Abstract
The detection of breast cancer relies on high-quality images from digital mammography. Optimal levels of compression force are unknown, and UK national guidelines recommend forces of less than 200N. However, large variations in compression forces exist and may be influenced by the mammography practitioner and the breast size and pain threshold of the patient. This study examined the relationship between breast density and compression force. Women attending for routine breast screening and who had a mammogram taken by the same practitioner on the same equipment were included in the study (n=211). Volumetric density measurements were obtained using VolparaTM and details on imaging parameters were obtained from the DICOM headers. There was a strong, positive correlation between compression force and fibroglandular tissue. There was also evidence of a significant positive association between compression force and breast volume which was independent of the volume of fibroglandular tissue present.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Mercer, C.E., Hogg, P., Lawson, R., et al.: Practitioner compression force variability in mammography: a preliminary study. Br. J. Radiol. (2013), doi:10.1259/bjr.20110596
National Quality Assurance Coordinating Group for Radiography. Quality Assurance Guidelines for Mammography Including Radiographic Quality. NHSBSP Publication No 63 (April 2006)
Huang, Z., Hankinson, S.E., Colditz, G.A., et al.: Dual Effects of Weight and Weight Gain on Breast Cancer Risk. JAMA 278(17), 1407–1411 (1997)
Wolfe, J.N.: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol. 126, 1130–1139 (1976)
McCormack, V.A., Silva, D.S.: Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: a Meta-Analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 15(6), 1159–1169 (2006)
Assi, V., Warwick, J., Cuzick, J., Duffy, S.W.: Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density. Nat. Rev. Clin Oncol. 9, 33–40 (2012), doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.173.
Dustler, M., Anderson, I., Brorson, H., et al.: Breast Compression in mammography: pressure distribution patterns. Acta. Radiol. 53, 973–980 (2012)
Evans, G.: PROCAS study (2011), http://www.uhsm.nhs.uk/research/Pages/PROCASstudy.aspx (June 16, 2013)
Volpara Density (2013), http://www.volparadensity.com/
Poulos, A., McLean, D., Rickard, M., et al.: Breast Compression in Mammography: how much is enough? Australian Radiology 47, 121–126 (2003)
Helvie, M.A., Chan, H.P., Adler, D.D., Boyd, P.G.: Breast Thickness in Routine Mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose. American J. of Roentgenology 163, 1371–1374 (1994)
Nelson, H.D., Tyne, K., Naik, A., et al.: Screening for Breast Cancer: an update for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann. Intern. Med. 151(10), 727–737 (2009)
Ronckers, C.M., Erdman, C.A., Land, C.E.: Radiation and Breast Cancer: A Review of Current Evidence. Breast Cancer Res. 7(1), 21–32 (2005)
Nimmo, L.J., Alston, L.A.C., McFayden, A.: The Influence of HRT on Technical Recall on the UK Breast Screening Programme: are pain, compression force, and compressed breast thickness contributing factors? Clinical Radiology 62, 439–446 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Khan-Perez, J. et al. (2014). Volumetric Breast Density and Radiographic Parameters. In: Fujita, H., Hara, T., Muramatsu, C. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8539. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_38
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07886-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07887-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)