Improving the Availability of Quality Planting Materials Through Community-Based Seed and Seedling Systems: The Case of Rural Resource Centres in Cameroon

Conference paper


Increasing the productivity in both crop and agroforestry subsectors is one of the measures taken to improve food security and livelihoods of subsistence farmers. This improvement can only be realized if subsistence farmers have access to quality planting material. The lack of high-quality planting material has been repeatedly identified as a major constraint to greater adoption of agroforestry innovations. The recognition of this fact has led to the development of national seed and seedling programs. However, the low capacity of these programs, the sluggish growth of the private sector, and the demand of subsistence farmers means they are obliged to seek alternative models. This paper discusses results and experiences drawn from a community-based seed and seedling production and dissemination system in the Western Highlands of Cameroon. The system is built on the concept of a rural resource centre in which capacities of farmers were strengthened to multiply improved planting material of four food crops and five fruit tree species. The rural resource centres are now sources of quality seeds and seedlings for farmers and institutional clients. The system has effectively improved the on-time dissemination, accessibility, affordability, and availability of quality planting material which are obtained at affordable prices due to proximity and reduced transport and distribution costs. Income from selling improved planting material has become an incentive for rural resources centres and helps to ensure sustainability of the system. Availability of quality seeds was found to increase on-farm crop yields by 20–40 %, while demand for improved seedlings has surpassed supplies in participating communities. The successful dissemination of this approach requires much more than the transfer of knowledge and availability of improved germplasm; it involves supporting the capacities of the rural resource centres, building partnerships with a range of stakeholders, increasing the involvement and interaction of government services, improving storage and marketing strategies, and decreasing dependency on external resources. The main challenge of the future is how to make such a system sustainable. Furthermore, in addition to the challenge of projecting and meeting the quantitative demands of farmers and other stakeholders, issues of seed quality and genetic diversity still need to be addressed when designing and implementing effective seed supply strategies and policies.


Community-based Rural Resource Centre Planting material Quality seeds Germplasm 



Funding for this work was provided by the United State Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) through the Agricultural and Tree Products Program in Cameroon.


  1. Asaah EK, Tchoundjeu Z, Leakey RRB, Takoutsing B, Njong J, Edang I (2011) Trees, agroforestry and multifunctional agriculture in Cameroon. Int J Agric Sustain 9(1):110–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buruchara R, Kimani, P (2009) Sustainable seed production – a proposal. Available at: Accessed 12 June 2011
  3. Catacutan D, Bertomeu M, Arbes L, Duque C, Butra N (2008) Fluctuating fortunes of a collective enterprise: the case of agroforestry tree seed association (ASAL) in the Philippines. Small-Scale Forest 7(3/4):353–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. David S (2004) Farmer seed enterprises: a sustainable approach to seed delivery? Agric Hum Values 21(4):387–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. David S, Sperling L (1999) Improving technology delivery mechanisms: lessons from bean seed systems research in Eastern and Central Africa. Agric Hum Values 16:381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hassan RM, Mekuria M, Mwangi W (2001) Maize breeding research in Eastern and Southern Africa: current status and impacts of past investments made by the public and private sectors, 1966–1997. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  7. Kibiby JM, Flavianus T, Magayane AZM (2001) Existing mechanisms for smallholders seed production and disseminations in Tanzania: a case of SUA B/C CRSP. Sokoine University of Agriculture, MorogoroGoogle Scholar
  8. Kugbei S, Bishaw Z (2002) Policy measures for stimulating indigenous seed enterprises. J New Seed 4:47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maredia M, Howard J, Boughton D, Naseem A, Wanzala M, Kajisa K (1999) Increasing seed system efficiency in Africa; concepts, strategies and issues. MSU International Development working paper no. 77, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824Google Scholar
  10. Mesfin A (2005) Analysis of factors influencing adoption of Triticale (X-Triticosecale Witmack) and Impact, the case of Farta Woreda, M.Sc. thesis, Alemaya University, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  11. Minot N (2008) Promoting a strong seed sector in sub-Saharan Africa. IFPRI Policy Brief 6: IFPRI, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. Mulatu E, Ibrahim OE, Bekele E (2005) Policy changes to improve vegetable production and seed supply in Hararghe, Eastern Ethiopia. J Veg Sci 11:81–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nyoka BI, Mng’omba SA, Akinnifesi FK, Ajayi OC, Sileshi G, Jamnadass R (2011) Agroforestry tree seed production and supply systems in Malawi. Small-Scale Forest 10(4):419–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rohrbach DD, Mtenga K, Kiriwaggulu M, Mwaisela S (2002) Comparative study of three community seed supply strategies in Tanzania. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics. Bulawayo, ZimbabweGoogle Scholar
  15. Takoutsing B, Tchoundjeu Z, Degrande AA, Gyau A, Nkeumoe F, Tsobeng A (2013a) Assessing the quality of seedlings in small-scale nurseries in the highlands of Cameroon: the use of growth characteristics and quality thresholds as indicators. Small-Scale Forest 13(1):65–77. doi: 10.1007/s11842-013-9241-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Takoutsing B, Asaah E, Yuh R, Tchoundjeu Z, Degrande A, Kouodiekong L (2013b) Impact of organic soil amendments on the physical characteristics and yield components of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in the Highlands of Cameroon. J Agric Sci Technol 3(4A):257–266Google Scholar
  17. Tchoundjeu Z, Degrande A, Leakey RRB, Nimino G, Kemajou E, Asaah E, Facheux C, Mbile P, Mbosso C, Sado T, Tsobeng A (2010) Impacts of participatory tree domestication on farmer livelihoods in west and central Africa. Forests Trees Livelihoods 19:217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weber JC, Bonkoungou EG (1993) The general situation of multipurpose tree/shrub seeds for agroforestry – some issues and needs. In: Somé LM, de Kam M (eds) Tree seed problems, with special reference to Africa. Symposium proceedings, International Union of Forest Research Organizations, Project Group P.2.04.00 Seed Problems, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, 23–28 November 1992. Bachhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 25–28Google Scholar
  19. Weber JC, Labarta Chávarri RL, Sotelo Montes C, Brodie AW, Cromwell E, Schreckenberg K, Simons AJ (1997) Farmers’ use and management of tree germplasm: case studies from the Peruvian Amazon Basin. In: Simons AJ, Kindt R, Place F (eds) Proceedings of an international workshop on policy aspects of tree germplasm demand and supply, International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, Kenya, 6–8 October 1997, pp 57–63Google Scholar
  20. Weber JC, Sotelo Montes C, Vidaurre H, Dawson IK, Simons AJ (2001) Participatory domestication of agroforestry trees: an example from the Peruvian Amazon. Dev Pract 11:425–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.World Agroforestry Centre, ICRAF-West and Central AfricaYaoundéCameroon

Personalised recommendations