Designing a Homo Psychologicus More Psychologicus: Empirical Results on Value Perception in Support to a New Theoretical Organizational-Economic Agent Based Model
The study presents a new approach of modelling human behavior based on empirical evidence on individual differences in cognitive science and behavioral economics fields. Compared to classical studies of economics, empirical research makes use of the descriptive approach to analyze human behavior and to create models able to explain the behavior of investors and organizational traders in a more realistic way. Consistently, an economic assumption that has been strongly disputed by scientists is the concept of Homo Economicus, which is currently considered unable to capture all the details and variability that characterize human behavior (which we define, in opposition to the economic label, Homo Psychologicus). Thanks to recent empirical studies and the development of such advanced techniques as agent based models, new simulation studies are now capable of investigating a higher number of psychological variables. However, models which implement heuristics or fallacies often distribute these characteristics among all agents without distinction. The present study shows how it is possible to design multiple agents considering individual differences, which can have a different impact on organizational and economic behavior. Starting from several empirical studies, which show a negative relation between optimism and loss aversion, coefficients of the Value function of the Prospect theory have been reviewed to create agents characterized by different psychological strategies used to manage costs and risks.
KeywordsAgent Based Model Homo Economicus Loss aversion Optimism Prospect Theory Value function
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Ceschi, A., Hysenbelli, D., Sartori, R., Tacconi, G.: Cooperate or Defect? How an agent based model simulation on helping behavior can be an educational tool. Paper presented at the Paper Session Presented at the Meeting of the 3rd ebuTEL, International Workshop on Evidence Based and User Centred Technology Enhanced Learning, Trento, Italy (2013)Google Scholar
- 6.Ceschi, A., Hysenbelli, D., Slovic, P.: When awareness of those we cannot help demotivates us from helping those we can help: An agent-based simulation study of pseudoinefficacy. In: Dickert, S. (ed.) Paper presented at the Prosocial Responses to Donation Requests: Motivators and Demotivators. Symposium Conducted at the Meeting of the 55th TeaP Conference of Experimental Psychologists, Vienna, Austria (2013)Google Scholar
- 7.Ceschi, A., Sartori, R., Weller, J.: The factors of reasoning: Structures of belonging of heuristics and biases. Paper presented at the Poster Presented at the Meeting of the 24th SPUDM, Subjective Probability, Utility, and Decision Making. European Association of Decision Making, Barcelona (2013)Google Scholar
- 9.de Palma, A., Ben-Akiva, M., Brownstone, D., Holt, C., Magnac, T., McFadden, D., ... Wakker, P.: Risk, uncertainty and discrete choice models. Marketing Letters 19(3-4), 269–285 (2008)Google Scholar
- 11.Iyer, A., Lindner, A., Kagan, I., Andersen, R.A.: Motor preparatory activity in posterior parietal cortex is modulated by subjective absolute value. PLoS Biology 8(8), e1000444 (2010)Google Scholar
- 12.Janssen, M.A., Ostrom, E.: Empirically based, agent-based models. Ecology and Society 11(2), 37 (2006)Google Scholar
- 15.LeBaron, B.: Agent-based computational finance. In: Handbook of Computational Economics, vol. 2, pp. 1187–1233 (2006)Google Scholar
- 16.Rubaltelli, E., Dickert, S., Slovic, P.: Response mode, compatibility, and dual-processes in the evaluation of simple gambles: An eye-tracking investigation. Judgment and Decision Making 7(4), 427–440 (2012)Google Scholar
- 17.Sartori, R., Ceschi, A.: Biases, reasoning and personality in finance. International Journal of Psychology 47(suppl. 1), 109–151 (2012)Google Scholar