Abstract
The social policy model evolving in Poland for the last 25 years is certainly still a model in the making and best characterized as “mixed”. Both the decentralisation of public administration and changes in the economic system aimed at strengthening the market economy, resulted in the creation of the “welfare blend” where the conservative and corporate tradition coexists with the elements of a liberal model. While dominated by partly privatised social insurance, which provides employment-related benefits, it is also supplemented by the universal, means-tested benefits. On top of that, the underdevelopment of the social services sector charges families with many social tasks connected with care and social support.
This duality becomes even more visible during the times of crisis. The state seems to be reluctant to introduce effective measures strengthening citizens’ capacity to be responsible for their welfare and social security. Despite several attempts to substantially limit the leading role of the state, public authorities, and not citizens, are still held responsible for the resolution of social problems and for the satisfaction of social needs. The preference for paternalistic state was clearly visible from the consecutive public opinion polls in the years 1992–2010. The clear majority considered public responsibility for the fulfilment of social needs as one of the major features of democracy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Both came into power in 2007 and managed to keep the position after the subsequent election of 2011.
- 2.
At the end of year 2010, there were 70 centres, 286 clubs and about 320 social cooperatives operating in Poland. Social contracts were provided for more than 112.5 thousand people. As for passive forms of social support, the most popular form was the unemployment benefit. At the end of December 2010, 326.6 thousand people were entitled to these benefits—that is, 53.4 thousand less than at the end of December of the previous year.
- 3.
The general rules do not apply to privileged groups, served by trade-specific retirement systems: the uniformed services, miners, teachers, railway employees, prosecutors, judges and farmers. These groups are subject to entirely different rules of calculation of retirement benefits, the retirement age is lower and the employment period indicators are more favourable.
- 4.
People born before 1949, not being participants of trade-specific systems, receive their retirement benefits according to the rules specified prior to the administrative reform of 1999, where the main criteria for granting of these benefits is reaching of retirement age and having a sufficiently long employment record.
References
Björnberg, A. (2012). Euro Health Consumer Index 2012. Report. Health Consumer Powerhouse. Accessed October 15, 2014, from http://www.healthpowerhouse.com/files/Report-EHCI-2012.pdf
CBOS Report BS/104/2013. Obligations of state toward citizen and citizen’s toward state. Warsaw: CBOS.
CBOS Report BS/34/2012. Opinions concerning the functioning of the healthcare system. Warsaw: CBOS.
CBOS Report BS/67/2012. The state policy towards the family. Warsaw: CBOS.
CBOS Report BS/77/2012. Opinions on changes in the retirement system. Warsaw: CBOS.
Central Statistical Office. (2006). Praca a obowiązki rodzinne w 2005 r. [Work and family duties in 2005]. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office.
Central Statistical Office. (2011). Unregistered employment in Poland in 2010. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office.
Central Statistical Office. (2012). Monitoring of the labour market. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office.
Central Statistical Office. (2014a). Narodowy Rachunek Zdrowia za 2012 rok [National health bill in 2012]. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office.
Central Statistical Office. (2014b). Labour force survey II quarter 2014. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office.
Curtarelli, M., Fric, K., Vargas, O., & Welz, C. (2014). Job quality, industrial relations and the crisis in Europe. International Revue of Sociology, 24(2), 225–240.
Czapiński, J., & Panek, T. (2012). Social diagnosis 2011. The objective and subjective quality of life in Poland. Report. Warsaw: The Council of Social Monitoring.
Golinowska, S. (2010). The system of long-term care in Poland. CASE Network Studies & Analyses No. 416/2010. Accessed October 15, 2014, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1710644_code1239313.pdf?abstractid=1710644&mirid=3
Kostrzewski, L., & Miączyński, P. (2013). Do pracy Polacy. Wzór? Polki [Poles to work. Role models? Polish women]. Gazeta Wyborcza. Accessed October 15, 2014, from http://www.archiwum.wyborcza.pl/Archiwum/1,0,7819832,20131203RP-DGW,Do_pracy_Polacy_Wzor_Polki,.html
Księżopolski, M. (2013). Between guarantees of communism and a paternalistic-market hybrid: Polish social policy at the turn of the 20th century. Poznan University of Economics Review, 13(3), 23–41.
Marczuk, B. (2013). Polska jest socjalna [Poland is social]. Rzeczpospolita. Accessed October 15, 2014, from http://www.rp.pl/artykul/1061605.html
Ministry of Infrastructure. (2010). Założenia polityki wsparcia mieszkalnictwa do 2020 roku [Housing support policy guidelines till 2020]. Warsaw. Accessed October 15, 2014, from http://www.ign.org.pl/files/content/76/Załozenia%20polityki%20wsparcia%20mieszkalnictwa%20do%202020%20r..pdf
Ministry of Labour and Social Policy. (2008). Przyczyny pracy nierejestrowanej w Polsce. Raport z badań [Causes of undeclared work in Poland. Research report]. Warsaw. Accessed October 15, 2014, from http://www.mpips.gov.pl/download/gfx/mpips/pl/defaultopisy/4718/1/1/Przyczyny%20pracy%20nierejestrowanej%20w%20Polsce.pdf
Ministry of Labour and Social Policy. (2013). Przegląd funkcjonowania systemu emerytalnego [Overview of functioning of the pension system]. Warsaw. Accessed October 15, 2014, from http://emerytura.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/20130626_przeglad.pdf
Murdoch, A. (2011). Emigracja lekarzy z Polski [Emigration of doctors from Poland]. Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza Szkoły Głównej Handlowej.
OECD. (2011a). OECD health data 2011 – frequently requested data. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2011b). Poland – long-term care, in help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care. Paris: OECD.
Okólski, M., & Kaczmarczyk, P. (2013). Przyszłość demograficzna Polski [Poland’s demographic future]. Opinie i Rekomendacje OBMF Nr 1/2013. Fundacja Ośrodek Badań nad Migracjami. Accessed October 15, 2014, from http://www.obmf.pl/publikacje/Opinie%20i%20Rekomendacje%20OBMF%20nr%201_2013.pdf
PMR. (2013). Rynek prywatnej opieki zdrowotnej w Polsce 2013. Prognozy rozwoju na lata 2013–2015 [Private health care market in Poland in 2013. Prognosis for development 2013–2015]. Kraków: PMR Publishing.
Rzemek, M. (2013). Bezrobotni nie szukają pracy [Unemployed are not looking for jobs]. Rzeczpospolita. Accessed October 15, 2014, from http://prawo.rp.pl/artykul/981852.html?print=tak&p=0
Sendrowicz, B. (2013). Polska bez etatów. Ponad milion osób ma tylko umowy o dzieło lub zlecenia [Poland without full time jobs. Over million people have only commission and mandate agreements]. Gazeta Wyborcza. Accessed October 15, 2014, from http://wyborcza.pl/1,76842,13601053,Polska_bez_etatow__Ponad_milion_osob_ma_tylko_umowy.html
Siemieńska, R. (2009). Gender, family and work. The case of Poland in cross-national perspective. International Journal of Sociology, 38(4), 57–75.
Siemieńska, R., & Domaradzka, A. (2009). The welfare state in Poland – transformation with difficulties. In K. Schubert, S. Hegelich, & U. Bazant (Eds.), The handbook of European welfare systems (pp. 378–397). London: Routledge.
Siemieńska, R., Domaradzka, A., & Matysiak, I. (2011). Local welfare in Poland from a historical and institutional perspective. WILCO Publication no. 09. Nijmegen: WILCO.
Siemieńska, R., Domaradzka, A., & Matysiak, I. (2012). Measures of social cohesion in Polish cities. Warsaw – WILCO Publication no. 31. Nijmegen: WILCO.
Wyborcza.biz. (2012). OECD ocenia polską opiekę zdrowotną: duże kolejki i mało prywatnych polis [OECD evaluates Polish health care: Long lines and low number of private insurances]. Accessed October 15, 2014, from http://m.wyborcza.biz/biznes/1,106501,11447711.html?i=0
Żukowski, M. (2012). Annual national report 2012. Pensions, health care and long-term care: Poland. Brussels: European Commission. Accessed October 15, 2014, from http://socialprotection.eu/files_db/1276/asisp_ANR12_POLAND.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Siemieńska, R., Domaradzka, A. (2016). Between Constrained Opportunities and Social Expectations: Social Policy in Contemporary Poland. In: Schubert, K., de Villota, P., Kuhlmann, J. (eds) Challenges to European Welfare Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07680-5_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07680-5_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07679-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07680-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)