Skip to main content

The Romanian Welfare State at Times of Crisis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges to European Welfare Systems

Abstract

The chapter discusses the evolution of Romanian labour-market and welfare policies within the context of the global financial crisis, investigating the demographic, macroeconomic, and political dimensions that shaped this evolution. High labour migration from Romania amplified the sensitivity of domestic markets to developments in other European economies and augmented the problem of population ageing. Child poverty, severe deprivation and marginalization among ethnic Roma remained serious social problems, but they neither became policy priorities nor inspired adequate welfare measures.

Romania reacted to the crisis by scaling-back the state and deregulating the labour market. Salaries in the state sector were uniformly cut by 25 % and the VAT was increased from 19 to 24 % in June 2010. The democrat-liberal government of 2008–2012 sought to diminish the political costs of austerity by fuelling already-existing contestations of state redistribution and public services (as being ineffective) and de-legitimizing claimants. New regulations denied social benefits to all those having debts of taxes or public fees, and controls over local welfare authorities intensified. Eligibility for the means-tested family allowance and the guaranteed minimum income tightened, and their values froze at 2009 levels. Middle-class pressures safeguarded the generosity of earnings-related childcare leave benefits, which nonetheless hardly reach out to the large segment of precarious workers and long-term unemployed. Overall, social spending fluctuated around 16–17 % of the GDP, the lowest in the EU. The political crisis of January 2012 imposed a change of discourse on social matters, and incremental adjustments were performed by the subsequent social-liberal cabinet. However, no paradigmatic shift could be observed in strengthening the welfare state towards greater decommodification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See the Opinion of the European Commission on the Membership Request of Romania, EC, Doc/97/18, http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/dwn/opinions/romania/ro-op_en.pdf (accessed in June 2011).

  2. 2.

    The replacement rate of the earnings-related childcare leave benefit was 85 %, with a baseline set at 600 lei (150 € in 2008) at the time 12 % higher than the minimum gross wage, thus it encouraged low-income parents to opt out of work.

  3. 3.

    “The crisis has shown us that the social state cannot function anymore in Romania, in the sense that we use the term social state. We will have to define what the social state means here, for us, in the Carpathians” [Criza ne-a arătat că statul social nu poate funcţiona, în Româna, în înţelesul pe care noi l-am dat expresiei stat social. Va trebui, dacă avem forţă s-o facem, să definim ce înseamnă stat social, aici, la noi, în Carpaţi]. Declaration of Traian Basescu, president of Romania, 18th of January 2011, Bucharest.

    See http://www.politicaromaneasca.ro/traian_basescu_statul_social_nu_mai_este_un_termen_viabil-2748 (20.03.2014).

  4. 4.

    Following the decree O.U.G. 770/1975 on the prohibition of abortion and the commercialization of contraceptives, the cohort born in 1967 was twice as large as the previous ones.

  5. 5.

    According to European Commission (2014: 54), 95 thousand economically active Romanians were residing for up to 2 years in another EU country in 2012.

  6. 6.

    See European Commission (2011b): Migrants in Europe. Brussels: The EU, p.18. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-31-10-539/EN/KS-31-10-539-EN.PDF (Accessed: 20.03.2014).

  7. 7.

    See http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/population/documents/Tab/report.pdf (Accessed: 20.03.2014), p. 102.

  8. 8.

    World Health Organization (2014a), European HFA Database, http://data.euro.who.int/hfadb (17.06.2014)

  9. 9.

    World Health Organization (2014b), World Health Statistics 2014. Indicator compedium, http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/whs2014_indicatorcompendium.pdf?ua=1 (20.09.2014).

  10. 10.

    http://discutii.mfinante.ro/static/10/Mfp/pdc/Programconvergenta_ro.pdf (02.04.2014).

  11. 11.

    http://www.InstitutulNationaldeStatisticase.ro/cms/files_buletine2010/bsl_1.pdf; http://www.InstitutulNationaldeStatisticase.ro/cms/files_buletine2011/bsl_1.pdf (02.04.2014).

  12. 12.

    See Eurostat (2014b) http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tec00127&plugin=0 (02.04.2014).

  13. 13.

    O.U.G./28.06.2010, http://www.financiarul.ro/wp-content/uploads/Ordonanta-modificare-Cod-Fiscal.pdf (20.03.2014).

  14. 14.

    http://www.mbuget.gov.ro/buget/numarpersonal.html?pagina=buget2013&locale=ro (01.07.2014).

  15. 15.

    The social-liberal coalition USL was formed in February 2011 by the Social Democratic Party—PSD and National Liberal Party—PNL, also in coalition with the smaller Conservatory Party. USL won the parliamentary elections held in December 2012.

  16. 16.

    The Democrat Liberal Party—PDL won the parliamentary elections in December 2008 and the presidential elections in 2009.

  17. 17.

    Following the New Labour Code adopted by Law 40/2011 (see Monitorul Oficial, Partea I, No. 225, 31 March 2011) the legislation on day-labourers (“zilieri”) was introduced by the Law 52/2011 (published in Monitorul Oficial, Partea I No. 276, 20 April 2011). Companies in certain labour-intensive economic domains, with high seasonal fluctuations (such as agricultural activities, fishery, forestry, artistic production, cleaning services etc.) may contract day-labourers and pay them with a gross hourly wage between 2 and 10 lei/hour. The duration of the working day cannot exceed 12 h, and the payment should correspond to at least 8 h. Contractors of day-labourers ought to keep a registry of their workers and pay 16 % flat-rate income tax for their earnings, but no social insurance contributions. This means that a day-labourer working 8 h for the minimum of 2 lei/hour, receives net earnings of 268.8 lei/month, i.e., half of the statutory minimum gross wage. Day-labourers are supposed to pay their own health-care and social security contributions. They are entitled to receive GMI benefits, but they should perform the compulsory community work. Law 277/2013 modified slightly the regulations, allowing work as day-labourers for adolescents aged 15–16 with the consent of their parents (initially, the minimum age requirement was 16 years) and prohibiting work during the night for those under 18 years old.

  18. 18.

    The new law on social assistance (Law 292/2011) recalculated each social benefit as a function of the National Reference Indicator (NRI), which was introduced in 2008 with the amount of 500 lei/person (at that time, equal to the minimum gross wage). Although the national minimum gross wage, subject to tripartite negotiations, increased significantly from 500 lei in 2008 to 850 lei/month in 2014, the NRI has not been indexed since 2008.

  19. 19.

    See, for example, the Social Company from Campia-Turzii (Combinatul Social Campia Turzii), www.ajofmcluj.ro (15.04.2014) and the 2013 joint report of UNDP, DRI, ACR and CADI, Social economy and Roma communities: challenges and opportunities, http://www.undp.ro/libraries/projects/Economia_Sociala_si_Comunitatile_de_Romi_Provocari_si_Oportunitati.pdf (15.04.2014).

  20. 20.

    http://www.cnpas.org/images/data/cnpas/statistics2/17martie2010_S1/niv_chelt_anual; http://www.sar.org.ro/art/publicatii_/pwr__ewr/raport_anual_de_analiza_si_prognoza__2010-436-ro.html (accessed: 20.03.2014).

  21. 21.

    http://www.cnpas.org/images/data/cnpas/statistics/grafice/deficit_pib.gif (Accessed: 20.03.2014).

  22. 22.

    http://www.cnpas.org/content/cnpas/others/presedinte%20cnpas/PARCALAB_CNPAS/2010/legea%20263_2010/LEGEA%20nr.%20263-2010%20cu%20modificari%20si%20completari.doc

  23. 23.

    http://www.cnpas.org/content/cnpas/others/presedinte%20cnpas/PARCALAB_CNPAS/2010/legea%20263_2010/LEGEA%20nr.%20263-2010%20cu%20modificari%20si%20completari.doc

  24. 24.

    The Law 118/2010 changes the name of the minimum guaranteed pension (introduced as a statutory right of all old-age pensioners by O.U.G. 6/2009): the term “pensie socială minimă garantată” is replaced with “indemnizaţie socială pentru pensionari” (social benefit/indemnity for pensioners). This allowed the government to set the value of the pension according to the national social reference indicator.

  25. 25.

    http://www.mmuncii.ro/ro/articole/0000-00-00/pensia-sociala-minima-garantata-1080-articol.html

  26. 26.

    http://www.cnas.ro/norme-de-incasare-a-contributiei

  27. 27.

    http://www.ms.ro/?pag=208

  28. 28.

    http://www.mediafax.ro/social/ritli-ladislau-vom-avea-o-lista-negativa-cu-medicamente-si-analize-care-nu-vor-fi-platite-de-stat-8908637/

  29. 29.

    Following the political crisis of January 2012, when large-scale anti-government protests took place in the major cities of Romania, the democrat-liberal government led by Emil Boc resigned and it was replaced by the social-liberals, with Victor Ponta as prime minister.

  30. 30.

    There are certain situations that can be assimilated to working status: full-time students, registered unemployed during the first 6–9 months, while still receiving benefits, parents on maternity or child care leave, parents on sickness leave, receiving invalidity benefits or state pensions (Law 240/2009, modified by Law 118/2010 and O.U.G. 111/2010).

  31. 31.

    Authors’ estimations based on data provided by the Ministry of Labour, Statistical Bulletins, 2013.

  32. 32.

    They receive a monthly grant of 115 € (until their child reaches the age of 2 (or 3, in the case of disabled children). This amount is very generous, when compared to the net minimum wage of 125 €/month. Before October 2012, it was offered only to those parents who originally opted for a one-year paid leave and returned to work before their child turned one.

  33. 33.

    Between 2010 and 2012, two-parent families with incomes below 200 lei/month (approx. 50 €) received 7.5 €/month (but only for maximum four children!), and those with incomes between 200 and 370 lei, 6 €/month. Single parent families with incomes below 200 lei/month receive 12 €/month, and those with incomes between 200 and 370 lei 10 €/month. The benefits were upgraded by 15 % in May 2013.

  34. 34.

    Source: Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Protection and Elderly Persons, http://www.mmuncii.ro/j33/index.php/ro/transparenta/statistici/date-statistice (20.03.2014).

  35. 35.

    The value of the monetary at-risk-of-poverty threshold in Romania, according to the Eurostat methodology.

  36. 36.

    As part of the EU accession process, Romania issued its first National Strategy for Social Inclusion in 2002.

  37. 37.

    Getting out of Poverty. Publication of the European Commission at the Closing Conference of the European Year of Combatting Poverty and Social Exclusion (European Commission 2010).

  38. 38.

    The only National Programme in the field of social housing is the ANL Programme of the National Agency for Housing, which nevertheless only targets young persons below the age of 35, most importantly those coming from institutions of public child care and those with a high level of education and secure income.

  39. 39.

    According to the Law 114/1996 on housing, social housing ought to respect strict criteria of adequacy; however, the law allows for exceptions in emergency situations.

  40. 40.

    According to the Law 116/2002 on combating social marginalization, local authorities may collect an additional local tax on the second owned dwelling, in case that the owner does not rent it out, and use the collected taxes in order to finance the construction/reparations of social housing.

  41. 41.

    According to the UNDP/WB/EC Regional Roma Survey and the FRA Pilot Roma Survey (2011), in Romania 81 % of Roma live under the Eurostat poverty line (as compared with 40 % of non-Roma who reside in the proximities of interviewed Roma families), and 86 % lack basic household facilities (electricity, sewage, or both). 22 % of Roma children aged 7–15 do not attend school, and 55 % of those aged 4–6 are not in preschool. 52 % of adult Roma do not hold health insurance, and only 32 % are formally employed.

  42. 42.

    On discriminatory declarations of Romanian politicians, see the report of the US State Department Human Rights Commission (2010). For a critique of the implementation of the Romanian National Strategies for the Roma see Moisă et al. (2013).

  43. 43.

    Similarly, The Panel for the Evaluation of Public Policies in Romania (2009) points out that only 0.4 % of respondents live in social housing (both “regular” social housing and housing for young professional provided by the National Agency for Housing, ANL), as compared to the average EU-27 of 13.5 % who benefit from state-subsidized or free accommodation (Eurostat 2011).

  44. 44.

    For example, in the city of Cluj-Napoca (third largest city after Bucharest and Iasi), only 5 % of all places available in crèches are granted based on “social” criteria to families with a difficult socio-economic situation. See the criteria of access presented by the Administration of Creches, Cluj Napoca Municipality: http://www.creseclujnapoca.ro (May 2011). In public crèches, the cost is 1.5 €/day/child, whereas in public kindergartens approx. 2.4 €/day/child. Private services are much more expensive, approx. 7.5 €/day/child.

  45. 45.

    www.consiliulfiscal.ro/raportanual2011.pdf, pp. 18–19.

  46. 46.

    Romania participated in two successive waves of the European Social Survey (ESS) in 2006 and 2008, but unfortunately in none of the subsequent waves (see www.socialsurvey.org).

  47. 47.

    Activity report of Mariana Campianu (Liberal Party) issued upon her resignation as the Minister of Labour, Family, Social Protection and Elderly Persons, following the peak of the social-liberal coalition, 27.02.2014.

  48. 48.

    The European Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies, see http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/lsa/122100.pdf. (20.03.2014).

  49. 49.

    See the report of Mariana Câmpeanu, resigning liberal Minister of Labour, 27th of February 2014, www.mmuncii.ro (retrieved March 2014).

References

  • Anghel, R., & Horváth, I. (Eds.). (2009). Sociologia migrației, Teorii și studii de caz românești [Sociology of migration. Theories and Romanian case studies]. Iași: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciornei, I. (2012). The political incorporation of immigrant associations and religious organizations of the Romanian residents in Spain. Studia UBB Sociologia, 57(2), 51–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantin, D. L., Goschin, Z., & Danciu, A. R. (2011). The Romanian economy from transition to crisis. Retrospects and prospects. World Journal of Social Sciences, 1(3), 155–171. World Business Institute Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doboş (Pălăşan), C. (Ed.). (2010). Politica Pronatalista a Regimului Ceausescu. Iasi: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducatti Flister, L. (2013). Socioeconomic consequences of Romania’s abortion ban under Ceauşescu’s regime. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 5(2), 294–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERRC—European Roma Rights Centre. (2013). New ERRC country profiles 2011-2012 (Czech Republic, France, Italy, Macedonia, Serbia, Slovakia, Romania, Russia, Turkey and Ukraine). http://www.errc.org/article/country-profiles-2011-2012/4160. Accessed 1 Dec 2013.

  • Eurobarometer. (2012). Social climate. Special Eurobarometer 391, Wave EB77.4. Brussels: The European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm. Accessed 21 Mar 2014.

  • European Commission. (2010). Industrial relations in Europe 2010 report. Luxembourg: Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, Unit B1.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011a). The 2012 ageing report: Underlying assumptions and projection methodologies. European Economy, Issue 4/2011, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2011/pdf/ee-2011-4_en.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2014.

  • European Commission. (2011b). Migrants in Europe. Brussels: The EU. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-31-10-539/EN/KS-31-10-539-EN.PDF. Accessed: 20 Mar 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2014). Economic and social developments in Europe 2013. Brussels: EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies. (2013). Social housing in the EU in 2013. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2013/492469/IPOL-EMPL_NT%282013%29492469_EN.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2014.

  • European Social Surveys—ESS. (2006). www.europeansocialsurvey.org. Accessed 20 Mar 2014.

  • European Social Surveys—ESS. (2008). www.europeansocialsurvey.org. Accessed 20 Mar 2014.

  • European Union Social Protection Committee. (2014). Social Europe. Many ways, one objective. Annual Report of the SPC. Brussels: EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2008). Ageing characterises the demographic perspectives of the European societies. Eurostat Population Projections, Issue No. 72/2008. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/product_details/publication?p_product_code=KS-SF-08-072. Accessed 2 Apr 2014.

  • Eurostat. (2011). Migrants in Europe. A statistical portrait of first and second generation migrants. Brussels: EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2013a). European social statistics 2013. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-FP-13-001/EN/KS-FP-13-001-EN.PDF. Accessed 1 June 2014.

  • Eurostat. (2013b). Eurostat regional yearbook 2013. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-HA-13-001/EN/KS-HA-13-001-EN.PDF. Accessed 20 Apr 2014.

  • Eurostat. (2014a). ESPROSS dataset. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database. Accessed 2 Apr 2014.

  • Eurostat. (2014b). TGM table. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tec00127&plugin=0. Accessed 2 Apr 2014.

  • Fulton, L. (2011). Widening the gender gap: The impact of public sector pay and job cuts on employment and working conditions of women in four countries—A report prepared for the European Federation of Public Service Unions by the Labour Research Department. http://www.epsu.org/IMG/pdf/L_Fulton_Final_report.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2014.

  • Gheţău, V. (2004). Declinul demografic al României. Ce perspective? [The demographic decline of Romania. Which are the perspectives?]. Sociologie Româneasca, 2(2), 5–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghinăraru, C. (2010). Romania EEO ad hoc request, European Employment Observatory. http://www.eu-employment-observatory.net/resources/reports/Romania-AdhocRequest-AssessmentRecoveryandAusteritymeasures.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2014.

  • Hărăguș, M. (2008). Tranziţia la statutul de părinte în Europa. Evoluţii recente şi posibili determinanţi [Transition to parenthood in Europe. Recent evolutions and possible determinants]. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Presa Universitară Clujeană.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglot, T. (2008). Welfare states in East Central Europe, 1919-2004. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inglot, T., Szikra, D., & Rat, C. (2012). Reforming post-communist welfare states. Family policies in Poland, Hungary and Romania since 2000. Problems of Post-Communism, 59(6), 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INS—Romanian National Institute of Statistics. (2014a). Statistical yearbook 2013. Bucharest: INS.

    Google Scholar 

  • INS—Romanian National Institute of Statistics. (2014b). Tempo on-line dataset. www.insse.ro. Accessed 20 Apr 2014.

  • INS—Romanian National Institute of Statistics. (2014c). Migrația internațională a României. Bucharest: INS. www.insse.ro. Accessed 2 Apr 2014.

  • Kligman, G. (1998). The politics of duplicity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesaroş, E. (1977). Condiţiile dimensiunilor familiei în actuala etapă de dezvoltare a României [The conditions of the size of families in the present stage of the development of Romania]. Viitorul Social, 6(1), 96–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health. (2011). National health strategy. Bucharest: Ministerul Sănătății. http://www.ms.ro/documente/Strategia%20Nationala-Anexa1_9051_7184.doc. Accessed 20 Mar 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Labour, Family and Social Protection. (2008). Statistical bulletins. www.mmuncii.ro. Accessed 20 Mar 2014.

  • Ministry of Labour, Family and Social Protection. (2009). Studiu de impact asupra masurilor promovate prin OUG 105/2003 privind alocatia familiala complementara si alocatia de sprijin pentru familia monoparentala in perioada 2006-2008 [Impact study on the means-tested family allowance and lone-parent allowance introduced by OUG 105/2003 between 2006-2008]. Bucharest. www.mmuncii.ro. Accessed 15 May 2013.

  • Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Protection and the Elderly. (2013). Statistical bulletins. www.mmuncii.ro. Accessed 20 Mar 2014.

  • Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Protection and the Elderly. (2014). Press release on the report of resigning Minister Mariana Câmpeanu, 17th of February 2014, Bucharest. www.mmuncii.ro. Accessed 20 Mar 2014.

  • Moisă, F., Rostas, I. A., Tarnovschi, D., Stoian, I., Rădulescu, D., & Andersen, T. Ş. (2013). Raportul societăţii civile asupra implementării Strategiei Naţionale de Integrare a Romilor şi a Planului de Acţiune al Deceniului în ROMÂNIA în 2012 [Civil Society Report on the implementation of the National Strategy for Roma Integration and the Roma Decade Action Plan for 2012 in Romania]. http://www.romadecade.org/cms/upload/file/9270_file25_ro_civil-society-monitoring-report_ro.pdf. Accessed 6 Sept 2013.

  • Mureșan, C., Hărăguș, M., Hărăguș, T. P., Rebeleanu, A., & Rotariu, T. (2009). Raport privind situația vârstnicilor în România [Report on the situation of the elderly in Romania]. Cluj-Napoca: Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popa, R. M. (2006). Corpuri femeieşti, putere bărbătească [Female bodies, male power]. In O. Băluţă (Ed.), Gen şi putere. Partea leului în politica românească [Gender and power. The lion’s share in Romanian politics] (pp. 93–116). Iaşi: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, L. (2003). Post-socialist Romania. Political actors and the reform of the welfare policy in the 90’s. In F. Barth & C. Narowski (Eds.), Politik für die Hochschule im Europäischen Haus (pp. 49–63). Darmstadt: Bogen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, L. (2004). Politicile sociale est-europene intre paternalism de stat si responsabilitate individuala [East-European social policies between state paternalism and individual responsibility]. Cluj: Presa Universitară Clujeană.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, L. (2006). Child care, family and state in post-socialist Romania. In M. Mesner & G. Wolfgruber (Eds.), Politics of reproduction at the turn of the 21th century; The cases of Finland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Austria, and the US (pp. 109–127). Innsbruck: Studien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, L. (2009). Serviciile de îngrijire a sănătăţii [The health care services]. In M. Preda (Ed.), Riscuri și inechități sociale în România [Risks and social inequities in Romania] (pp. 152–167). Iași: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, L. (2011). Long-term care policy in Romania: A hesitant response to a pressing need. In A. Österle (Ed.), Long-term care in Central and South Eastern Europe (pp. 123–149). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preda, M. (2009). Sistemul de pensii [The pension system]. In M. Preda (Ed.), Riscuri și inechități sociale în România [Risks and social inequities in Romania] (pp. 98–108). Iași: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rat, C. (2009). The impact of minimum income guarantee schemes in Central and Eastern Europe. In A. Cerami & P. Vanhuysee (Eds.), Post-communist welfare pathways: Theorizing social policy transformations in CEE (pp. 164–181). Basignstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rat, C. (2010). Disciplining mothers: Fertility threats and family policies in Romania. GESIS Thematic Series on Social Sciences in Eastern Europe, Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Issue 1/2010, 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rat, C. (2012). Sărăcie şi marginalizare sociale în rândul familiilor cu copii [Poverty and social marginalization among families with children]. In T. Rotariu & V. Voineagu (Eds.), Inerţie şi Schimbare [Inertia and change] (pp. 179–198). Iaşi: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebeleanu, A. (2006). Politici în domeniul sănătăţii în contextul social al reformei din România [Health policies during social reform in Romania]. Cluj: Presa Universitara Clujeana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotariu, T., & Mezei, E. (2012). Populaţia României. Volum, structuri şi procese demografice [The population of Romania. Size, structure and demographic processes]. In T. Rotariu & V. Voineagu (Eds.), Inerție și schimbare [Inertia and change] (pp. 17–44). Iași: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, M., Crișan, R., Popescu, L., & Dumănescu, L. (2009). The Romanian social system between 1945 and 1989. In S. Hering (Ed.), Social care under the state socialism (1945-1989) (pp. 189–200). Leverkusen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandu, D. (2010). Home orientation in transnational spaces of Romanian migration. Studia UBB Sociologia, 55(2), 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandu, D. (2013, October 11). Romanian migration in the frame of the East-West migration system: Understanding its near future. In Workshop on labour market liberalization, The Hague. https://sites.google.com/site/dumitrusandu/. Accessed 2 Apr 2014.

  • SAR—Societatea Academică Română. (2010). Raport de analiză și prognoză (Analysis report and prognosis). Bucharest: SAR. http://sar.org.ro/art/publicatii_/pwr__ewr/raport_anual_de_analiza_si_prognoza__2010-436-ro.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraceno, C. (2004). De-familiarisation or re-familiarisation? Trends in income-tested family benefits. In T. Knijn & A. Komter (Eds.), Solidarity between the sexes and the generations. Transformations in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soare, F. (2010). Reglementarea accesului la avort şi contracepţia modernă în România comunistă [Reglementation of access to abortion and modern contraception in communist Romania]. In C. Doboş (Pălăşan) (Ed.), Politica pronatalistă a regimului Ceauşescu. O perspectivă comparativă (pp. 112–169). Iaşi: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stănculescu, M., & Pop, L. (2009). The transition process and changes in income, income inequality and poverty: The case of Romania. In M. Stănculescu & T. Stanovnik (Eds.), Activity, incomes and social welfare. A comparison across for new EU-member states. Vienna: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoiciu, V. (2012). Austerity and structural reforms in Romania: Severe measures, questionable economic results and negative social consequences. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transmonee Database. (2013). http://www.transmonee.org/. Accessed 20 Mar 2014.

  • UNDP. (2013). Report on social economy in Romania. Bucharest: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP/WB/EC Regional Roma Survey and the FRA Pilot Roma Survey. (2011). http://issuu.com/undp_in_europe_cis/docs/_roma_at_a_glance_web/1#download. Accessed 20 Mar 2014.

  • UNICEF. (1997). Central and Eastern Europe in transition; public policy and social conditions. Children at risk in Central and Eastern Europe: Perils and promises. Economies in transition studies. Regional Monitoring Report, No. 4. Florence: International Child Development Centre. http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/monee4sume.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2014.

  • Vincze, E. (2013). Socio-spatial marginality of Roma as form of intersectional injustice. Studia UBB Sociologia, 58(2), 217–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virga, D., Macsinga, I., & Sulea, C. (2012). Occupational health psychology in Romania: Managers’ and employees’ needs and perspective. Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 14(1), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization—WHO. (2012). The European health report 2012. Charting the way to wellbeing. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/197113/EHR2012-Eng.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2014.

  • World Health Organization—WHO. (2014a). European HFA Database. http://data.euro.who.int/hfadb. Accessed 17 June 2014.

  • World Health Organization—WHO. (2014b). World health statistics 2014. Indicator compendium. http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/whs2014_indicatorcompendium.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 20 Sept 2014.

  • Zamfir, C. (Ed.). (1999). Politici sociale în România: 1990-1998 [Social policies in Romania: 1990-1998]. Bucharest: Expert.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Livia Popescu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Popescu, L., Ivan, V., Raț, C. (2016). The Romanian Welfare State at Times of Crisis. In: Schubert, K., de Villota, P., Kuhlmann, J. (eds) Challenges to European Welfare Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07680-5_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics