Skip to main content

Volumetric Breast Density and Radiographic Parameters

  • Conference paper
Breast Imaging (IWDM 2014)

Abstract

The detection of breast cancer relies on high-quality images from digital mammography. Optimal levels of compression force are unknown, and UK national guidelines recommend forces of less than 200N. However, large variations in compression forces exist and may be influenced by the mammography practitioner and the breast size and pain threshold of the patient. This study examined the relationship between breast density and compression force. Women attending for routine breast screening and who had a mammogram taken by the same practitioner on the same equipment were included in the study (n=211). Volumetric density measurements were obtained using VolparaTM and details on imaging parameters were obtained from the DICOM headers. There was a strong, positive correlation between compression force and fibroglandular tissue. There was also evidence of a significant positive association between compression force and breast volume which was independent of the volume of fibroglandular tissue present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mercer, C.E., Hogg, P., Lawson, R., et al.: Practitioner compression force variability in mammography: a preliminary study. Br. J. Radiol. (2013), doi:10.1259/bjr.20110596

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Quality Assurance Coordinating Group for Radiography. Quality Assurance Guidelines for Mammography Including Radiographic Quality. NHSBSP Publication No 63 (April 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huang, Z., Hankinson, S.E., Colditz, G.A., et al.: Dual Effects of Weight and Weight Gain on Breast Cancer Risk. JAMA 278(17), 1407–1411 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolfe, J.N.: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol. 126, 1130–1139 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McCormack, V.A., Silva, D.S.: Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: a Meta-Analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 15(6), 1159–1169 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Assi, V., Warwick, J., Cuzick, J., Duffy, S.W.: Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density. Nat. Rev. Clin Oncol. 9, 33–40 (2012), doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dustler, M., Anderson, I., Brorson, H., et al.: Breast Compression in mammography: pressure distribution patterns. Acta. Radiol. 53, 973–980 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Evans, G.: PROCAS study (2011), http://www.uhsm.nhs.uk/research/Pages/PROCASstudy.aspx (June 16, 2013)

  9. Volpara Density (2013), http://www.volparadensity.com/

  10. Poulos, A., McLean, D., Rickard, M., et al.: Breast Compression in Mammography: how much is enough? Australian Radiology 47, 121–126 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Helvie, M.A., Chan, H.P., Adler, D.D., Boyd, P.G.: Breast Thickness in Routine Mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose. American J. of Roentgenology 163, 1371–1374 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nelson, H.D., Tyne, K., Naik, A., et al.: Screening for Breast Cancer: an update for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann. Intern. Med. 151(10), 727–737 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ronckers, C.M., Erdman, C.A., Land, C.E.: Radiation and Breast Cancer: A Review of Current Evidence. Breast Cancer Res. 7(1), 21–32 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nimmo, L.J., Alston, L.A.C., McFayden, A.: The Influence of HRT on Technical Recall on the UK Breast Screening Programme: are pain, compression force, and compressed breast thickness contributing factors? Clinical Radiology 62, 439–446 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khan-Perez, J. et al. (2014). Volumetric Breast Density and Radiographic Parameters. In: Fujita, H., Hara, T., Muramatsu, C. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8539. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07886-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07887-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics