto, K., Gyselinck, V., Krause, C.M., Sarjakoski, L.T. (2015). Perception and Recall of Landmarks for Personal Navigation in Nature at Night Versus Day. In: Brus, J., Vondrakova, A., Vozenilek, V. (eds) Modern Trends in Cartography. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07926-4_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics