Differences between Entrepreneurs and Managers in Large Organizations: An Implementation of a Theoretical Multi-Agent Model on Overconfidence Results

  • Riccardo Sartori
  • Andrea Ceschi
  • Andrea Scalco
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 290)


The well-known research carried out by Busenitz and Barney (1997) exploring differences in the decision-making processes between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations has been revisited and redesigned as a starting point to create a computational and theoretical Multi Agent Model (MAM) which shows differences in the decision-making processes. In the original study, researchers showed the presence of a different disposition in incurring in biases and in heuristics by entrepreneurs and managers. In particular, two interesting trend curves on the Overconfidence effect have been realized. Authors concluded by stating that the Overconfidence effect is significantly different in entrepreneurs and managers and helps distinguish between these two work categories. Starting from this conclusion and from their results, a computational and theoretical MAM has been designed, where, as suggested by the authors, different decision-maker agents can incur in the Overconfidence effect with different degrees.


Multi Agent Models Organizations Entrepreneurs Biases Overconfidence 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Begley, T.M., Boyd, D.P.: Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing 2, 79–93 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brockhaus, R.H.: Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal 23, 509–520 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A.M., Fischhoff, B.: Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92(5), 938 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Busenitz, L.W., Barney, J.B.: Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing 12(1), 9–30 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ceschi, A., Hysenbelli, D., Sartori, R., Tacconi, G.: Cooperate or Defect? How an agent based model simulation on helping behavior can be an educational tool. Paper Presented at the Paper Session Presented at the Meeting of the 3rd ebuTEL, International Workshop on Evidence Based and User Centred Technology Enhanced Learning, Trento, Italy (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ceschi, A., Hysenbelli, D., Slovic, P.: When awareness of those we cannot help demotivates us from helping those we can help: An agent-based simulation study of pseudoinefficacy. In: Dickert, S. (ed.) Paper presented at the Prosocial Responses to Donation Requests: Motivators and Demotivators. Symposium Conducted at the Meeting of the 55th TeaP Conference of Experimental Psychologists, Vienna, Austria (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Favretto, G., Sartori, R.: Le età dell’impresa. Franco Angeli, Milano (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S.: Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3, 552–564 (1977)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Low, M.B., MacMillan, I.C.: Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of Management 14(2), 139–161 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miner, J.B., Smith, N.R., Bracker, J.S.: Role of entrepreneurial task motivation in the growth of technologically innovative firms. Journal of Applied Psychology 74(4), 554–560 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ray, D.M.: The role of risk-taking in Singapore. Journal of Business Venturing 9(2), 157–177 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sartori, R., Ceschi, A.: Uncertainty and its perception: experimental study of the numeric expression of uncertainty in two decisional contexts. Quality & Quantity 45(1), 187–198 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sartori, R., Ceschi, A.: Assessment and development centers: judgment biases and risks of using idiographic and nomothetic approaches to collecting information on people to be evaluated and trained in organizations. Quality & Quantity 47, 3277–3288 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sexton, D.L., Bowman, N.: The effects of pre-existing psychological characteristics on new venture initiations. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston, MA (1984)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stevenson, H.H., Gumpert, D.E.: The heart of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review 63(2), 85–94 (1985)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Riccardo Sartori
    • 1
  • Andrea Ceschi
    • 1
  • Andrea Scalco
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations