Skip to main content

Abstract

The specialization exists in biological systems and in human organizations, as a methodology to improve processes and optimize their aims. This specialization in artificial intelligent systems such as multi-agent systems, can improve their aims, depending on the type of specialization and the goals which they need to achieve. The enterprise networks are a collaboration model between companies which we can apply over these intelligent systems, so that, these systems can achieve more complex aims. Therefore, in this collaboration type, is necessary to consider their specialization type, and how they could collaborate to achieve aims, that by themselves would not be possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wenseleers, T., Ratnieks, F., Billen, J.: Caste fate conflict in swarm-founding social hymenoptera: an inclusive fitness analysis. Evolutionary Biology 16(1), 647–658 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G.: Role and variability of response thresholds in the regulation of division of labour in insect societies. In: Deneubourg, J., Pasteels, J. (eds.) Information Processing in Social Insects, pp. 141–163. Springer, s.l. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Noirot, C., Pasteels, J.: Ontogenetic development and the evolution of the worker caste in termites. Experientia 43(1), 851–860 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Melinkoff, R.V.: La Estructura de la Organización. Universidad de Venezuela, s.l. (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borisov, E.F., Zhamin, V.A., Makarova, M.F.: Diccionario de Economía Política. España, Barcelona (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beccera, F.: Las redes empresariales y la dinámica de la empresa: aproximación teórica. INNOVAR. Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales 18(32), 27–45 (2008) 0121-5051

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sánchez, N., Fuentes, V., Carbó, J., Molina, J.M.: Knowledge-based system to define context in commercial applications. In: 8th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD 2007) and 3rd ACIS International Workshop on Self-Assembling Wireless Networks (SAWN 2007), pp. 694–699. s.n., Qingdao (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garijo, F., Gómes-Sanz, J.J., Pavón, J., Massonet, P.: Multi-agent system organization: An engineering perspective. Pre-Proceeding of the 10th European Workshop on Modeling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, MAAMAW 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Román, J.Á., Rodríguez, S., Corchado, J.M.: Distributed and Specialized Agent Communities. In: Pérez, J.B., et al. (eds.) Trends in Pract. Appl. of Agents & Multiagent Syst. AISC, vol. 221, pp. 33–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Román, J.A., Tapia, D.I., Corchado, J.M.: SCODA para el Desarrollo de Sistemas Multiagente. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas y Tecnologías de Información 8, 25–38 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rusu, M.: Smart Specialization a Possible Solution to the New Global Challenges. Procedia Economics and Finance 6, 128–136 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baum, H., Schütze, J.: An Organizational Concept for Collaborative Enterprise Networks. Procedia CIRP 7, 55–60 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodríguez, S., de Paz, Y., Bajo, J., Corchado, J.M.: Social-based planning model for multiagent systems. Expert Systems with Applications 38(10), 13005–13023 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pinzón, C.I., Bajo, J., De Paz, J.F., Corchado, J.M.: S-MAS: An adaptive hierarchical distributed multi-agent architecture for blocking malicious SOAP messages within Web Services environments. Expert Systems with Applications 38(5), 5486–5499

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tapia, D.I., Abraham, A., Corchado, J.M., Alonso, R.S.: Agents and ambient intelligence: case studies. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 1(2), 85–93 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tapia, D.I., De Paz, J.F., Rodríguez, S., Bajo, J., Corchado, J.M.: Multi-agent system for security control on industrial environments. International Transactions on System Science and Applications Journal 4(3), 222–226 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bajo, J., De Paz, J.F., Rodríguez, S., González, A.: Multi-agent system to monitor oceanic environments. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 17(2), 131–144 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bajo, J., Corchado, J.M.: Evaluation and monitoring of the air-sea interaction using a CBR-Agents approach. In: Muñoz-Ávila, H., Ricci, F. (eds.) ICCBR 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3620, pp. 50–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodríguez, S., Pérez-Lancho, B., De Paz, J.F., Bajo, J., Corchado, J.M.: Ovamah: Multiagent-based adaptive virtual organizations. In: 12th International Conference on Information Fusion, FUSION 2009, pp. 990–997 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rodríguez, S., de Paz, Y., Bajo, J., Corchado, J.M.: Social-based planning model for multiagent systems. Expert Systems with Applications 38(10), 13005–13023 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Corchado, J.M., Bajo, J., De Paz, J.F., Rodríguez, S.: An execution time neural-CBR guidance assistant. Neurocomputing 72(13), 2743–2753 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Murciano, A., Millan, J.: Learning signaling behaviours and specialization in cooperative agents. Adaptative Behaviour 5(1), 5–28 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li, L., Martinoli, A., Abu-Mostafa, Y.S.: Emergent specialization in swarm systems. In: Yin, H., Allinson, N.M., Freeman, R., Keane, J.A., Hubbard, S. (eds.) IDEAL 2002. LNCS, vol. 2412, pp. 261–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Chai, L., Chen, J., Han, Z., Di, Z., Fan, Y.: Emergence of Specialization from Global Optimizing Evolution in a Multi-agent Systems. In: Shi, Y., van Albada, G.D., Dongarra, J., Sloot, P.M.A. (eds.) ICCS 2007, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 4490, pp. 98–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Okamoto, S., Scerri, P., Sycara, K.: The Impact of Vertical Specialization on Hierarchical Multi-Agent Systems. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Trueba, P., et al.: Specialization analysis of embodied evolution for robotic collective tasks. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 61, 682–693 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brutschy, A., et al.: Costs and benefits of behavioral specialization. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 60, 1408–1420 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nitschke, G., Schut, M., Eiben, A.: Emergent specialization in biologically inspired collective behavior systems. Intelligent Complex Adaptive Systems, 100–140 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bongard, J.C.: The legion system: A novel approach to evolving heterogeneity for collective problem solving. In: Poli, R., Banzhaf, W., Langdon, W.B., Miller, J., Nordin, P., Fogarty, T.C. (eds.) EuroGP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1802, pp. 16–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Stone, P., Veloso, M.: Towards collaborative and adversarial learning: A case study in robotic soccer. Evolution and Learning in Multi-Agent Systems 48(1), 83–104 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Whiteson, S., et al.: Evolving keep-away soccer players through task decomposition. In: Proceeding of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 356–368. AAAI Press, Chicago (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Blumenthal, J., Parker, G.: Competing sample sizes for the co-evolution of heterogeneous agents. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1438–1443. IEEE Press, Sendai (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Arkin, R.: Behavior based robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Arkin, R., Balch, T.: Behavior-based formation control for multi-robot teams. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 14(6), 926–939 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Balch, T.: Measuring robot group diversity. In: Balch, T., Parker, E. (eds.) Robot Teams: From Diversity to Polymorphism, Natick, pp. 93–135 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  36. ecma. The JSON Data Interchange Format. Starndard ecma-404 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Arruñada, B.: Economía de la Empresa: Un enfoque contractual. Ariel, Barcelona (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Román, J.A., Rodríguez, S., Corchado, J.M. (2014). Improving Intelligent Systems: Specialization. In: Corchado, J.M., et al. Highlights of Practical Applications of Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Systems. The PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 430. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07767-3_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07767-3_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07766-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07767-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics