Skip to main content

Auditing of Information Technology Controls in Outsourcing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems, Management, Organization and Control

Abstract

The paper analyzes the level of Information Technology (IT) and the quality of IT Controls (ITC) in outsourcing. We collected data through a questionnaire sent to a sample of Italian listed companies and performed robustness tests. Our results show that in Italy: (1) IT in outsourcing is widespread; (2) ITC in outsourcing complies with USA frameworks. ITC mainly follow the Statement of Auditing Standard No. 70 (SAS 70) Report Types 1 and 2. Concerns about quality are related to the absence of a direct evaluation in outsourcer location and the absence of audit provisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Altinkemer, K., Chaturvedi, A., Gulati, R.: Information systems outsourcing: issues and evidence. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 14(4), 252–278 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Loh, L., Venkatraman, N.: Determinants of information technology outsourcing: a cross-sectional analysis. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 9(1), 7–24 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hall, J.A., Liedtka, S.L.: Financial performance, CEO compensation, and large-scale information technology outsourcing decisions. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 193–221 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cannon, D.M., Growe, G.A.: How does Sarbanes-Oxley affect outsouring? J. Corp. Account. Financ. 16(3), 13–20 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. PCAOB—Public Company accounting oversight board: auditing standard n.5, Un audit of internal control over financial reporting that is integrated with an audit of financial statements. PCAOB, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. SEC—Securities and exchange commission: release nos. 33-8810. 34-55929, FR-77, File S7-24-06, commission guidance regarding management’s report on internal control over financial reporting under part 13(a) or 15(d) of the securities exchange act of 1934. SEC, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. COSO—Committee of sponsoring organizations of the treadway commission: guidance for smaller public companies reporting on internal controls over financial reporting. COSO, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. IT Governance Institute: COBIT. Control objectives for information and related technology 4.1. IT Governance Institute (ITGI), USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. IT Governance Institute: COBIT for SOX. IT Control Objectives for Sarbanes-Oxley: The Role of IT in the design and implementation of internal control over financial reporting, 2nd edn. IT Governance Institute, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. AICPA—American Institute of Certified Public Accountants: Statement on Auditing Standard 70 (SAS70). AICPA, USA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Denyer, C.: Understanding the Dynamics of SAS 70. Audits Benefits Compens. Digest. 43(8), 11–15 (2006b)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Laurent, W.: Outsourcing governance. Data Min Rev Mag. 16(10), 14 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffman, T.: Sarbanes-Oxley mandates lead to IT certification push. Computrworld 37(44), 14 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCann, D.: The truth about SAS70. CFO 26(7), 27–29 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCollum, T.: A Fix for SAS70 Abuse. Intern. Auditor 67(5), 13–14 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gazzaway, T.: SAS 70 new life for an old audit standard. Financ. Executive. 20(3), 43–44 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bednarz, A.: Offsite security complicates compliance. Netw. World 22(11), 27–28 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Denyer, C.: Attention benefit managers: if you’re outsourcing HR/benefit functions, you need to know about SAS 70 audits. Employee Benefit News, 20(8), 14 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Germano, L., Baker, A.: Why an SAS70 review will benefit your organization. J. Pension Benefits Issues Adm. 11(1), 69–73 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stanton, L.: Why your organization might need a SAS70 report. 401K Advisor 11(4), 8–9 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nickell, C.G., Denyer, C.: An Introduction to SAS70. Audits Benefits Law J. 20(1), 58–68 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rustagi, S., King, W., Kirsch, L. J.: Predictors of formal control usage in IT outsourcing partnerships. Inf. Syst. Res. 19(2), 126–143 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barthélemy, J.: The hidden cost of IT outsourcing. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 42(3), 60–69 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Azzali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mazza, T., Azzali, S., Fornaciari, L. (2014). Auditing of Information Technology Controls in Outsourcing. In: Baglieri, D., Metallo, C., Rossignoli, C., Pezzillo Iacono, M. (eds) Information Systems, Management, Organization and Control. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07905-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics