Skip to main content

The Role of IS in Performance Management: The Case of an Italian Public University

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems, Management, Organization and Control

Abstract

The article investigates the relationship between Performance Management Systems (PMS) and IS in a single Italian Public University, starting from the gap that exists between what is declared in University policy statements—ostensibly oriented towards empowerment—and what is actually implemented by public managers. We are particularly interested in understanding how ICT could support PMS in the control process. In our empirical analysis we observed that the role of IS depends on the strategy adopted in planning and implementing the PMS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Borgonovi, E.: Il Diritto Dovere di Valutare e Premiare il Merito nelle Amministrazioni Pubbliche. Azienda Pubblica 22(2), 199–204 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Riege, A., Lindsay, N.: Knowledge management in the public sector: stakeholder partnerships in the public policy development. J. Knowl. Manage. 10(3), 24–39 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Minelli, E., Rebora, G., Turri, M.: Waiting for the market: where is the Italian university System heading? High. Educ. Policy 25, 131–145 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hellström, T., Husted, K.: Mapping knowledge and intellectual capital in academic environments: a focus group study. J. Intellect. Capital 5(1), 165–180 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hood, C.: A public management for all seasons? Public Adm. 69, 3–19 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vienažindiene, M., Ciarniene, R.: New public management: theoretical and practical aspects. Eng. Econ. 5, 44–50 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Bruijn, H.: Performance measurement in the public sector: strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement. Int. J. Public Sector Manag. 15(7), 578–594 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rainey, H.G.: Reform trends at the federal level with implications for the states: the pursuit of flexibility and the human capital movement. In: Kellough, J.E., Nigro, L.G. (eds.) Civil Service Reform in the States: Personnel Policies and Politics at the Sub-national Level. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 33–58 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heinrich, C.J.: Do government bureaucrats make effective use of performance management information? J. Public Adm. Res. Theor. 9(3), 363–393 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Radin, B.A.: The government performance and results act and the tradition of federal management reform: square pegs in round holes. J. Public Adm. Res. Theor. 10(1), 1–35 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moynihan, D.P.: The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Georgetown University Press, Washington (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heinrich, C.J., Marschke, G.: Incentives and their dynamics in public sector performance management systems. J. Policy Anal. Manage. 29(1), 183–208 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cavalluzzo, K.S., Ittner, C.D.: Implementing performance measurement innovations: evidence from government. Acc. Organ. Soc. 29(3–4), 243–267 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Broadbent, J., Laughlin, R.: Performance management systems: a conceptual model. Manage. Acc. Res. 20, 283–295 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Corcoles, Y.R., Penalver, J.F.S., Ponce, A.T.: Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: stakeholders’ information needs. J. Intellect. Capital 12(3), 356–376 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sánchez, M.P., Elena, S., Castrillo, R.: Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model. J. Intellect. Capital 10(2), 307–324 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Minelli, E., Rebora, G., Turri, M.: The risk of failure of controls and levers of change: an examination of two Italian public sector. J. Acc. Organ. Change 4(1), 5–26 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Secundo, G., Margherita, A., Elia, G., Passiante, G.: Intangible assets in higher education and research: mission, performance or both? J. Intellect. Capital 11(2), 140–157 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Neely, A.D., Gregory, M.J., Platts, K.: Performance measurement system design: a literature Review and research agenda. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 15(4), 80–116 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Otley, D.: Performance management: a framework for management control systems research. Manage. Acc. Res. 10(4), 363–382 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gruman, J.A., Saks, A.M.: Performance management and employee engagement. Hum. Resour. Manage. Rev. 21(2), 123–136 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cardy, R.L.: Performance Management: Concepts, Skills, and Exercises. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Aguinis, H.: Performance Management, 2nd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fitzgerald, L., Moon, P.: Performance Measurement in Service Industries: Making It Work. CIMA, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ferreira, A., Otley, D.: The design and use of performance management systems: an extended framework for analysis. Manage. Acc. Res. 20(4), 263–282 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Canonico, P., Söderlund, P.: Getting control of multi-project organizations: combining contingent control mechanisms. Int. J. Project Manage. 28, 796–806 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Doolin, B., McLeod, L.: Towards critical interpretivism in IS research. In: Howcroft, D., Trauth, E.M. (eds.) Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory and Application, pp. 244–271. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Klein, H.K., Brooke, C.: Exploring the critical research agenda in information Systems research. Inf. Syst. J. 18(2), 123–135 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Howcroft, D.: Information System. In: Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., Willmott, H. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bednar, P.M.: A contextual integration of individual and organizational learning perspectives as part of IS analysis. Inf. Sci. J. 3(3), 145–156 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  31. McLoughlin, I., Harris, M.: Innovation, Organizational Change and Technology. International Thompson Business Paper, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: Basic assumptions of the critical research perspectives in information systems. In: Howcroft, D., Trauth, E. (eds.) Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory and Application, pp. 19–46. Aldershot, Edward Elgar (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Avgerou, C., Mansell, R., Quah, D., Silverstone, R.: The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Berger, P.L., Luckmann, T.: The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Weick, K.E.: Enactment processes in organizations. In: Staw, B.M., Salancick, G.R. (eds.) New Directions in Organizational Behaviour. St. Clair Press, Chicago (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Giddens, A.: Modernity and Self Identity, Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Polity Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sveningsson, S., Alvesson, M.: Managing managerial identities: organizational fragmentation. Discourse and identity struggle. Hum. Relat. 56(10), 1141–1193 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Alvesson, M., Willmott, H.: Identity regulation as organizational control: producing the appropriate individual. J. Manage. Stud. 39, 619–644 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Alvesson, M., Willmott, H.: On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Acad. Manag. Rev. 17(3), 432–464 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Brooke, C.: Critical research in information systems. J. Inf. Technol. 17(2), 45–47 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Martinez, M., Pezzillo Iacono, M.: Dealing with critical IS research: artifacts, drifts, electronic panopticon and illusions of empowerment. In: Baskerville, R., De Marco, M., Spagnoletti, P. (eds.) Designing Organisational Systems—An Interdisciplinary Discourse, Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ciborra, C.U.: A Critical Review of the Literature on the Management of Corporate Information Infrastructure. In: Ciborra, C.U. (ed.) From Control to Drift: the Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures, pp. 15–40. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ciborra, C.U.: The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rajao, R., Hayes, N.: Conceptions of control and IT artefacts: an institutional account of the Amazon rainforest monitoring system. J. Inf. Technol. 24(4), 320–331 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fligstein, N.: The Transformation of Corporate Control. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Martinez, M.: ICT, Productivity and organizational complementarity. In: Rossignoli, C., Carugati, A. (eds.) Emerging Themes in Information Systems and Organization Studies, pp. 271–281 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Introna, L.D.: Management, Information and Power. Macmillan, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Orlikowski, W.J.: Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4), 404–428 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. OECD: Modernising the public administration: A Study on Italy. Presented at public governance committee meeting at the ministerial level, Venice, 15–16 Nov 2010

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hunt, D.P.: The concept of knowledge and how to measure it. J. Intellect. Capital 4(1), 125–142 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Boyer, E.: Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Carnegie Foundation, Princeton (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Pezzillo Iacono .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mercurio, R., De Nito, E., Pezzillo Iacono, M., Esposito, V., Silvestri, L. (2014). The Role of IS in Performance Management: The Case of an Italian Public University. In: Baglieri, D., Metallo, C., Rossignoli, C., Pezzillo Iacono, M. (eds) Information Systems, Management, Organization and Control. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07905-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics