Advertisement

Uterine Wall Pathology

  • Patricia Carrascosa
  • Carlos Capuñay
  • Carlos E. Sueldo
  • Juan Mariano Baronio
Chapter

Abstract

The uterus plays a primordial role in the transport of spermatozoids. In the evaluation of the infertile patient, the uterine pathology does not occupy a principal place. As a unique factor, the uterine disorders represent only 5 % of the causes of infertility; nevertheless it can be linked to other alterations and represent an important cause in patients with frequent abortions.

Keywords

Uterine Cavity Endometrial Polyp Endometrial Cavity Endometrial Stroma Uterine Muscle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Taylor A. ABC of subfertility: extent of the problem. BMJ. 2003;327:434–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Donnez J, Jadoul P. What are the implications of myomas on fertility? A need for a debate? Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1424–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hunt JE, Wallach EE. Uterine factors in infertility – an overview. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1974;17:44–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buttram Jr VC, Reiter RC. Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomatology, and management. Fertil Steril. 1981;36:433–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baird D, Dunson D, Hill M, et al. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:100–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heinemann K, Thiel C, Mohner S, et al. Benign gynecologic tumors: estimated incidence results of the German Cohort Study on Women’s Health. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;107:78–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marino JL, Eskenazi B, Warner M, et al. Uterine leiomyoma and menstrual cycle characteristics in population based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2350–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borgfeldt C, Andolf E. Transvaginal ultrasonographic findings in the uterus and endometrium: low prevalence of leiomyoma in a random sample of women age 25–40 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:202–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mendoza Aguilar M, Herrera Flores I, Viramontes Trejo G, et al. Incidencia de patología de útero y anexos diagnosticada por histerosalpingografía en el Hospital General de México. An Radiol Méx. 2009;3:201–9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, Levine D. Diagnostic ultrasound. 4th ed. Elsevier: Mosby; 2010.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wamsterker K, Emanuel MH, de Kruif JH. Transcervical hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids for abnormal uterine bleeding: results regarding the degree of intramural extension. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:736–40.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dexeus S, Labastida R, Marqués L. Hysteroscopy in daily gynaecologic practice. Acta Eur Fertil. 1986;17:423–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wolf DM, Spataro RF. The current state of hysterosalpingography. Radiographics. 1988;8:1041–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nalaboff K, Pellerito J, Ben-Levi E. Imaging the endometrium: disease and normal variants. Radiographics. 2001;21:1409–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davis P, O’Neill M, Yoder I, et al. Sonohysterographic findings of endometrial and subendometrial conditions. Radiographics. 2002;22:803–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Capuñay C, Baronio M, Carrascosa P, et al. CT virtual hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(Supplement):S211.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bazot M, Salem C, Frey I, et al. Imaging of myomas: is preoperative MRI useful? Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2002;30:711–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simpson WL, Beitia LG, Mester J. Histerosalpingography: a reemerging study. Radiographics. 2006;26:419–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yoder IC, Hall DA. Hysterosalpingography in the 1990s. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:675–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matalliotakis IM, Katsikis IK, Panidis DK. Adenomyosis: what is the impact on fertility? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17:261–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, et al. Adenomyosis in endometriosis-prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2309–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, et al. Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;171:531–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tamai K, Togashi K, Ito T, et al. MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics. 2005;25:21–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bohlman ME, Ensor RE, Sanders RC. Sonographic findings in adenomyosis of the uterus. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148:756–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reinhold C, Tafazoli F, Mehio A, et al. Uterine adenomyosis: endovaginal US and MR imaging features with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics. 1999;19:S147–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Atri M, Reinhold C, Mehio AR, et al. Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in vitro study. Radiology. 2000;215:783–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carrascosa P, Capuñay C, Mariano B, et al. Virtual hysteroscopy by multidetector computed tomography. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33(4):381–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Carrascosa P, Capuñay C, Vallejos J, et al. Virtual Hysterosalpingography: a new multidetector CT technique for evaluating the female reproductive system. Radiographics. 2010;30:643–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Carrascosa
    • 1
  • Carlos Capuñay
    • 1
  • Carlos E. Sueldo
    • 2
  • Juan Mariano Baronio
    • 3
  1. 1.Diagnóstico MaipúBuenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.CEGYRBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations