Advertisement

Morphological Post-treatment Changes

  • Patricia Carrascosa
  • Carlos Capuñay
  • Carlos E. Sueldo
  • Juan Mariano Baronio
Chapter

Abstract

The uterine silhouette is a settling place for different malformations and pathological processes, some of which can require surgical treatment, may it be via the abdomen (laparotomy, laparoscopy) or the vagina (hysteroscopy, laparoscopy). In certain opportunities one can also turn to endovascular treatment, as is the case of the chemoembolization of uterine myomas.

Keywords

Cesarean Section Hyaluronic Acid Uterine Myoma Cesarean Scar Uterine Anomaly 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Macciò A, Madeddu C, Caffiero A, et al. Successful pregnancy following myomectomy of a giant uterine myoma: role of a combined surgical approach. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285:1577–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fernandez H, Kadoch O, Capella-Allouc S, et al. Hysteroscopic resection of submucous myomas: long term results. Ann Chir. 2001;126:58–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paradisi R, Barzanti R, Natali F, et al. Metroplasty in a large population of women with septate uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:449–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Golfieri R, Muzzi C, De Iaco P, et al. The percutaneous treatment of uterine fibromas by means of transcatheter arterial embolization. Radiol Med. 2000;100:48–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gupta JK, Sinha A, Lumsden MA, et al. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(5):CD005073.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kahn V, Fohlen A, Pelage JP. Role of embolization in the management of uterine fibroids. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2011;40:918–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lev-Toaff AS, Karasick S, Toaff ME. Hysterosalpingography before and after myomectomy: clinical value and imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160:803–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen MY, Edwards VH, Ott DJ, et al. Hysterosalpingography after hysteroscopic surgery. Abdom Imaging. 1994;19:477–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baird D, Dunson D, Hill M, et al. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:100–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heinemann K, Thiel C, Mohner S, et al. Benign gynecologic tumors: estimated incidence results of the German Cohort Study on Women’s Health. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;107:78–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Donnez J, Jadoul P. What are the implications of myomas on fertility? A need for a debate? Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1424–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hunt JE, Wallach EE. Uterine factors in infertility-an overview. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1974;17:44–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dalal RJ, Pai HD, Palshetkar NP, et al. Hysteroscopic metroplasty in women with primary infertility and septate uterus: reproductive performance after surgery. J Reprod Med. 2012;57:13–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yoshino O, Nishii O, Osuga Y, et al. Myomectomy decreases abnormal uterine peristalsis and increases pregnancy rate. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19:63–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suvitie P, Perheentupa A. Myomas and fertility. Duodecim. 2011;127:1848–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bourdel N, Bonnefoy C, Jardon K, et al. Hysteroscopic myomectomy: recurrence and satisfaction survey at short- and long-term. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2011;40:116–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hackethal A, Westermann A, Tchartchian G, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy in patients with uterine myomas associated with infertility. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2011;20:338–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sentilhes L, Bouet PE, Mezzadri M, et al. Against the routinely hysteroscopic metroplasty for septate uterus. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2011;39:394–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brucker SY, Rall K, Campo R, et al. Treatment of congenital malformations. Semin Reprod Med. 2011;29:101–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pace S, Stentella P, Catania R, et al. Endoscopic treatment of intrauterine adhesions. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2003;30:26–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Socolov R, Anton E, Butureanu S, et al. The endoscopic management of uterine synechiae. A clinical study of 78 cases. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2010;105:515–8.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fedele L, Vercellini P, Viezzoli T, et al. Intrauterine adhesions: current diagnostic and therapeutic trends. Acta Eur Fertil. 1986;17:31–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kdous M, Hachicha R, Zhiou F, et al. Fertility after hysteroscopic treatment of intra-uterine adhesions. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2003;31:422–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thomson AJ, Abbott JA, Deans R, et al. The management of intrauterine synechiae. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21:335–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seffah JD. Re-laparotomy after cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;88:253–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Monteagudo A, Carreno C, Timor-Tritsch IE. Saline infusion sonohysterography in nonpregnant women with previous cesarean delivery: the “niche” in the scar. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20:1105–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Regnard C, Nosbusch M, Fellemans C, et al. Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:289–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, et al. Laparoscopic repair of wide and deep uterine scar dehiscence after cesarean section. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:974–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Capuñay C, Carrascosa P, Vallejos J, et al. Evaluación de espesor de la pared uterina en el sitio de cicatriz de cesárea anterior en estudios de histerosalpingografía virtual. Congreso Argentino de Radiologia; 2011. http://sar2011.postersenlinea.com/topics.php.
  30. 30.
    Lim PS, Shafiee MN, Ahmad S, et al. Utero-cutaneous fistula after caesarean section secondary to red degeneration of intramural fibroid. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012;3:95–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lang EK, Dunaway Jr HE. Efficacy of salpingography and transcervical recanalization in diagnosis, categorization, and treatment of fallopian tube obstruction. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000;23:417–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Massey JB. Endometriosis and tuboperitoneal fistulas after tubal ligation. Fertil Steril. 1981;36:417–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fylstra DL. Uteroperitoneal fistula formation after proximal salpingectomy with harmonic scalpel resulting in a third consecutive fallopian tube ectopic pregnancy: a case report. J Reprod Med. 2009;54:330–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stock L, Milad M. Surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55:448–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society of Reproductive Surgeons. Salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S66–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Carrascosa
    • 1
  • Carlos Capuñay
    • 1
  • Carlos E. Sueldo
    • 2
  • Juan Mariano Baronio
    • 3
  1. 1.Diagnóstico MaipúBuenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.CEGYRBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations