Computerized Information Standards Enabling Innovation in Public Procurement of Buildings

  • Christian Koch
  • Kim Jacobsen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8521)


Computerized and standardized information enables innovation in processes, products and services. Where early research on the impact of standards tended to focus on barriers, more recent research advocates standardisation as enabler of innovation albeit in a stakeholder-oriented, flexible manner. This paper asks whether computerized information standards enable or constrain innovation in public procurement of buildings. In architectural and engineering design of public buildings handling of information involves interoperability problems that hamper innovation. Moreover the project based product development tends be done in constellations of firms in interorganisational contracting, which do not provide stability or room for innovation. A large hospital project was investigated through interviews, documents and observations. The effects of implementing building information standards are both inter- and intraorganisational. The building client claims to have saved money, through better structured building component data that gave considerable positive effects during tendering. The IT-suppliers develop IT-tools, preparing for new markets.


information standards innovation hospital building Denmark 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bernstein, H.M.: The Business Value of BIM in Europe. McGraw-Hill, Bedford (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernstein, H.M.: The Business Value of BIM in North America. McGraw-Hill, Bedford (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    STD: Sector Review The Consulting Engineering and Architectural Groups. A Swedish and International survey. The Swedish Federation of Consulting Engineers and Architects (STD). Stockholm (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laakso, M., Kiviniemi, A.: The IFC Standard - A Review of History, Development, and Standardization. Journal of Information Technology in Construction 17, 134–161 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cuneco: Website in English of cuneco, the Danish center for classification and productivity in construction (accessed January 2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andersen, U.: Digitale tilbudslister sparer Gødstrup Sygehus for mindst 20 mio. kroner. Ingeniøren 6 (September 2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    EU: Directive 2012/27/EU on energyefficiency. The European Parliament and of the Council. Bruxelles (2012) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Piller, F.T., Tseng, M.M.: Handbook of Research in Mass Customisation and Personalization World Scientific New Jersey (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clark, K.B., Baldwin, C.Y.: Design Rules. The Power of Modularity, vol. 1. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Walsham, G.: Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. Wiley, Chichester (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Scott, S.V.: Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Annals of the Academy of Management 2, 433–474 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Botero, A., Vihavainen, S., Karhu, K.: From closed to open to what?: an exploration on community innovation principles. In: Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R.: The Oxford Handbook of Innovations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koch, C.: Innovation networking between stability and political dynamics. Technovation 24(9), 729–739Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    OECD: Oslo Manual, Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd edn. OECD Publishing, Paris (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chang, T.-R., Kaasinen, E.: Three user-driven innovation methods for co-creating cloud services. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 6949, pp. 66–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koch, C., Chan, P.: Projecting an Infrastructure - Shaping a community. In: Carrillo, P., Chinowsky, P. (eds.) Proceedings EPOC 2013 Conference. Engineering Project Organization Society, Colorado (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Timmermans, S., Epstein, S.: A World of Standards but not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standards and Standardization. Annual Review of Sociology 36, 69–89 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farrell, J., Saloner, G.: Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation. The RAND Journal of Economics 16(1), 70–83 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kahan, M., Klaussner, M.: Standardization and Innovation in Corporate Contracting (Or "The Economics of Boilerplate"). Virginia Law Review 83(4), 713–770 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ekholm, A., Blom, H., Eckerberg, K., Löwnertz, K., Tarandi, V.: BIM – Standardiseringsbehov. Svenska Byggbranschens Utvecklingsfond, Stockholm (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lillrank, P.: The Quality of Standard, Routine and NonroutineProcesses. Organization Studies 24(2), 215–233 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sandholtz, K.: Making Standards Stick: A Theory of Coupled vs. Decoupled Compliance. Organization Studies 33(5-6), 655–679 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gallaher, M.P., O’Connor, A.C., Jr. Dettbarn, J.L., Gilday, L.T.: Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schilling, M.: Strategic Management of Technological Innovation. McGraw-Hill, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bowker, G.C., Star, S.L.: Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jacobsen, K.: Powerpoint serie om muligheder for standardisering af byggeprocesser. Balslev og Jacobsen A/S. København (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Omniclass: Omniclass website (accessed January 2014),
  29. 29.
    Fomin, V.V.: Standards as Hybrids: An Essay on Tensions and Juxtapositions in Contemporary Standardization. International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research 10(2), 59–68 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Koch
    • 1
  • Kim Jacobsen
    • 2
  1. 1.Chalmers University of TechnologyGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.K-Jacobsen A/SCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations