Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The How of Systemic Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systemic Thinking

Part of the book series: Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality ((TSRQ,volume 26))

  • 2421 Accesses

Abstract

The previous Chapters in this Section have addressed the who, the what, the why, and the where questions associated with messes and their constituent problems. This Chapter will address the how question. When we refer to how we are interested in the means used in the attainment of specific, purposeful goals. The means are the mechanisms utilized in moving from the current problem state toward a new desired state where the goals and associated objectives have been satisfied. Mechanisms produce the effects that, when taken in concert, move a mess from the current state to the desired state. The sections that follow will focus on nine elemental mechanisms that serve as the means of how. The first section will reveal the mechanisms of how, the second section will examine the abstract mechanism of method, and the third section will provide a framework that may be used when understanding messes and their constituent problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adams KM (2011) Systems principles: foundation for the SoSE methodology. Int J Syst Syst Eng 2(2/3):120–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal H, Renaud JE, Preston EL, Padmanabhan D (2004) Uncertainty quantification using evidence theory in multidisciplinary design optimization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 85(1–3):281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ancona D (2012) Sensemaking: framing and acting in the unknown. In: Snook S, Nohria N, Khurana R (eds) The handbook for teaching leadership: knowing, doing, and being. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ashby WR (1956) An introduction to cybernetics. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Beer S (1979) The heart of the enterprise. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown DB, Sim M (2009) Satisficing measures for analysis of risky positions. Manage Sci 55(1):71–84

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheney PH, Hale DP, Kasper GM (1990) Knowledge, skills and abilities of information systems professionals: past, present, and future. Inf Manag 19(4):237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Darby J (2006) Evaluation of risk from acts of terrorism: the adversary/defender model using belief and fuzzy sets (Sandia technical report SAND2006-5777). Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dempster AP (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann Math Stat 38(2):325–339

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Dempster AP (1968) Upper and lower probabilities generated by a random closed interval. Ann Math Stat 39(3):957–966

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Dervin B (1983) An overview of sense-making research: concepts, methods and results. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the international communication association, Dallas, TX, May 1983

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dervin B (1992) From the mind’s eye of the ‘user’: the sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In: Glazier JD, Powell RR (eds) Qualitative research in information management. Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, pp 61–84

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dervin B (1993) Sense-making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. J Knowl Manage 2(2):36–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dubois D, Prade H (1988) Possibility theory: an approach to computerized processing of uncertainty, 1st edn. Plenum Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Endsley MR (1988a) Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In: Proceedings of the human factors society 32nd annual meeting. Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, pp 97–101

    Google Scholar 

  17. Endsley MR (1988b) Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In: Proceedings of the national aerospace and electronics conference (NAECON). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, pp 789–95

    Google Scholar 

  18. Endsley MR (1995) Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(1):65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(1):32–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Endsley MR (1997) The role of situation awareness in naturalistic decision making. In: Zsambok CE, Klein GA (eds) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 269–283

    Google Scholar 

  21. Endsley MR (2000) Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: a critical review. In: Endsley MR, Garland DJ (eds) Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 3–28

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grant KA (2007) Tacit knowledge revisited—we can still learn from polanyi. Electr J Knowl Manage 5(2):173–180

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Gunnells K, Hale JE, Hale DP (2006) Revisiting knowledge, skills, and abilities needed for development and delivery project staff. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2006 southern association for information systems conference, Jacksonville, FL, 11–12 Mar 2006

    Google Scholar 

  24. Helton JC, Burmaster DE (1996) Guest editorial: treatment of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in performance assessments for complex systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54(2–3):91–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kahneman D (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am Econ Rev 93(5):1449–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 58(9):697–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2):263–292

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Keeney RL (1974) Multiplicative utility functions. Oper Res 22(1):22–34

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Klein GA, Calderwood R, Clinton-Cirocco A (1986) Rapid decision making on the fireground. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 30th annual meeting, pp 576–580

    Google Scholar 

  31. Klein GA, Moon B, Hoffman RR (2006) Making sense of sensemaking 1: alternative perspectives. IEEE Intell Syst 21(4):70–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Klein GA, Phillips JK, Rall EL, Peluso DA (2007) A data/frame theory of sensemaking. In: Hoffman RR (ed) Expertise out of control: proceedings of the sixth international conference on naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, pp 113–155

    Google Scholar 

  33. Klir GJ, Yuan BY (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Kurtz CF, Snowden DJ (2003) The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex-complicated world. IBM Syst J 42(3):462–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Leedom DK (2001) Report on 2001 sensemaking symposium. Evidence Based Research Inc, McLean

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lipshitz R, Klein G, Carroll JS (2006) Naturalistic decision making and organizational decision making: Exploring the intersections. Organization Stud 27(7):917–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lipshitz R, Strauss O (1996) How decision-makers cope with uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 40th annual meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, pp 188–192

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lipshitz R, Strauss O (1997) Coping with uncertainty: a naturalistic decision-making analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 69(2):149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  40. McCloskey MJ (1996) An analysis of uncertainty in the marine corps. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 40th annual meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, pp 193–198

    Google Scholar 

  41. Miller NL, Shattuck LG (2005) Applying a dynamic model of situated cognition to the investigation of mishaps. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 49th annual meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, pp 219–223

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mish FC (ed) (2009) Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary, 11th edn. Merriam-Webster, Springfield, Incorporated

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Bus Rev 69(6):96–104

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge. Organ Sci 5(1):14–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Nonaka I (2007) The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Bus Rev 85(7/8):162–171

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nonaka I, Toyama R (2003) The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowl Manage Res Pract 1(1):2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nonaka I, von Krogh G, Voelpel S (2006) Organizational knowledge creation theory: evolutionary paths and future advances. Organ Stud 27(8):1179–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Oberkampf WL, Helton JC (2005) Evidence theory for engineering applications. In: Nikolaidis E, Ghiocel DM, Singhal S (eds) Engineering design reliability handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  49. Paté-Cornell ME (1996) Uncertainties in risk analysis: six levels of treatment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54(2–3):95–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Polanyi M (1962) Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  51. Polanyi M (2009) The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rai SN, Krewski D, Bartlett S (1996) A general framework for the analysis of uncertainty and variability in risk assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2(4):972–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Renck R, Kahn EL, Gardner BB (1969) Continuing education in R&D careers (NSF report 69-20). Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rumsfeld D (2002) DoD news briefing by the secretary of defense on 12 Feb 2002

    Google Scholar 

  55. Russell DM, Stefik MJ, Pirolli P, Card SK (1993) The cost structure of sensemaking. In: Ashlund S (ed) Human Factors in computing systems: proceedings of the INTERACT ‘93 and CHI ‘93 conference on human factors in computing systems. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 269–276

    Google Scholar 

  56. Santamaria A, Warwick W (2009) Using a “Naturalistic” mechanism to capture cognition and dynamic behaviors in task network models: an overview. In: Proceedings of the 18th conference on behavior representation in modeling and simulation. BRIMS Committee, Suffolk, pp 97–104

    Google Scholar 

  57. Savage LJ (1954) The foundation of statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  58. Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Shannon CE (1948a) A mathematical theory of communication, Part 1. Bell Syst Tech J 27(3):379–423

    Google Scholar 

  60. Shannon CE (1948b) A mathematical theory of communication, Part 2. Bell Syst Tech J 27(4):623–656

    Google Scholar 

  61. Shattuck LG, Miller NL (2006) Extending naturalistic decision making to complex organizations: a dynamic model of situated cognition. Organ Stud 27(7):989–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart J Econ 69(1):99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Simon HA (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol Rev 63(2):129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Simon HA (1997) Administrative behavior: a study of the decision-making processes in administrative organizations, 4th edn. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  65. Snowden DJ (2000) The social ecology of knowledge management. In: Despres C, Chauvel D (eds) Knowledge horizons: the present and the promise of knowledge management. Butterworth Heinemann, Woburn, pp 237–266

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  66. Snowden DJ (2002) Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self-awareness. J Knowl Manage 26(2):100–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Snowden DJ, Boone ME (2007) A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Rev 85(11):69–76

    Google Scholar 

  68. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1971) Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychol Bull 76(2):105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Vitalari NP (1985) Knowledge as a basis for expertise in systems analysis: an empirical study. MIS Q 9(3):221–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (2004) Theory of games and economic behavior, 60th Anniversary edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  72. Warwick W, McIlwaine S, Hutton R (2002) Developing computational models of recognition-primed Decisions: progress and lessons learned. In: 11th conference on computer generated forces and behavior representations. Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, pp 323–331

    Google Scholar 

  73. Weick KE (1993) The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster. Adm Sci Q 38(4):628–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  75. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organ Sci 16(4):409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA

    Patrick T. Hester

  2. Department of Information Technology and Computer Science, University of Maryland University College, Adelphi, MD, USA

    Kevin MacG Adams

Authors
  1. Patrick T. Hester
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kevin MacG Adams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick T. Hester .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hester, P.T., Adams, K.M. (2014). The How of Systemic Thinking. In: Systemic Thinking. Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07629-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07629-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07628-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07629-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation