A Multi-agent Simulation: The Case of Physical Activity and Childhood Obesity

  • Rabia AzizaEmail author
  • Amel Borgi
  • Hayfa Zgaya
  • Benjamin Guinhouya
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 290)


Engaging in a regular physical activity appears to be an important factor in the prevention of childhood obesity, which became one of the major public health challenges worldwide. The literature suggests that the relationship between physical activity and obesity is complex with many intervening factors that come from different aspects of the child’s life. Yet, so far, the proposed models do not include all of the identified factors. The main objective of this study is to simulate the child’s behavior within his/her social and physical environments in order to understand precisely the relationship between the PA and childhood obesity. This paper proposes a simulation model using the multi-agent paradigm.


Complex Systems Simulation Multi-Agent Systems Epidemiology Childhood Obesity Physical Activity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mittal, S.: Emergence in stigmergic and complex adaptive systems: A formal discrete event systems perspective. Cogn. Syst. Res. 21, 22–39 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, D., Wang, L., Chen, J.: Large-Scale Simulation: Models, Algorithms, and Applications. Taylor & Francis (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rychetnik, L.: Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J. Epidemiol. Community Heal. 56, 119–127 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aziza, R., Zgaya, H., Guinhouya, B., Borgi, A.: Proposal for an agent-based knowledge model for the study of the relationship between physical activity and childhood obesity. In: Francophone Conference - Management and Engineering of Hospital Systems GISEH., Quebec (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Organization, W.H.: Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. World Health Organization (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guinhouya, B.C.: Physical activity during the development of the child. Medecine Sciences Publications, Paris (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vorwerg, Y., Petroff, D., Kiess, W., Blüher, S.: Physical activity in 3-6 year old children measured by SenseWear Pro®: direct accelerometry in the course of the week and relation to weight status, media consumption, and socioeconomic factors. PLoS One 8, e60619 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tappe, K.A., Glanz, K., Sallis, J.F., Zhou, C., Saelens, B.E.: Children’s physical activity and parents’ perception of the neighborhood environment: neighborhood impact on kids study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 10, 39 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ejima, K., Aihara, K., Nishiura, H.: Modeling the obesity epidemic: social contagion and its implications for control. Theor. Biol. Med. Model. 10, 17 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dangerfield, B., Abidin, N.Z.: Towards a model-based Tool for Evaluating Population-level Interventions against Childhood Obesity. In: 21st International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Seoul, Korea (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giabbanelli, P.J., Alimadad, A., Dabbaghian, V., Finegood, D.T.: Modeling the influence of social networks and environment on energy balance and obesity. J. Comput. Sci. 3, 17–27 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prachai, S.: The Design of Diabetes Simulation System using Multi-Agent. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 40, 146–151 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang, Y., Diez Roux, A.V., Auchincloss, A.H., Rodriguez, D.A., Brown, D.G.: A spatial agent-based model for the simulation of adults’ daily walking within a city. Am. J. Prev. Med. 40, 353–361 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guinhouya, B.C., Apété, G.K., Hubert, H.: The determinants of habitual physical activity in children: update and implications for care and prevention options in pediatric overweight/obesity. Rev. Epidemiol. Sante Publique. 58, 49–58 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nicolet, J.L.: Risks and complexity. Harmattan Editions (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kari, J.: Theory of cellular automata: A survey. Theor. Comput. Sci. 334, 3–33 (2005)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bonabeau, E.: Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7280–7287 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Qu, Z., Garfinkel, A., Weiss, J.N., Nivala, M.: Multi-scale modeling in biology: how to bridge the gaps between scales? Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 107, 21–31 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Müller, J.P.: From autonomous systems to multi-agent systems: Interaction, emergence and complex systems (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control. 8, 338–353 (1965)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rabia Aziza
    • 1
    Email author
  • Amel Borgi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hayfa Zgaya
    • 3
  • Benjamin Guinhouya
    • 3
  1. 1.LIPAH research laboratoryTunis-El Manar UniversityTunisTunisia
  2. 2.High Institute of Computing/ISIArianaTunisia
  3. 3.EA 2994, Public Health: Epidemiology and Healthcare Quality, Faculty for Health engineering and management/ILISUniversity Lille IILilleFrance

Personalised recommendations