Skip to main content

Comparison of SNDR, NPWE Model and Human Observer Results for Spherical Densities and Microcalcifications in Real Patient Backgrounds for 2D Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis

  • Conference paper
Book cover Breast Imaging (IWDM 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 8539))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The development of objective detection performance measures is of great value for both optimization purposes and inter-comparison of different mammographic (2D) or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems. They would be valuable as an alternative for human observer studies. In this study, we have calculated contrast (C), signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) and a NPWE model observer (dā€™) for spherical densities and microcalcifications in patient 2D and DBT images. Contrast was higher in 2D compared to DBT reconstructions. In contrary, SDNR values were higher in DBT for the spheres and were comparable between 2D and DBT for the microcalcifications. A comparison between dā€™ and SDNR showed a strong correlation between these two measures for both spheres and microcalcifications in 2D and DBT. Only weak and moderate correlations were found for SDNR and dā€™ versus human confidence scores, indicating that there is room for improvement for the NPWE model observer as a theoretical predictor of human detection performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rafferty, E.A., Park, J.M., Philpotts, L.E., et al.: Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. RadiologyĀ 266(1), 104ā€“113 (2013)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Jacobs, J., Marshall, N. W., Cockmartin, L., et al.: Towards an international consensus strategy for periodic quality control of digital breast tomosynthesis systems. In: SPIE Proc. vol. 7622, pp. 7622ā€“15 (2010)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Cockmartin, L., Stalmans, D., Zanca, F., et al.: A new hybrid technical-clinical test demonstrates improved low contrast detectability in tomosynthesis when compared to 2D mammography. RSNA (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Cockmartin, L., Aerts, G., Zanca, F., et al.: Comparison of microcalcification detection in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis using a hybrid technical-clinical test method. RSNA (2013)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Kelly, D.H.: Motion and vision. II Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface. J. Opt. Soc. Am.Ā 69(10), 1340ā€“1349 (1979)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Hu, Y.-H., Zhao, W.: The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis. Med. Phys.Ā 38(5), 2455ā€“2466 (2011)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Monnin, P., Marshall, N.W., Bosmans, H., et al.: Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part II. NPWE as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis. Phys. Med. Biol.Ā 56, 4221ā€“4238 (2011)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Salvagnini, E., Bosmans, H., Monnin, P., et al.: The use of detectability indices as a means of automatic exposure control for a digital mammography system. In: Proceedings of SPIE (2011)

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cockmartin, L., Marshall, N.W., Bosmans, H. (2014). Comparison of SNDR, NPWE Model and Human Observer Results for Spherical Densities and Microcalcifications in Real Patient Backgrounds for 2D Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis. In: Fujita, H., Hara, T., Muramatsu, C. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8539. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07886-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07887-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics