Communication Issues

  • William P. O’HareEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research book series (BRIEFSWELLBEING)


The importance of communication in data-based child advocacy is described. The roles of data experts and communication experts are examined. The importance of mass media is explored. Key differences between the approach of data experts and communication experts are provided. Some of the most problematic aspects of data experts and communication experts working together are examined.


Communication Mass media Newspapers Communication norms Public audiences Internet 


  1. Anderson, A., & Harbridge, L. (2013). The policy consequences of motivated information processing among partisan elite, working paper series, WP-13-02, Evanston, IL: Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  2. Association of Public Opinion Researchers. (2013). Polling and Democracy: Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Public Opinion and Leadership.Google Scholar
  3. Axford,N., Hobbs, T. & Jodrell, D. (2013). Making child well-being data work hard: Getting from data to policy and practice, Child Indicators Research, 6(1), 161–178.Google Scholar
  4. Children Now. (2003). Children now media alert, May 13, 2003, Oakland, CA: Children Now.Google Scholar
  5. Barabas, J., & Jerit, J. (2009). Estimating the causal effects of media coverage on policy-specific knowledge. American Journal of Policy Science, 53(1), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg, P. H. (2013). Influence: Essential for success as a statistician. AMSTAT News, The Membership Magazine of the American Statistical Association, Issue # 435, September.Google Scholar
  7. Carter, C. (2014). News media and child well-being. In:A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frones & J. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, B. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Congressional Management Foundation. (2011). Communicating with congress: Perceptions of citizens advocacy on capitol hill. Washington, DC: Congressional Management Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Dunn, W., & Holzer, B. (1988). Knowledge in society: Anatomy of an emergent field. Knowledge in Society, 6, 6–26.Google Scholar
  11. Giovanninni, E. (2008). The role of communication in transforming statistics into knowledge, organisation for economic co-operation and development, paper presented at the conference innovative approaches to turning statistics into knowledge. Sweden May: Stockholm. 2008.Google Scholar
  12. Gormley, W. T. (2012). Voices for children: Rhetoric and public policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  13. Guzman, L., Lippman, L., Moore, K. A. O’Hare, W. P. (2009). Accentuating the negative: The mismatch between public perception of child well-being and official statistics. Child Indicator Research, 2, (4), 391–416.Google Scholar
  14. Haaga, J. (2003). Why Didn’t You Write What I Thought I Said? Paper delivered at the Population Association of America Conference, May.Google Scholar
  15. Hutchinson, J. (1995). A multimethod analysis of knowledge use in social policy. Science Communication, 17(1), 90–106.Google Scholar
  16. Inter-American Development Bank. (2008). Beyond the facts: Understanding quality of life, ideas for development in the Americas (Vol. 17). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  17. Jack, S., & Tonmyr, L. (2008). Knowledge transfer and exchange: Disseminating canadian child maltreatment surveillance findings to decision makers. Child Indicators Research, 1(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jakens, F. (2008). Media Stereotypes are alienating a whole generation argues Felix Jakens, Compass; direction for the democratic left.
  19. Kellogg Foundation. (No date). The challenge of informing all state policy Makers. From a Presentation at Michigan State University in October 1998, Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, MI.Google Scholar
  20. King, R. (2014). A life in statistics. Significance, 11(1), 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kunkel, D., Smith, S., Suding,P. & Biely, E. (2002). Coverage in context: How thouroughly the news media report five key children’s issues, Study Commissioned by the Casey Journalism Center on Children and Families, Philip Merrill College of Journalism. MD: University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
  22. Leibovitz, H. (2007). Dissemination lessons learned. Assessing the new federalism. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from
  23. Lester, J. P. (1993). The utilization of policy analysis by state agency officials. Knowledge Creation, Diffusion and Utilization, 14(3), 267–290.Google Scholar
  24. Li, J. (2011). Child Indicators: Lost in Translation, presentation at the International Society for Child Indicators Conference, York, England. Retrieved online from.
  25. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw D. L. (1972). Agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 2.Google Scholar
  26. McCombs, M. E (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 13. 2.Google Scholar
  27. McNutt, J. G. (2007). Adoption of new wave electronic advocacy techniques by nonprofit child advocacy organizations. In M. Cortes & K. Rafter (Eds.), Nonprofits and technology: Emerging research for usable knowledge. Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.Google Scholar
  28. National Conference of State Legislators. (2004). State legislators’ perceptions of KIDS COUNT, National Conference of States Legislators, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  29. O’Hare, W. P. (2003). Perceptions and misperceptions of America’s children: The role of print media, KIDS COUNT Working Paper, The Annie E. Casey Foundation, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  30. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2008). Global project on measuring the progress of society towards a strategic action plan. Paris, France: STD/CSTAT, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  31. Starbuck, R. (2013). Communicating with clients AMSTAT NEWS, Issue 437, November, pp 25–26.Google Scholar
  32. State Legislative Leaders Foundation. (1995). State legislative leaders: Keys to effective legislation for children and families, a report. Centerville, MA: State Legislative Leaders Foundation.Google Scholar
  33. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2003). Data-based advocacy. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.Google Scholar
  34. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2007). Summary of research findings: Awareness, use and perceptions of KIDS COUNT among congressional staff. Retrieved from{D92C23CA-7982-47C6-B74A-05464CF09057}.
  35. The Public Agenda. (1997). Kids these days: What Americans really think about the next generation. New York: The Public Agenda.Google Scholar
  36. Yu, R. (2014). Data-Driven Journalism Soars. USA Today, 17, 4b.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Annie E. Casey FoundationBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations