HCI Knowledge for UX Practices in the Web Development Process

  • Idyawati Hussein
  • Murni Mahmud
  • Abu Osman Md Tap
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8518)


Web development must consider good design in order to satisfy user interaction. However, for many users, the interfaces of Web applications are still difficult and frustrating to use. Frustration may not only result in personal dissatisfaction and inefficient use, but may also have a bad effect in the workplace. One experience with misleading data or unexpected results will undermine a person’s willingness to use an application for a long time. Knowledge of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) supports developers in designing useful, usable and pleasant computing technologies. However, regardless of this knowledge, practice of the waterfall approach is the main methodology, embedded and integrated in well-established procedures. This study reports the results of a survey of 82 individual practitioners who received a formal HCI and HCI-related education in their Web development projects. The study used a Likert-scale metric to measure the prevailing User Experience (UX) in explicit practice which is rooted in the HCI-related discipline. The findings indicate that enforcement of the use of HCI knowledge can strengthen the policy of integrating UX principles in the Web development process by the appropriate authority, e.g. university department for project assignment.


Emotional Characteristic System Development Life Cycle Hierarchical Goal Explicit Practice Personal Dissatisfaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Strong, G.W., Gasen, J.B., Hewett, T., Hix, D., Morris, J., Muller, M.J., Novick, D.G.: A Report: New Directions in Human-Computer Interaction Education, Research, and Practice (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gulliksen, J., Boivie, I., Persson, J., Hektor, A., Herulf, L.: Making a Difference – A Survey of the Usability Profession in Sweden. In: NordiCHI 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buie, E., Dray, S., Instone, K., Jain, J., Lindgaard, G., Lund, A.: How to Bring HCI Research and Practice Closer Together. In: CHI 2010, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, April 10-15, pp. 3181–3184 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mahmud, M., Hussein, I., Md Tap, A.O.: Human-Computer Interaction within the Malaysian University Curriculum Human-Computer Interaction and System Developments, pp. 51–63. IIUM Press, IIUM Repository (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Star Online: JPJ Targets 90% Online Transactions with Motorists by 2015. Published: Sunday July 31, 2011 MYT 4.35 pm (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bias, R.G., Marty, P., Douglas, I.: Usability/User-Centered Design in the iSchools: Justifying a Teaching Philosophy. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 53(4), 274–289 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gasen, J.B., Preece, J.: What Shapes the Face of Human-Computer Interaction in Higher Education? A Framework of the Influences. Journal of Computing in Higher Education Fall 8(1), 97–123 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gould, J.D., Boies, S.J., Lewis, C.: Making Usable, Useful, Productivity: Enhancing Computer Applications. Communication of the ACM 34(1), 75–85 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dillon, A., Sweeney, M., Maguire, M.: A Survey of Usability Evaluation Practices and Requirements in the European IT Industry. In: Alty, J., Guest, S., Diaper, D. (eds.) HCI 1993. People and Computers VII, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mao, J.-Y., Vredenburg, S.P.W., Carey, T.: The State of User-Centered Design Practice. Communication ACM 48(3), 105–110 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ji, Y.G., Yun, M.H.: Enhancing the Minority Discipline in the IT Industry: A Survey of Usability and User-Centered Design Practice. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 20(2), 117–134 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chilana, P.K., Ko, A.J., Wobbrock, J.O., Grossman, T., Fitzmaurice, G.: Post-Deployment Usability: A Survey of Current Practices. In: CHI 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 7-12, pp. 2243–2246 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Iivari, N.: Understanding the Work of an HCI Practitioner. In: NordiCHI 2006, Oslo, Norway, October 14-18 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schon, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Ashgate, Arena (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Putnam, C., Kolko, B.: HCI Professions: Differences & Definitions. In: CHI 2012, Austin, Texas, USA, May 15-10, pp. 2021–2026 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gould, J.D., Lewis, D.: Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think. Communication of ACM 28(3), 300–311 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vukelja, L., Müller, L., Opwis, K.: Are Engineers Condemned to Design? A Survey on Software Engineering and UI Design in Switzerland. In: Baranauskas, C., Abascal, J., Barbosa, S.D.J. (eds.) INTERACT 2007, Part II. LNCS, vol. 4663, pp. 555–568. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    O’Connor, R.: Exploring the Role of Usability in the Software Process: A Study of Irish Software SMEs. In: O’Connor, R.V., Baddoo, N., Cuadrago Gallego, J., Rejas Muslera, R., Smolander, K., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2009. CCIS, vol. 42, pp. 161–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sutcliffe, A.G.: Assessing the Reliability of Heuristic Evaluation for Website Attractiveness and Usability. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dayton, T.: Skills needed by User-Centered Design Practitioners in Real Software Development Environments. In: Report on the CHI 1992 Workshop. SIGCHI Bulletin, vol. 25(3), pp. 16–31 (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Idyawati Hussein
    • 1
    • 2
  • Murni Mahmud
    • 1
    • 2
  • Abu Osman Md Tap
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Informatics ScienceUniversiti Malaysia Sabah, International Campus LabuanLabuan F.T.Malaysia
  2. 2.Kulliyyah of Information and Communication TechnologyInternational Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)Kuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations