Advertisement

To What Extent System Usability Effects User Satisfaction: A Case Study of Smart Phone Features Analysis for Learning of Novice

  • Muhammad Shafiq
  • Muddesar Iqbal
  • Jin-Ghoo Choi
  • Zeeshan Rafi
  • Maqbool Ahmad
  • Wasif Ali
  • Saqib Rasool
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8518)

Abstract

Usability is a vital aspect of the machine interface. When users do not access the features of a machine, the features do not serve the design purpose. When a user confronts a different machine interface from his prior experiences, the learning process takes tremendous time and incurs cognitive stresses to the user. Smart phones, one of the most popular machines recently, share many common features regardless of vendors, but users find it very hard to switch them. It requires different clicks or touches to operate an application in one system and another. This paper focuses on evaluating the elements of smart phone systems, in terms of learnability and usability, such as Users, Tasks, Content, Context, Experience and Perception of users through survey. Then we conduct the task analysis for participants to evaluate the usability among users over the sampled smart phones of 3 latest brands. Our result shows that usability is a serious threat to the effectiveness of smart phones since 47% of the youth do not use smart phones at all, 31.5% of the users have accessibility threat for accessing its features and 45.5% of the users have usability threat. Overall just 23% of the users have fully adopted the features of smart phones.

Keywords

Task analysis user survey usability evaluation UI HCI 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Eslambolchilar, P., Webster, J., Niezen, G.: The evolution of number entry: A case study of the telephone. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8118, pp. 538–545. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    José Eustáquio Rangel de Queiroz and Danilo de Sousa Ferreira. A Multidimensional Approach for the Evaluation of Mobile Application User Interface (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Park, J.H.: A Study of Design That Understands the Influences on the Changes of Information Processing Ability of Users. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) Human Centered Design, HCII 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 538–547. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, J.A.: Competitive Success- How Branding Adds Value. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin, C.J., Hsieh, T.-L., Shiang, W.-J.: Exploring the Interface Design of Mobile Phone for the Elderly. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) Human Centered Design, HCII 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 476–481. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guo, Y., Proctor, R.W., Salvendy, G.: What Do Users Want to See? A Content Preparation Study for Consumer Electronics. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction, Part I, HCII 2009. LNCS, vol. 5610, pp. 413–420. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Narayanaswamy, S., Hu, J., Kashi, R.: User interface for a PCS smart phone. In: IEEE International Conference on (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cárdenas, C., Córdova, L.L., Benites, E.: Evaluating the Usability of Desktop of the OLPC Sugar. Av. Túpac Amaru 210 - Rimac / Lima 25 - Perú (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Preece, J.: Basic Standards of Design interface. In: Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Balogh, J., Cohen, M., Giangola, J.P.: Voice User Interface Design: Minimizing Cognitive Load. Addison Wesley Professional (February 9, 2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brown, C.: Cognitive Psychology. Sage Publications, London (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buzzi, M.C., Buzzi, M., Leporini, B.: Accessing e-Learning Systems via Screen Reader: An Example. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI/HCII 2009, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 5613, pp. 21–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eraslan, E.: Usability Evaluation of Mp3/CD Players (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hong, S., Kim, S.C.: Mobile Web Usability: Developing Guidelines for Mobile Web via Smart Phones. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) HCII/DUXU 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6769, pp. 564–572. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Freeman, the Freeman Ideas on Liberty (2011), www.thefreemanonline.org, http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/the-role-ofbrands-in-consumer-markets (retrieved March 12, 2012)
  18. 18.
    Zamzami, I., Mahmud, M.: User Satisfaction on Smart Phone Interface Design, Information Quality Evaluation. In: 2012 International Conference on Digital Object Identifier (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Want, R.: When Cell Phones Become Computers. IEEE Pervasive Computing (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim, S., Cho, Y.-S., Sung, Y.-W., Kim, Y.-G.: Search Word Suggestion Conversation Agent of User Experience based on Improvement of Smart Phone Usability. In: 2012 6th International Conference on New Trends (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, J., Gu, G., Xie, S., Xu, L.: First International Multi-Symposiums on Digital Object Identifier (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Shafiq
    • 1
  • Muddesar Iqbal
    • 2
  • Jin-Ghoo Choi
    • 1
  • Zeeshan Rafi
    • 2
  • Maqbool Ahmad
    • 2
  • Wasif Ali
    • 2
  • Saqib Rasool
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information and Communication EngineeringYeungnam UniversitySouth Korea
  2. 2.Faculty of Computing and Information TechnologyUniversity of GujratPakistan

Personalised recommendations