Skip to main content

Abstract

Common bean and soybean are among the key crops for which specific actions are planned in the Plan for Agricultural Transformation in Rwanda (SPAT). Legume-based systems provide high-quality food, cash to farmers, and contribute to sustainable agricultural production systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the profitability of common bean, soybean, and groundnut cropping systems and examine the change in soybean profitability in response to variation in market price and yield. Data was collected through focus group discussions (FGDs), interviews with key informants, and formal questionnaire survey. The data were organized and analyzed using the enterprise gross margins approach. Results showed that soybean sole cropping systems were associated with low to high profitability both in terms of returns to land and returns to labor, low returns being predominant. The sensitivity analysis results led to two important conclusions. First, the increase in producer price will mostly benefit farmers who can achieve higher yields while having limited impact on the profitability of those lagging behind in soybean yield. Second, a price increase, although essential in the process of boosting soybean profitability, is not the best solution in the presence of low yield levels, if the necessary conditions are not present to permit a subsequent increase in yields. Common bean cropping systems were also characterized by low to high returns to land and labor with moderate returns being more frequent. Although climbing bean cropping systems had higher yields compared to bush beans, the two types of common bean had comparable returns to land due to high extra costs on labor and stakes associated with climbing bean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AGRA (Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa) (2009) Plant breeders from across the continent join forces to boost the “poor person’s meat,” raise incomes and combat hunger. http://www.agra-alliance.org/content/news/detail/892. Accessed 22 Jan 2013

  • Campbell HF, Brown RPC (2003) Benefit-cost analysis, financial and economic appraisal using spreadsheets. Cambridge University Press/University of Queensland, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavas JE, Kim K, Lauer J, Klemme R, Bland W (2001) An economic analysis of corn yield, corn profitability, and risk at the edge of the corn belt. J Agric Resourc Econ 26:230–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon JI, Hardaker JB (1989) Farm management research for small farmer development. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin 41. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittinger JP (1984) Economic analysis of agricultural projects, 2nd edn. Economic Development Institute. The World Bank http://www.stanford.edu/group/FRI/indonesia/documents/gittinger/Output/title.html. Accessed 24 Jan 2013

  • ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics) (2009) Groundnut (peanut). http://www.icrisat.org/groundnut/GroundNut.htm

  • Kelly V, Murekezi A (2000) Fertilizer response and profitability in Rwanda: a synthesis of findings from MINAGRI studies conducted by the Food Security Research Project and the FAO Soil Fertility Initiative. FSRP working paper. Kigali, Rwanda

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Duthie JA, Roberts BW, Taylor MJ, Edeldon JV (2003) Partial budget analysis of effects of crop management intensity on profitability of three watermelon cultivars. J Veg Crop Prod 9(1):49–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monke EAA, Pearson SR (1989) The policy analysis matrix for agricultural development. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndakidemi PA, Dakora FD, Nkonya EM, Ringo D, Mansoor H (2006) Yield and economic benefits of common bean (Phaseolus vulagaris) and soybean (Glycine max) inoculation in northern Tanzania. Aust J Exp Agric 46:571–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouédraogo S (2003) Impact économique des variétés améliorées du Niébé sur les revenus des exploitations agricoles du plateau central du Burkina Faso. Tropicultura 21(4):204–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis A, Boggess W, Moss C, Holt J (1995) Technology adoption decisions under irreversibility and uncertainty: an ex ante approach. Am J Agric Econ 77:541–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Rwanda (2004) Strategic plan for agricultural transformation in Rwanda. Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources, Kigali

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan J-P, Anderson JR, Belli P, Barnum HN, Dixon JA (2001) Economic analysis of investment operations: analytical tool and practical applications. World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Mugabo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mugabo, J.R., Chianu, J., Tollens, E., Vanlauwe, B. (2014). Returns to Production of Common Bean, Soybean, and Groundnut in Rwanda. In: Vanlauwe, B., van Asten, P., Blomme, G. (eds) Challenges and Opportunities for Agricultural Intensification of the Humid Highland Systems of Sub-Saharan Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07662-1_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics