Advertisement

What Is Beautiful in Cyberspace? Communication with Attractive Avatars

  • Sabrina Sobieraj
  • Nicole C. Krämer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8531)

Abstract

The face with its structural and nonverbal features is the most important cue in interpersonal face-to-face communication (e.g. Dion et al., 1972; Reis et al., 1990). The aim of the presented study is to examine whether physical attractiveness and nonverbal cues in virtual representations can elicit interpersonal effects comparable to those evoked in face-to-face contacts. In a 2 (observer’s nationality) x 2 (smiling, non-smiling) x 3 (sender’s attractiveness) x 2 (sender’s gender) x 2 (observer’s gender) experimental design 158 German and 128 Malaysian participants evaluated 18 faces (9 smiling, 9 non-smiling) concerning attractiveness, social competence and dominance. Analyses show several effects, e.g. indicating that the same facial features are attractive in virtual faces and human faces.

Keywords

Attractiveness avatars facial features nonverbal behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bessière, K., Fleming Seay, A., Kiesler, S.: The ideal elf: Identity exploration in World of Warcraft. CyberPsychology & Behavior 10, 530–535 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yee, N., Bailenson, J.N., Ducheneaut, N.: The proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-presentation on online and offline behavior. Communication Research 36, 285–312 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van Vugt, H.C.: Embodied agents from a user’s perspective. Ridderprint, Ridderkerk (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bente, G., Krämer, N.C., Petersen, A., de Ruiter, J.P.: Computer animated movement and person perception. Methodological advances in nonverbal behavior research. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 25, 151–166 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mühlberger, A., Wieser, M.J., Herrmann, M.J., Weyers, P., Tröger, C., Pauli, P.: Early cortical processing of natural and artificial emotional faces differs between lower and higher social anxious persons. Journal of Neural Transmission 116, 735–746 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buss, D.M., Shackelford, T.K.: Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology 6, 134–146 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E.F., Coats, G.: The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology 56, 431–462 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dion, K.K., Berscheid, E., Walster, E.: What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24, 285–290 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feingold, A.: Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin 111, 304–341 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eagly, A.H., Ashmore, R.D., Makhijani, M.G., Longo, L.C.: What is beautiful is good: a meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin 110, 109–128 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Langlois, J.H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A.J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., Smoot, M.: Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 126, 390–423 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khan, R., De Angeli, A.: The attractiveness stereotype in the evaluation of embodied conversational agents. In: Gross, T., Gulliksen, J., Kotzé, P., Oestreicher, L., Palanque, P., Prates, R.O., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5726, pp. 85–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weibel, D., Stricker, D., Wissmath, B., Mast, F.W.: How socially relevant visual characteristics of avatars influence impression formation. Journal of Media Psychology 22, 37–43 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cunningham, M.R.: Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, 925–935 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cunningham, M.R., Barbee, A.P., Pike, C.L.: What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59, 61–72 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cunningham, M.R., Roberts, A.R., Barbee, A.P., Druen, P.B., Wu, C.H.: “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68, 261–279 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Otta, E., Abrosio, F.F.E., Leneberg Hoshino, R.: Reading a smiling face: Messages conveyed by various forms of smiling. Perceptual and Motor Skills 82, 1111–1121 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reis, H.T., McDougal Wilson, I., Monestere, C., Bernstein, S., Clark, K., Seidl, E., Franco, M., Giodioso, E., Freeman, L., Radoane, K.: What is smiling is beautiful and good. European Journal of Social Psychology 20, 259–267 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krumhuber, E., Kappas, A.: Moving smiles: The role of dynamic components for the perception of the genuineness of smiles. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 29, 3–24 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krumhuber, E., Manstead, A.S.R., Cosker, D., Marshall, D., Rosin, P.L.: Effects of dynamic attributes of smiles in human and synthetic faces: A simulated job interview setting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 33, 1–15 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Deutsch, F.M., LeBaron, D., Fryer, M.M.: What is in a smile? Psychology of Women Quarterly 11, 341–352 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Diekman, A.B., Goodfriend, W.: Rolling with the changes: A role congruity perspective on gender norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly 30, 369–383 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ekman, P., Friesen, W.W., O’Sullivan, M., Chan, A., Diacoyanni-Tarlatzis, I., Heider, K.: Universals and cultural differences in the judgements of facial expressions of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53, 712–717 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matsumoto, D., Kudoh, T.: American- Japanese cultural differences in attribution of personality based on smiles. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 17, 231–243 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matsumoto, D., Olide, A., Schug, J., Willingham, B., Callan, M.: Cross-cultural judgments of spontaneous facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 33, 213–238 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Camras, L.A., Chen, Y., Bakeman, R., Norris, K., Cain, T.R.: Culture, ethnicity, and children’s facial expressions: A study of European American, mainland Chinese, Chinese American, and adopted Chinese girls. Emotion 6, 103–114 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hess, U., Beaupré, M.G., Cheung, N.: Who to whom and why-Cultural differences and similarities in the function of smiles. In: Abel, M.H. (ed.) An Empirical Reflection on the Smile, pp. 187–216. Edwin Mellen Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Matsumoto, D.: Cultural similarities and differences in display rules. Motivation and Emotion 14, 195–214 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schmid Mast, M., Hall, J.A.: When is dominance related to smiling? Assigned dominance, dominance preference, trait dominance, and gender as moderators. Sex Roles 50, 387–399 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krumhuber, E., Manstead, A.S.R., Kappas, A.: Temporal aspects of facial displays in person and expression perception: The effects of smile-dynamics, head-tilt and gender. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 31, 39–56 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Swami, V., Furnham, A., Joshi, K.: The influence of skin tone, hair length, and hair colour on ratings of women’s physical attractiveness, health and fertility. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 49, 429–439 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Briton, N.J., Hall, J.A.: Gender-based expectancies and observers’ judgments of smiling. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 19, 49–65 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yee, N.: The Norratians Scrolls: A Study of EverQuest (version 2.5) (2001), http://www.nickyee.com/eqt/report.html (retrieved)
  34. 34.
    Holzwarth, M., Janiszewski, C., Neumann, M.M.: The Influence of Avatars on Online Cosumer Shopping Behavior. Journal of Marketing 70, 19–36 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baylor, A.L.: The design of motivational agents and avatars. Educational Technology Research and Development 59, 291–300 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sobieraj, S.: What is virtually beautiful is good-Der Einfluss physiognomischer Gesichtsmerkmale und nonverbalen Verhaltens auf die Attribution von Attraktivität, sozialer Kompetenz und Dominanz (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabrina Sobieraj
    • 1
  • Nicole C. Krämer
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Psychology: Media and CommunicationUniversity of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany

Personalised recommendations