Types of Advocacy Activity Using Child Indicators

  • William P. O’HareEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research book series (BRIEFSWELLBEING)


Six different kinds of activities that fall under the data-based child advocacy conceptual framework are described and several examples are provided for each type. Data is provided to document the growing use of the data-based child advocacy approach around the world over the past few decades. The wide variety of circumstances and contexts where data-based child advocacy is being used is described.


Public awareness Reports on children United Nations Annie E. Casey Foundation Millennium development goals Monitoring Evaluation 


  1. America’s Promise (2013). Building a Grad Nation Report: Progress and challenge in ending the High School Dropout Epidemic.
  2. Andrews, B. (2008). Foreword in State of the Nations Children: Ireland 2008. Ireland: Office of the Minister for Children and Youth. Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Arieh, A., Kaufman, N. H., Andrews, A. B., Goerge, R. M., Lee, B. J., & Aber, J. L. (2001). Measuring and monitoring children’s well-being. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer. Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Arieh, A. (2006). Measuring and monitoring the well-being of young children around the world.In Paper Commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2007, Strong Foundations: Early Childhood Care and Education. Google Scholar
  5. Ben-Arieh, A., & Frones, I. (Eds.). (2009). Indicators of children’s well-being: Theory and practice in a multi-cultural perspective. New York: Springer. Google Scholar
  6. Ben-Arieh, A., & Goerge, R. M. (Eds.). (2006). Indicators of children’s well-being. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. Google Scholar
  7. Ben-Arieh, A., & Gross-Manos, D. (2009). Taxonomy for child well-being indicators. In Presentation at the 3 rd Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Forum on “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy: Charting Progress, Building Visions, and Improving Life. Busan Korea, Oct 27–30. Google Scholar
  8. Belsky, J., et al. (2006). Effects of sure start local programmes on children and families: Early findings from a quasi-experimental cross sectional study. British Medical Journal, 332, 1476–1482. Google Scholar
  9. Bernal, R. (2008). The effect of maternal employment and child care on child cognitive development. International Economic Review, 49(4), 1173. Google Scholar
  10. Bradburn, N. M., & Fuqua, C. J. E. (2010). Indicators and the federal statistical system: An essential but fraught partnership. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 631, 89–108. Special editor Kenneth Prewitt. Google Scholar
  11. -Bradshaw, J., & Richardson, D. (2009). An index of child well-being in Europe. Child Indicators Research, 2(3), 319–351. Google Scholar
  12. Bradshaw, J. (2014). Overview: Social policies and child well-being. In A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frones & J. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being. New York: Springer Publisher. Google Scholar
  13. Brown, B. V., & Botsko, C. (1996). A guide to state and local -level indicators of child well-being available through the federal statistical system, Paper prepared for The Annie E. Casey Foundation, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, B., & Corbett, T. (1997). Social indicators and public policy in the age of devolution. Special Report No. 71. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Institute for Research on Poverty. Google Scholar
  15. Brown, B. V., Smith, B., & Harper, M. (2002). International Surveys of Child and Family Well-Being: An Overview. Child Trends, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, B.V. ed. ( 2008). Key Indicators of Child and Youth Well-Being: Completing the Picture, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown, B., & Moore, K. A. (2009). What get measured get done: High priority opportunities to improve our nation’s capacity to monitor child and youth well-being. Child Trends, Washington, DC: Paper prepared for the Annie E. Casey Foundation. Google Scholar
  18. Campaign for United States Ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (2014). Information available on their website at
  19. Center for Education Policy. (2011). State test score trends through 2008–2009: Progress lags in high school, especially for advanced achievers. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy. Google Scholar
  20. Children’s Institute, Berry, L., Biersteker, L., Dawes, A, Lake, L., & Smith C. (2013). South african child gauge. Cape Town: University of Cape Town. Available at
  21. Child Trends (2011). Handout at the October 17, 2011. Washington, DC: Meeting of the Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics Meeting.Google Scholar
  22. Cohen, P. N. (1998).State policies, spending, and kids count indicators of child well-being. Washington, DC: Unpublished Paper by the Population Reference Bureau. Google Scholar
  23. Corbett, T. J. (2008). Social indicators as a policy tool: welfare reform as a case study. In B. V. Brown (Ed.), Key indicators of child and youth well-being: Completing the picture. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  24. Department of Health and Children (2000). Our chidlren- their lives: The national children's strategy, The Stationery Office, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
  25. Doek, J. E. (2014). Child well-being; children’s rights perspective. In A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frones, & J. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being. New York: Springer Publisher.Google Scholar
  26. Eurochild (2009). What are the latest policy developments at EU level. Eurochild Policy Briefing No. 5, November, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  27. Every Child Matters Education Fund (2008). Geography Matters: Child Well-Being in the States, Every Child Matters Education Fund, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  28. Focus, First. (2013). Children’s budget 2013. Washington, DC: First Focus. Google Scholar
  29. Foundation for Child Development.(2013). 2013 child and youth well-being index (CWI). Foundation for Child Development, New York. Available at
  30. Groves, R. M. (2010). The structure and activities of the United STATES federal statistical system: History and recurrent challenges. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 631, 163–179. Special editor Kenneth Prewitt. Google Scholar
  31. Harknett, K., Garfinkel, I., Bainbridge, J., Smeeding, T., Folbre, N., McLanahan, S. (2003). Do public expenditures improve child outcomes in the U.S.: A comparison across 50 states, Princeton, NJ. Center for Research on Child Well-Being, Princeton University Working Paper 03-02.Google Scholar
  32. Hood, S. (2006). Reporting on children’s well-being: The state of London’s children reports. Social Indicators Research, 80, 249–264. Google Scholar
  33. Isaacs, J., Edelstein, S., Hahn, H., Toran, K., & Steurele, C. E. (2013). Kids share 2013: Federal expenditures on children in 2012 and future projections. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Google Scholar
  34. Israel National Council for the Child Report (2007). The State of the Child in Israel 2007: A Statistical Abstract. Available at
  35. Jack, S., & Tonmyr, L. (2008). Knowledge transfer and exchange: Disseminating Canadian child maltreatment surveillance findings to decision makers. Child Indicators Research, 1(1), 51–64. Google Scholar
  36. Kilbourne, S. (1998). Opposition to United STATES Ratification of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child: Responses to parental rights arguments. Poverty Law Journal, 4, 56–112. Google Scholar
  37. Lamb, V. & W.P. O’Hare (2013). Scalability of the CWI: State-level indicators and composite indices. In chapter 7 in the Well-Being of America’s Children: Developing and Improving the Child and Youth Well-Being Index, Editor Kenneth C. Land. Google Scholar
  38. Land, K. C., Lamb, V. L., & Mustillo, S. K. (2001). Child and youth well-being in the United States, 1975-1998: Some findings from a new index. Social Indicators Research, 56, 241–320. Google Scholar
  39. Lewis, K., & Burd-Sharp, S. (2010). The measure of America 2010-2011: Mapping risks and resilience. New York, NY: New York University Press. Google Scholar
  40. McCroskey, J. (2008). Using child and family indicators to influence communities and policy in Los Angeles County. In A., Ben-Arieh, & I. Frones (Eds.) (2009), Indicators of children’s well-being: Theory and practice in a multi-cultural perspective (pp. 501–148). New York: Springer. Google Scholar
  41. Mekonen, Y. (2010). Measuring Government performance in realizing child rights and child well-being: The approach and the indicators. Child Indicators Research, 3(2), 205–242. Google Scholar
  42. National Conference of State Legislators (2004) . State Legislators’ Perceptions of KIDS COUNT, National Conference of States Legislators, Denver, CO. Google Scholar
  43. O’Hare, W. P., & Pollard, K. (1998). How accurate are state-level estimates from the current population survey? Population Research and Policy Review, 17(1), 21–36. Google Scholar
  44. O’Hare, W. P, & Lee, M. (2007). Factors Affecting State Differences in Child Well-Being, KIDS COUNT Working Paper, The Annie E. Casey Foundation, Baltimore, MD. Available online at
  45. O’Hare, W. P. (2008). Measuring the impact of child indicators. Child Indicator Research, 1(4), 387–396, Springer. Google Scholar
  46. O’Hare, W. P. (2012a). Development of the child indicator movement in the United States. Child Development Perspectives, 6(1), 79–84. Google Scholar
  47. O’Hare, W. P. (2012b). The Undercount of Children in the 2010 Census and Its Implications. Paper Presented at the 2012 American Statistical Association Conference, San Diego CA. Google Scholar
  48. O’Hare, W. P., Mather, M., Dupuis, G., Land, K. C., Lamb, V. I., & Fu, Q. (2013). Analyzing difference in child well-being among U.S . States. Child Indicators Research, 6(2), 401–431. Google Scholar
  49. O’Hare, W. P., Riche, M., F., & Lippman, L. (2013) Development of the U.S. federal interagency forum on child and family statistics. In Presentation at the 4th International Society for Child Indicators Conference, Seoul, Korea. Available online at
  50. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2009) Doing better for children, Chapter 2. Paris, France: Comparative Child Well-Being Across the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Google Scholar
  51. Orzag, P. (2010). Federal statistics and the policy making process. In The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (Vol. 631). Special editor Kenneth Prewitt. Google Scholar
  52. Pollard, E. I., & Lee, P. D. (2003). Child well-being: A systematic review of the literature. Social Indicators Research, 61, 59–78. Google Scholar
  53. Portwood, S. G. J, Shears, K., Eichelberer, C. N., & Abrams L. P. (2010). An institute for social capital: Enhancing community capacity through data sharing. Child Indicators Research, 3(2), 261–273. Google Scholar
  54. Price, M. (2009). Foreward in South African Child Gauge 2008/2009, Children’s Institute (p. 6). South Africa: University of Cape Town. Google Scholar
  55. Red Por Los Derechos de la Infancia (2010). La Infancia Cuenta, Red Por Los Derechos de la Infancia. Mexico City, Mexico. Available at
  56. Ritualo, A., & O’Hare, W. P. (2000). Factors related to state differences in child well-being. In Paper Presented at the Southern Demographic Association Conference.Google Scholar
  57. Rose, W., & Rowlands, J. (2010). Introducing the concept of child well-being into government policy. In C. McAuley & W. Rose (Eds.), Child well-being: Understanding children’s Lives. London: Jessica Kinglsey, Publishers. Google Scholar
  58. Save the Children UK. (2012). The Child Development Index: Holding Government to Account for Children’s Wellbeing. Save the Children UK, London. Available at
  59. Stagner, M., Goerge, R. M., & Ballard, P. (2008). Improved indicators of child well-being. Chicago: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago. Google Scholar
  60. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2005a). County officials’ perceptions and use of KIDS COUNT. Available at{24D4E23B-A2E1-4428-88A1-85B3B0AB15B1}.
  61. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2005b). Business leaders’ perceptions of KIDS COUNT. Available at
  62. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2005c). Summary of research findings: State legislative leaders’ perceptions of KIDS COUNT. Available at
  63. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2007). Summary of research findings: Awareness, use and perceptions of KIDS COUNT among congressional staff. Available at{D92C23CA-7982-47C6-B74A-05464CF09057}.
  64. The Annie E. Casey Foundation (2009a). Improve the nation’s data on children and families, issue brief. Available at
  65. The, Annie E., & Foundation, Casey. (2009). The KIDS COUNT data book. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Google Scholar
  66. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2011). 2011, KIDS COUNT data book. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey. Available at
  67. UNICEF. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries, Innocenti Report Card No. 7. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. Google Scholar
  68. Untied Nations, (1989/1990). United Nations convention on the rights of children. Available at
  69. United Nations. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. Available at
  70. United Nations. (2014). Every child counts. New York, NY: United Nations. Google Scholar
  71. United States Department of Education. (2013). Literacy, numeracy, and problem solving in technology-rich environments among United States adults; results from the program for the international assessment of adult competencies 2012. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Google Scholar
  72. United States Department of Health and Human Services (1980). The status of children, youth, and families: 1979. DHHS Publication No. (OHDS) 80-30274. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Google Scholar
  73. United States Office of Management and Budget (1999 to 2009). Statistical programs of the United States Government; Annual Reports. Washington, DC: United States Office of Management and Budget. Google Scholar
  74. Voss, P. (1995). Indicators of Child Well-being in the United States, 1985–1992: An analysis of related factors. Baltimore, MD: The Applied Population Laboratory at the University of Wisconsin and The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Google Scholar
  75. Vuckovic, S. N., Doek, J. E., & Zermatten, J. (2013). The Rights of the Child in International Law. Rights of the Child in a Nutshell and in Context. Bern: Stamlfli. Google Scholar
  76. Wallman, K. K. (2011). Foreword to America’s Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, 2011. Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics, U.S Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Page iii. Available online at
  77. Waldfogel, J. (2010). Britain’s war on poverty. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar
  78. Wilson-Ahlstrom, A., Yohalem, N., Dubois, D., & Ji, P. (2011). From soft skills to hard data: Measuring youth program outcomes. New York: The Forum for Youth Investment. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Annie E. Casey FoundationBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations